- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT02051959
Long-term Effects of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS) on Patients With Phantom Limb Pain (PLP)
Long-Term Treatment of Patients Experiencing Phantom Limb Pain With Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS)
- Phantom limb pain (PLP) refers to pain in a limb that has been amputated or deafferented. Phantom limb pain might be related to brain cortical plastic changes.
- The purpose of this study is to determine the efficacy of a series of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) sessions, a non-invasive and focal brain stimulation method, in producing long-term reduction of phantom limb pain among amputees who experience such pain.
This is a Crossover sham control.
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Study Type
Enrollment (Anticipated)
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
-
Ramat Gan, Israel
- Department of Orthopedic Rehabilitation, Sheba Medical Center
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Age 18 to 80
- Limb amputation from at least 6 months before study enrollment
- Presence of PLP at least 2 times a week and present 4 weeks prior to onset of study
- Written informed consent
Exclusion Criteria:
- Coexistence of major neurological or psychiatric diseases
- Being actively enrolled in a separate study targeting pain relief
- Post traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) diagnosed patients
- Any contraindication to noninvasive brain stimulation such as past brain surgery, brain implants, cochlear implant, epilepsy or any past seizure
- Pregnant women
- Within the traumatic amputees group - subjects diagnosed with diabetes
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Quadruple
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
---|---|
Active Comparator: Crossover 1a: anodal stimulation of M1 + sham
6 amputees will undergo 8 active treatments of 20 min 2mA anodal stimulation of M1 localized to the contralateral amputation area followed by 8 sham treatments. Total duration and frequency of treatments: 8 weeks, 2 sessions per week. Each session will last approximately one hour which will consist of:
|
8 active treatmments: 2mA anodal stimulation of M1 for 20 minutes (over the relevant cortex area) followed by 8 sham treatments.
Other Names:
|
Active Comparator: Crossover 1b: sham + anodal stimulation of M1
6 amputees will undergo 8 sham treatments followed by 8 active treatments of 20 min 2mA anodal stimulation of M1 localized to the contralateral amputation area. Total duration and frequency of treatments: 8 weeks, 2 sessions per week. Each session will last approximately one hour which will consist of:
|
8 sham treatments followed by 8 active treatmments: 2mA anodal stimulation of M1 for 20 minutes (over the relevant cortex area).
Other Names:
|
Active Comparator: Crossover 2a: cathodal stimulation of M1 + sham
6 amputees will undergo 8 active treatments of 20 min 2mA cathodal stimulation of M1 localized to the contralateral amputation area followed by 8 sham treatments. Total duration and frequency of treatments: 8 weeks, 2 sessions per week. Each session will last approximately one hour which will consist of:
|
8 active treatmments: 2mA cathodal stimulation of M1 for 20 minutes (over the relevant cortex area) , followed by 8 sham treatments.
Other Names:
|
Active Comparator: Crossover 2b: sham + cathodal stimulation of M1
6 amputees will undergo 8 sham treatments followed by 8 active treatments of 20 min 2mA cathodal stimulation of M1 localized to the contralateral amputation area. Total duration and frequency of treatments: 8 weeks, 2 sessions per week. Each session will last approximately one hour which will consist of:
|
8 sham treatments followed by 8 active treatmments: 2mA cathodal stimulation of M1 for 20 minutes (over the relevant cortex area).
Other Names:
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Reduced phantom limb pain
Time Frame: 5 months after last stimulation session
|
Reduction of phantom limb pain compared to phantom limb pain before treatment, according to Visual Analog Scales (VAS) evaluation
|
5 months after last stimulation session
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Adverse effects of treatment
Time Frame: Up to 5 weeks
|
Severity of any adverse effects related to the transcranial direct current stimulation treatment will be checked after each stimulation session
|
Up to 5 weeks
|
Effects of treatment on the electrical activity of the brain
Time Frame: Up to 5 weeks
|
Measurement of the electrical activity of the brain before, during and after each stimulation using an electroencephalography (EEG) device.
|
Up to 5 weeks
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Itzhak Siev-Ner, MD, Sheba Medical Center
Publications and helpful links
General Publications
- Gandiga PC, Hummel FC, Cohen LG. Transcranial DC stimulation (tDCS): a tool for double-blind sham-controlled clinical studies in brain stimulation. Clin Neurophysiol. 2006 Apr;117(4):845-50. doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2005.12.003. Epub 2006 Jan 19.
- Nitsche MA, Paulus W. Excitability changes induced in the human motor cortex by weak transcranial direct current stimulation. J Physiol. 2000 Sep 15;527 Pt 3(Pt 3):633-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-7793.2000.t01-1-00633.x.
- Birbaumer N, Lutzenberger W, Montoya P, Larbig W, Unertl K, Topfner S, Grodd W, Taub E, Flor H. Effects of regional anesthesia on phantom limb pain are mirrored in changes in cortical reorganization. J Neurosci. 1997 Jul 15;17(14):5503-8. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.17-14-05503.1997.
