A Study Evaluating the Safety, Efficacy, and Pharmacodynamic Effects of ABT-981 in Patients With Knee Osteoarthritis

August 9, 2019 updated by: AbbVie

A Phase 2a Study Evaluating the Safety, Efficacy, and Pharmacodynamic Effects of ABT-981 in Patients With Knee Osteoarthritis

A Phase 2a, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, parallel group, placebo-controlled study to evaluate the safety, tolerability, efficacy and pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic effect of ABT-981 in patients with symptomatic, radiographic, and inflammatory knee osteoarthritis.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

350

Phase

  • Phase 2

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

35 years to 74 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Radiographic knee osteoarthritis with Kellgren-Lawrence Grade 2 or 3
  2. Body Mass Index (BMI) 18-34 kg/m2
  3. One or more clinical signs and symptoms of active inflammation in the index knee

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. History of allergic reaction to any constituents of the study drug, or to any Immunoglobulin G (IgG)-containing product
  2. History of anaphylactic reaction to any agent
  3. Significant trauma or surgery to the index knee
  4. Severe knee malalignment
  5. Any uncontrolled medical illness or an unstable treatment or therapy

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Quadruple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Placebo Comparator: Placebo
Experimental: ABT-981 low dose
25 mg ABT-981 subcutaneous (SC) every 2 weeks (E2W)
Other Names:
  • Lutikizumab
Experimental: ABT-981 medium dose
100 mg ABT-981 SC E2W
Other Names:
  • Lutikizumab
Experimental: ABT-981 high dose
200 mg ABT-981 SC E2W
Other Names:
  • Lutikizumab

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Scores of the Index Knee at Week 16
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 16
The WOMAC was developed to assess pain, stiffness, and physical function in subjects with hip and/or knee osteoarthritis. The WOMAC consists of 24 items divided into 3 subscales: Pain (5 items); Stiffness (2 items); and Physical Function (17 items). Each item is rated on an 11-point (0 to 10) numerical rating scale (NRS). The pain sub-score has a range of 0 (no pain) to 50 (maximum pain). A negative change from baseline indicates improvement.
Baseline, Week 16
Change From Baseline in Quantitative Synovitis of the Index Knee at Week 26
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 26
Change in synovitis of the index knee was evaluated using quantitative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) measurements. MRI quantitative synovitis of the index knee was defined by mean synovial membrane thickness.
Baseline, Week 26
Change From Baseline in Effusion Volume of the Index Knee at Week 26
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 26
Baseline, Week 26
Change From Baseline in Whole-Organ Magnetic Resonance Imaging Score (WORMS) Semi-Quantitative Synovitis/Effusion Score of the Index Knee at Week 26
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 26
Semi-quantitative synovitis/effusion volume WORMS scores were scored as normal (0), < 33% of maximum estimated distention (1), 33% - 66% of maximum estimated distention (2), or > 66% of maximum estimated distention (3).
Baseline, Week 26

