CT Perfusion Imaging to Predict Vasospasm in Subarachnoid Hemorrhage (CT-PIPS)

February 6, 2023 updated by: Nova Scotia Health Authority
Patients with brain hemorrhage resulting from a ruptured aneurysm (SAH) are at risk of developing a condition called vasospasm, one or two weeks after their hemorrhage. This is a major cause of stroke and death following SAH. A special type of CT scan, called CT perfusion, analyzes regional blood flow in the brain. We hypothesize that CT perfusion scans performed on admission and day 6 post-hemorrhage will enable us to predict which patients will go on to develop vasospasm.

Study Overview

Status

Active, not recruiting

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Rupture of a brain aneurysm results in a type of bleeding into the brain called subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH). This is a substantial cause of morbidity and mortality world-wide: even with the best possible care, up to half of patients die and many are left disabled. Sometimes this is because the immediate brain damage from the bleed is very severe. However, many patients who seem to be doing well at first go on to develop something called "vasospasm": narrowing of large arteries in the brain. This results in the brain not getting enough blood, and the patient can suffer a stroke as a result. The lack of blood to the brain is called delayed cerebral ischemia (DCI), and is the major secondary cause of stroke and death in patients who survived the initial aneurysm rupture.

Vasospasm can be seen on angiograms (blood vessel imaging) in about two-thirds of SAH patients, and causes neurological symptoms of DCI in half of those patients. It usually develops about a week or so after SAH. Early diagnosis and treatment of cerebral vasospasm and delayed cerebral ischemia (DCI) reduces morbidity and mortality in SAH patients.

CT perfusion imaging is able to identify areas of reduced cerebral blood flow that are at risk of DCI and stroke. This technique is able to measure cerebral blood flow and blood volume (CBF, CBV), and calculates two other measures of cerebral perfusion: time to peak intensity (TTP) and mean transit time (MTT). Taken together, these provide information about the amount of blood the brain is receiving and whether the brain is compensating for any reduction in flow. This is helpful because seeing vasospasm on imaging is not enough to predict brain ischemia and stroke; the additional physiological information provided by the perfusion assessment strengthens the diagnosis of DCI. Early evidence suggests that CT perfusion is a fast, accurate, inexpensive and non-invasive method of brain imaging to identify patients with DCI after SAH, and guide appropriate therapy.

If we were able to successfully predict which patients are at high risk of DCI and/or stroke, we could intervene early. This could improve patient outcomes, while potentially allowing better use of limited intensive care and nursing resources. Other studies have shown that patients with DCI had altered perfusion prior to developing clinical symptoms, but we do not know whether we can use CT perfusion to predict patients at risk, or which CT perfusion measurements (e.g., CBF or TTP) are most useful.

The radiation risk associated with CT perfusion imaging is negligible, due to advances in CT technology which allow for routine simultaneous CT perfusion and CT angiogram (CTA) without a significant increase in radiation dose over conventional head CT-CTA alone. Judicious use of CT perfusion, through a structured algorithm that includes routine perfusion scans at admission and during the peak risk period for vasospasm, may actually decrease cumulative radiation dose for patients with SAH, by ruling out perfusion deficit and brain ischemia as a cause of decreased neurological function and limiting repeated angiograms.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

41

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Nova Scotia
      • Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada, B3H 3A7
        • Halifax Infirmary, Capital District Health Authority

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 75 years (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patient is between 18 and 75 years of age (inclusive).
  • Patient has a documented aneurysmal SAH.
  • Patient or next of kin or person with appropriate power of attorney has provided written informed consent.
  • Patient is willing and available for study follow-up visits.
  • Patient has not been previously entered into this study.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Inability to obtain informed written consent.
  • Patient is < 18 or > 75 years old.
  • Patient is not expected to survive >24 hours (e.g. those presenting with loss of brain stem reflexes, or patients transferred to the Halifax Infirmary ICU for consideration of organ donation rather than active treatment)
  • Patient history indicates high risk of non-compliance (e.g., substance abuse, psychosocial issues, etc.)
  • Patient is currently breast feeding, or pregnant
  • Patient is currently enrolled in another clinical study (device or drug).

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: DIAGNOSTIC
  • Allocation: NA
  • Interventional Model: SINGLE_GROUP
  • Masking: NONE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
EXPERIMENTAL: CT Perfusion
All patients enrolled in the study
Quantitative CT Perfusion imaging

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
CBF Admit
Time Frame: Baseline
Cerebral blood flow as measured on CT perfusion study on admission
Baseline
CBV Admit
Time Frame: Baseline
Cerebral blood volume as measured on CT perfusion study on admission
Baseline
MTT Admit
Time Frame: Baseline
Mean transit time as measured on CT perfusion study on admission
Baseline
TTP Admit
Time Frame: Baseline
Time to peak as measured on CT perfusion study on admission
Baseline
CBF day 6
Time Frame: Day 6 post-SAH
Cerebral blood flow as measured on CT perfusion study on day 6 following subarachnoid hemorrhage
Day 6 post-SAH
CBV day 6
Time Frame: Day 6 post-SAH
Cerebral blood volume as measured on CT perfusion study on day 6 following subarachnoid hemorrhage
Day 6 post-SAH
MTT day 6
Time Frame: Day 6 post-SAH
Mean transit time as measured on CT perfusion study on day 6 following subarachnoid hemorrhage
Day 6 post-SAH
TTP day 6
Time Frame: Day 6 post-SAH
Time to peak as measured on CT perfusion study on day 6 following subarachnoid hemorrhage
Day 6 post-SAH

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Radiation Dose
Time Frame: 30 days post-SAH
Total cumulative radiation dose from cranial imaging (CT Head, CT angiogram, CT perfusion, catheter angiography, endovascular coiling) during the initial hospital admission for SAH, up to 30 days post-SAH.
30 days post-SAH

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Delayed Cerebral Ischemia
Time Frame: 30 days post-SAH
Delayed cerebral ischemia is defined using a consensus recently agreed upon by an international panel of experts: namely, 1) stroke seen on CT or MRI scan, or proven at autopsy (not including stroke related to the aneurysm treatment), or 2) clinical deterioration presumed to be caused by DCI after other causes are excluded.
30 days post-SAH

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Gwynedd E Pickett, MD, Capital District Health Authority, Halifax, Canada

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (ACTUAL)

April 1, 2014

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

June 1, 2018

Study Completion (ANTICIPATED)

February 1, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 3, 2014

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 5, 2014

First Posted (ESTIMATE)

February 6, 2014

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

February 8, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 6, 2023

Last Verified

February 1, 2023

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Subarachnoid Hemorrhage

Clinical Trials on CT Perfusion

3
Subscribe