- Poreisz C, Boros K, Antal A, Paulus W. Safety aspects of transcranial direct current stimulation concerning healthy subjects and patients. Brain Res Bull. 2007 May 30;72(4-6):208-14. doi: 10.1016/j.brainresbull.2007.01.004. Epub 2007 Jan 24.
- Nitsche MA, Liebetanz D, Lang N, Antal A, Tergau F, Paulus W. Safety criteria for transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) in humans. Clin Neurophysiol. 2003 Nov;114(11):2220-2; author reply 2222-3. doi: 10.1016/s1388-2457(03)00235-9. No abstract available.
- Cohen LG, Bandinelli S, Findley TW, Hallett M. Motor reorganization after upper limb amputation in man. A study with focal magnetic stimulation. Brain. 1991 Feb;114 ( Pt 1B):615-27. doi: 10.1093/brain/114.1.615.
- Fuhr P, Cohen LG, Dang N, Findley TW, Haghighi S, Oro J, Hallett M. Physiological analysis of motor reorganization following lower limb amputation. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1992 Feb;85(1):53-60. doi: 10.1016/0168-5597(92)90102-h.
- Kew JJ, Ridding MC, Rothwell JC, Passingham RE, Leigh PN, Sooriakumaran S, Frackowiak RS, Brooks DJ. Reorganization of cortical blood flow and transcranial magnetic stimulation maps in human subjects after upper limb amputation. J Neurophysiol. 1994 Nov;72(5):2517-24. doi: 10.1152/jn.1994.72.5.2517.
- Lotze M, Flor H, Grodd W, Larbig W, Birbaumer N. Phantom movements and pain. An fMRI study in upper limb amputees. Brain. 2001 Nov;124(Pt 11):2268-77. doi: 10.1093/brain/124.11.2268.
- Nitsche MA, Liebetanz D, Antal A, Lang N, Tergau F, Paulus W. Modulation of cortical excitability by weak direct current stimulation--technical, safety and functional aspects. Suppl Clin Neurophysiol. 2003;56:255-76. doi: 10.1016/s1567-424x(09)70230-2. No abstract available.
- Brown JA, Barbaro NM. Motor cortex stimulation for central and neuropathic pain: current status. Pain. 2003 Aug;104(3):431-435. doi: 10.1016/S0304-3959(03)00209-4. No abstract available.
- Flor H. Phantom-limb pain: characteristics, causes, and treatment. Lancet Neurol. 2002 Jul;1(3):182-9. doi: 10.1016/s1474-4422(02)00074-1.
- Flor H, Elbert T, Knecht S, Wienbruch C, Pantev C, Birbaumer N, Larbig W, Taub E. Phantom-limb pain as a perceptual correlate of cortical reorganization following arm amputation. Nature. 1995 Jun 8;375(6531):482-4. doi: 10.1038/375482a0.
- Chen R, Corwell B, Yaseen Z, Hallett M, Cohen LG. Mechanisms of cortical reorganization in lower-limb amputees. J Neurosci. 1998 May 1;18(9):3443-50. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.18-09-03443.1998.
- Lefaucheur JP, Drouot X, Menard-Lefaucheur I, Zerah F, Bendib B, Cesaro P, Keravel Y, Nguyen JP. Neurogenic pain relief by repetitive transcranial magnetic cortical stimulation depends on the origin and the site of pain. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2004 Apr;75(4):612-6. doi: 10.1136/jnnp.2003.022236.
- Khedr EM, Kotb H, Kamel NF, Ahmed MA, Sadek R, Rothwell JC. Longlasting antalgic effects of daily sessions of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation in central and peripheral neuropathic pain. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2005 Jun;76(6):833-8. doi: 10.1136/jnnp.2004.055806.
- Grusser SM, Winter C, Muhlnickel W, Denke C, Karl A, Villringer K, Flor H. The relationship of perceptual phenomena and cortical reorganization in upper extremity amputees. Neuroscience. 2001;102(2):263-72. doi: 10.1016/s0306-4522(00)00491-7.
- Bolognini N, Olgiati E, Maravita A, Ferraro F, Fregni F. Motor and parietal cortex stimulation for phantom limb pain and sensations. Pain. 2013 Aug;154(8):1274-80. doi: 10.1016/j.pain.2013.03.040. Epub 2013 Apr 19.
- Nuti C, Peyron R, Garcia-Larrea L, Brunon J, Laurent B, Sindou M, Mertens P. Motor cortex stimulation for refractory neuropathic pain: four year outcome and predictors of efficacy. Pain. 2005 Nov;118(1-2):43-52. doi: 10.1016/j.pain.2005.07.020. Epub 2005 Oct 7.
- Khedr EM, Ahmed MA, Fathy N, Rothwell JC. Therapeutic trial of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation after acute ischemic stroke. Neurology. 2005 Aug 9;65(3):466-8. doi: 10.1212/01.wnl.0000173067.84247.36.
