Nasal High Flow at Acute Hart Failure

September 24, 2019 updated by: Maximilian Malfertheiner, University Hospital Regensburg

Does the Use of Optiflow High Flow Oxygen on Patients With Acute Cardial Decompensation (NYHA Classification Stage III-IV) Allow for Quicker Improvement of the Organ Dysfunction Than Conventional Standard-Oxygen-Insufflation-Therapy?

The pilot study aims to compare the results of using a new respirator (OPTIFLOW TM-High-Flow-Machine) with those from Standard-Oxygen-Therapy during the stabilization of patients who have been hospitalized due to acute heart failure. We expect a faster and more effective stabilization after acute cardial decompensation among the patients with the High-Flow-machine.

The study should show whether the use of High-Flow-Therapy leads to a relevant improvement in terms of objective clinical parameters of heart failure like those for cardial-renal syndrome, changes in the nt-pro-BNP, weight loss, changes in the diameter of the inferior vena cava, in terms of the degree of shortness of breath and decompensation, and whether subjective clinical symptoms like dyspnea and quality of life differ between the two groups of patients.

The investigators see the primary outcome of the study as the improvement of the cardial-renal syndrome as a sign of the more effective stabilisation compared to the standard therapy. Furthermore, the investigators expect a quicker decrease in serum creatinine and an improvement in the creatinine clearance through therapy with the High-Flow-Machine. In terms of secondary outcomes of the study, the investigators are interested in also comparing e.g., the duration of hospital stays, 90-day mortality, and rehospitalisation within three months. Here, the investigators expect a quicker improvement in the subjective shortness of breath of the patients who are treated using the Hifh-Flow-Machine. Moreover, we believe that along with the individual subjective improvements (quality of life survey), the patients will experience a quicker release from the hospital and in this way, lead to a healthcare economic improvement among patients with repeated hospitalizations who usually have chronic problems.

It is also of great interest to us, whether the biomarker BNP is an appropriate parameter for determining the faster stabilization of the patient and whether the degree of improvement of subjective dyspnea is correlated with the time needed until the patient has been stabilised.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Primary endpoint:

Improvement of the cardiorenal syndrome type1 measured by the improvement of creatine clearance and the Serum-Creatinin of patients undergoing High-Flow treatment.

Secondary endpoints:

Worsening of cardiac insufficiency (application of catecholamines, need of NIV, intubation, death) Duration of hospital stay (in days) 90-day mortality Readmittance to hospital within 3 months Intrathoracic bloodvolume at hospital discharge Change of dyspnea at 3h, 6h, 24h > VAS-0-100 (visual analog scale) Change in the diameter of the IVC (inferior vena cava) as a non-invasive parameter for assessing the degree of decompensation Change in the BNP (hospital admission vs. discharge, after 3 months) Weight loss in hospital Amount of diuretics

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

46

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Sachsen Anhalt
      • Magdeburg, Sachsen Anhalt, Germany, 39120
        • UHMagdeburg

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • patients with acute heartfailure NYHA III und IV

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients wit respiratory insufficency and indication for mechanical ventilation
  • Asthma bronchiale
  • severe COPD
  • cardiogenic shock (RR persisting< 90mmHg systolic or catecholamine application)
  • renal dialysis

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Other: Conventional nasal Oxygen
Conventional nasal Oxygen as needed
Other Names:
  • nasal oxygen
Other: Nasal high flow
Nasal high flow therapy with FiO2 40% and flow of 40l/min for at least 48h
Other Names:
  • Optiflow
  • Fisher & Paykel Healthcare
  • RT202

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Cardiorenal syndrome type 1
Time Frame: 3 Months
The acute deterioration of the cardial situation often leads to a consecutive deterioration of renal function. The damage to renal function caused by acute cardial genesis is defined as cardiorenal syndrome type 1 [2]. In such cases, the venous congestion with heightened central venous pressure leads to disruption of renalfunction and possibly even to acute kidney failure [3, 4]. This is defined as cardiorenal syndrom with an increase in serumcreatine of >0,3 mg/dl and is associated with higher mortality and longer hospital stays [5].
3 Months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change of dyspnea
Time Frame: 3h, 6h, 24h
Change of dyspnea at 3h, 6h, 24h > VAS-0-100 (visual analog scale)
3h, 6h, 24h

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
90-day mortality
Time Frame: 90 days
Mortality after 90 days
90 days

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

September 1, 2010

Primary Completion (Actual)

May 1, 2014

Study Completion (Actual)

May 1, 2014

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 6, 2014

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 7, 2014

First Posted (Estimate)

February 10, 2014

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

September 26, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 24, 2019

Last Verified

September 1, 2019

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 300513

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Decompensated Heartfailure

Clinical Trials on Conventional nasal oxygen

3
Subscribe