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change From Baseline in WOMAC Physical Function Scores of the Index Knee at Week 16
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 16
The WOMAC was developed to assess pain, stiffness, and physical function in subjects with hip and/or knee osteoarthritis. The WOMAC consists of 24 items divided into 3 subscales: Pain (5 items); Stiffness (2 items); and Physical Function (17 items). Each item is rated on an 11-point (0 to 10) NRS. The WOMAC physical function subscale score was 0 (normal) to 170 (least physical function). A negative change from baseline indicates improvement.
Baseline, Week 16
Change From Baseline in WOMAC Physical Function Scores of the Index Knee at Week 26
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 26
The WOMAC was developed to assess pain, stiffness, and physical function in subjects with hip and/or knee osteoarthritis. The WOMAC consists of 24 items divided into 3 subscales: Pain (5 items); Stiffness (2 items); and Physical Function (17 items). Each item is rated on an 11-point (0 to 10) NRS. The WOMAC physical function subscale score was 0 (normal) to 170 (least physical function). A negative change from baseline indicates improvement.
Baseline, Week 26
Change From Baseline in WOMAC Physical Function Scores of the Index Knee at Week 52
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 52
The WOMAC was developed to assess pain, stiffness, and physical function in subjects with hip and/or knee osteoarthritis. The WOMAC consists of 24 items divided into 3 subscales: Pain (5 items); Stiffness (2 items); and Physical Function (17 items). Each item is rated on an 11-point (0 to 10) NRS. The WOMAC physical function subscale score was 0 (normal) to 170 (least physical function). A negative change from baseline indicates improvement.
Baseline, Week 52
Change From Baseline in WOMAC Pain Scores of the Index Knee at Week 26
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 26
The WOMAC was developed to assess pain, stiffness, and physical function in subjects with hip and/or knee osteoarthritis. The WOMAC consists of 24 items divided into 3 subscales: Pain (5 items); Stiffness (2 items); and Physical Function (17 items). Each item is rated on an 11-point (0 to 10) numerical rating scale (NRS). The pain sub-score has a range of 0 (no pain) to 50 (maximum pain). A negative change from baseline indicates improvement.
Baseline, Week 26
Change From Baseline in WOMAC Pain Scores of the Index Knee at Week 52
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 52
The WOMAC was developed to assess pain, stiffness, and physical function in subjects with hip and/or knee osteoarthritis. The WOMAC consists of 24 items divided into 3 subscales: Pain (5 items); Stiffness (2 items); and Physical Function (17 items). Each item is rated on an 11-point (0 to 10) numerical rating scale (NRS). The pain sub-score has a range of 0 (no pain) to 50 (maximum pain). A negative change from baseline indicates improvement.
Baseline, Week 52
Change From Baseline in Global Total Bone Marrow Lesion (BML) Score of the Index Knee Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) at Week 26
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 26
BMLs in 15 regions were measured with MRI, and graded as 0 (normal), 1 (mild; < 25% of region), 2 (moderate; 25% - 50% of region), or 3 (severe; > 50% of region). The global total BML score was the sum of the 15 component scores, and ranged from 0 (normal) to 45 (severe).
Baseline, Week 26
Change From Baseline in Global Total BML Score of the Index Knee MRI at Week 52
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 52
BMLs in 15 regions were measured with MRI, and graded as 0 (normal), 1 (mild; < 25% of region), 2 (moderate; 25% - 50% of region), or 3 (severe; > 50% of region). The global total BML score was the sum of the 15 component scores, and ranged from 0 (normal) to 45 (severe).
Baseline, Week 52
Change From Baseline in Index Knee Intermittent and Constant Osteoarthritis Pain (ICOAP) Scores at Week 16
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 16
The ICOAP is a multidimensional osteoarthritis-specific measure designed to comprehensively evaluate the pain experience in patients with hip or knee osteoarthritis. The ICOAP includes 11 items (5 constant pain items; 6 intermittent pain items). Each item is rated on a 0 to 4 point scale with a 7-day recall period. The raw maximum intermittent pain score ranges from 0 to 24, transformed to a reported scale of 0 (no pain) to 100 (worst pain). The raw maximum constant pain score ranges from 0 to 20, transformed to a reported scale of 0 (no pain) to 100 (worst pain).
Baseline, Week 16
Change From Baseline in Index Knee ICOAP Scores at Week 26
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 26
The ICOAP is a multidimensional osteoarthritis-specific measure designed to comprehensively evaluate the pain experience in patients with hip or knee osteoarthritis. The ICOAP includes 11 items (5 constant pain items; 6 intermittent pain items). Each item is rated on a 0 to 4 point scale with a 7-day recall period. The raw maximum intermittent pain score ranges from 0 to 24, transformed to a reported scale of 0 (no pain) to 100 (worst pain). The raw maximum constant pain score ranges from 0 to 20, transformed to a reported scale of 0 (no pain) to 100 (worst pain).
