A Comparative Study of an Integrated Pharmaceutical Care Plan and a Routine Care in Bronchial Asthma

January 24, 2014 updated by: Rana Rasheed Ibrahim Farrag, Ain Shams University
The aim of the study is to compare the effect of asthma care by clinical pharmacist intervention versus routine care on asthma control.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

80

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Cairo, Egypt
        • Ain Shams University Hospitals

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 70 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • patient with clinical diagnosis of bronchial asthma
  • responsible for administering their own asthma medications.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • patients who were not responsible for administering their own asthma medications.
  • patients with cognitive defects, other pulmonary disease e.g. Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD), experiencing illness with asthma-like symptoms e.g. Congestive Heart Failure, evidence of fixed airway obstruction
  • patients unavailable for 2-month follow-up.
  • patients who did not provide written informed consent.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Health Services Research
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Routine Care
Patients received usual care delivered by physician without pharmacist intervention. Patients were prescribed asthma medication with summarized basic information on asthma and medication use. Follow-up visits were not planned on consistent basis, but rather individually according to the disease status. No asthma action plans were provided.
Experimental: Pharmacist-Intervention
Patients received additional education on basic facts about asthma, role of medications, the difference between long-term control medications and quick-relief medications, as well as patient skills in the first visit then reinforcement every two weeks.. The importance of proper inhaler technique, avoidance of asthma triggers and self-monitoring of asthma were also highlighted. Visual aids, physical demonstration as well as written information resources were supplied. Asthma care plans were tailored to patient needs and preferences. Patients were informed how to detect early signs of worsening asthma, when and how to seek medical care as appropriate.
Other Names:
  • Patient Education
  • Asthma Action Plan
  • Shared Decision Making

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Asthma Control Questionnaire
Time Frame: at baseline & after 2 months of therapy
at baseline & after 2 months of therapy

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 second (FEV1%)
Time Frame: at baseline & after 2 months of therapy
at baseline & after 2 months of therapy
Rescue Medication SABA (number of puffs used most days)
Time Frame: at baseline & after 2 months of therapy
at baseline & after 2 months of therapy
Inhaled Corticosteroid Use (number of puffs used/day)
Time Frame: at baseline & after 2 months of therapy
at baseline & after 2 months of therapy
Number of courses of systemic steroid used
Time Frame: During 2 months of therapy
During 2 months of therapy
Number of ER visits/ Hospitalization
Time Frame: During 2 months of therapy
During 2 months of therapy

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Assessment of Inhalation Technique
Time Frame: at baseline and after 2 months of therapy
at baseline and after 2 months of therapy
Patient Adherence to Therapy
Time Frame: 2 months of therapy
2 months of therapy

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Rana R Farrag, Ahram Canadian University

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

March 1, 2012

Primary Completion (Actual)

January 1, 2013

Study Completion (Actual)

January 1, 2013

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 24, 2014

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 24, 2014

First Posted (Estimate)

January 28, 2014

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

January 28, 2014

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 24, 2014

Last Verified

January 1, 2014

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Bronchial Asthma

Clinical Trials on Pharmacist- Intervention

Subscribe