- O'Connell NE, Cossar J, Marston L, Wand BM, Bunce D, Moseley GL, De Souza LH. Rethinking clinical trials of transcranial direct current stimulation: participant and assessor blinding is inadequate at intensities of 2mA. PLoS One. 2012;7(10):e47514. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0047514. Epub 2012 Oct 17.
- Karl A, Birbaumer N, Lutzenberger W, Cohen LG, Flor H. Reorganization of motor and somatosensory cortex in upper extremity amputees with phantom limb pain. J Neurosci. 2001 May 15;21(10):3609-18. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.21-10-03609.2001.
- Roricht S, Meyer BU, Niehaus L, Brandt SA. Long-term reorganization of motor cortex outputs after arm amputation. Neurology. 1999 Jul 13;53(1):106-11. doi: 10.1212/wnl.53.1.106.
- Yang TT, Gallen CC, Ramachandran VS, Cobb S, Schwartz BJ, Bloom FE. Noninvasive detection of cerebral plasticity in adult human somatosensory cortex. Neuroreport. 1994 Feb 24;5(6):701-4. doi: 10.1097/00001756-199402000-00010.
- Hall EJ, Flament D, Fraser C, Lemon RN. Non-invasive brain stimulation reveals reorganized cortical outputs in amputees. Neurosci Lett. 1990 Aug 24;116(3):379-86. doi: 10.1016/0304-3940(90)90105-i.
- Elbert T, Sterr A, Flor H, Rockstroh B, Knecht S, Pantev C, Wienbruch C, Taub E. Input-increase and input-decrease types of cortical reorganization after upper extremity amputation in humans. Exp Brain Res. 1997 Oct;117(1):161-4. doi: 10.1007/s002210050210.
- Tsubokawa T, Katayama Y, Yamamoto T, Hirayama T, Koyama S. Chronic motor cortex stimulation for the treatment of central pain. Acta Neurochir Suppl (Wien). 1991;52:137-9. doi: 10.1007/978-3-7091-9160-6_37.
- Topper R, Foltys H, Meister IG, Sparing R, Boroojerdi B. Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation of the parietal cortex transiently ameliorates phantom limb pain-like syndrome. Clin Neurophysiol. 2003 Aug;114(8):1521-30. doi: 10.1016/s1388-2457(03)00117-2.
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start
Primary Completion (Anticipated)
Study Completion (Anticipated)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Estimate)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Estimate)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- SHEBA-13-0733-IS-CTIL
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Phantom Limb Pain
-
Shirley Ryan AbilityLabCoapt, LLCRecruitingLower Limb Amputation Below Knee (Injury) | Lower Limb Amputation Above Knee (Injury) | Amputation | Phantom Limb Pain | Phantom Pain | Phantom Sensation | Lower Limb Amputation Knee | Lower Limb Amputation at Ankle (Injury) | Upper Limb Amputation at the Hand | Upper Limb Amputation at the Wrist | Upper... and other conditionsUnited States
-
Artur BiktimirovEnrolling by invitationAmputation | Phantom Limb Pain | Lower Limb Amputation | Phantom PainRussian Federation
-
United States Naval Medical Center, San DiegoUnknownPhantom Limb Pain | Phantom Pain | Phantom Sensation | PseudomeliaUnited States
-
VA Office of Research and DevelopmentRecruitingChronic Pain | Lower Limb Amputation | Phantom Pain | Upper Limb Amputation | Phantom Limb Pain After AmputationUnited States
-
Artur BiktimirovEnrolling by invitationAmputation | Phantom Limb Pain | Phantom PainRussian Federation
-
Centre d'Investigation Clinique et Technologique...CompletedAmputation | Phantom Pain Following Amputation of Lower LimbFrance
-
University of California, San DiegoCompletedPhantom Limb Pain | Residual Limb PainUnited States
-
University of California, San DiegoVarian Medical Systems; Epimed InternationalRecruitingAmputation, Traumatic | Phantom Limb Pain | Phantom Pain Following Amputation of Lower Limb | Amputation, SurgicalUnited States
-
Cairo UniversityActive, not recruitingPhantom Pain Following Amputation of Lower LimbEgypt
-
University of Alabama at BirminghamCompletedAmputation | Phantom Limb Pain | Residual Limb PainUnited States
Clinical Trials on Anodal stimulation of M1 + sham
-
Riphah International UniversityCompleted
-
Riphah International UniversityCompleted
-
Hospital de Clinicas de Porto AlegreCompletedPain | Working Memory | Transcranial Direct Current StimulationBrazil
-
Samsung Medical CenterCompletedStrokeKorea, Republic of
-
Universidade Federal de PernambucoUnknown
-
Second Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine,...Not yet recruiting
-
University of WaterlooThe Hong Kong Polytechnic UniversityCompleted
-
Samsung Medical CenterCompletedHealthyKorea, Republic of
-
University of CalgaryCompleted
-
University of CalgaryCompletedLaparoscopic Surgical ProceduresCanada