Baseline, Week 26
Change From Baseline in Index Knee ICOAP Scores at Week 52
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 52
The ICOAP is a multidimensional osteoarthritis-specific measure designed to comprehensively evaluate the pain experience in patients with hip or knee osteoarthritis. The ICOAP includes 11 items (5 constant pain items; 6 intermittent pain items). Each item is rated on a 0 to 4 point scale with a 7-day recall period. The raw maximum intermittent pain score ranges from 0 to 24, transformed to a reported scale of 0 (no pain) to 100 (worst pain). The raw maximum constant pain score ranges from 0 to 20, transformed to a reported scale of 0 (no pain) to 100 (worst pain).
Baseline, Week 52
Change From Baseline In Index Knee Pain Intensity at Week 16
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 16
The index knee pain intensity was assessed in 3 different ways using an 11 -point NRS (0 to 10 points representing 'no pain' to 'worst possible pain'). Subjects were asked to enter: 1) average pain intensity during the past week (7-day recall period); 2) the worst pain during activity over the past 24 hours; 3) pain intensity before and after a 40 meter walk (performance pain, before and after). The 40 meter fast paced walk test is a test of short distance walking activity, walking speed over short distances and changing direction during walking. Individuals taking the test should walk as quickly but as safely as possible, without running, along a walkway and then turn around, and repeat again for a total distance of 40 m (132 feet). The total time taken to walk the 40 meters is recorded.
Baseline, Week 16
Change From Baseline In Index Knee Pain Intensity at Week 26
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 26
The index knee pain intensity was assessed in 3 different ways using an 11 -point NRS (0 to 10 points representing 'no pain' to 'worst possible pain'). Subjects were asked to enter: 1) average pain intensity during the past week (7-day recall period); 2) the worst pain during activity over the past 24 hours; 3) pain intensity before and after a 40 meter walk (performance pain, before and after). The 40 meter fast paced walk test is a test of short distance walking activity, walking speed over short distances and changing direction during walking. Individuals taking the test should walk as quickly but as safely as possible, without running, along a walkway and then turn around, and repeat again for a total distance of 40 m (132 feet). The total time taken to walk the 40 meters is recorded.
Baseline, Week 26
Change From Baseline In Index Knee Pain Intensity at Week 52
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 52
The index knee pain intensity was assessed in 3 different ways using an 11 -point NRS (0 to 10 points representing 'no pain' to 'worst possible pain'). Subjects were asked to enter: 1) average pain intensity during the past week (7-day recall period); 2) the worst pain during activity over the past 24 hours; 3) pain intensity before and after a 40 meter walk (performance pain, before and after). The 40 meter fast paced walk test is a test of short distance walking activity, walking speed over short distances and changing direction during walking. Individuals taking the test should walk as quickly but as safely as possible, without running, along a walkway and then turn around, and repeat again for a total distance of 40 m (132 feet). The total time taken to walk the 40 meters is recorded.
Baseline, Week 52
Change From Baseline in Patient Global Assessment (PGA) of Arthritis of the Index Knee at Week 16
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 16
The PGA is a single item for evaluating overall osteoarthritis disease activity. PGA is assessed using an 11-point NRS of 0 to 10 points (representing best to worst disease status, respectively), with a 7-day recall period.
Baseline, Week 16
Change From Baseline in PGA of Arthritis of the Index Knee at Week 26
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 26
The PGA is a single item for evaluating overall osteoarthritis disease activity. PGA is assessed using an 11-point NRS of 0 to 10 points (representing best to worst disease status, respectively), with a 7-day recall period.
Baseline, Week 26
Change From Baseline in PGA of Arthritis of the Index Knee at Week 52
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 52
The PGA is a single item for evaluating overall osteoarthritis disease activity. PGA is assessed using an 11-point NRS of 0 to 10 points (representing best to worst disease status, respectively), with a 7-day recall period.
Baseline, Week 52
Change From Baseline in Cartilage Volume of the Index Knee at Week 26
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 26
Cartilage volume of the global knee, the medial central condyle + plateau, and the medial condyle + plateau was measured using MRI.
Baseline, Week 26
Change From Baseline in Cartilage Volume of the Index Knee at Week 52
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 52
Cartilage volume of the global knee, the medial central condyle + plateau, and the medial condyle + plateau was measured using MRI.
Baseline, Week 52
Change From Baseline in Cartilage Thickness of the Index Knee at Week 26
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 26
Cartilage thickness of the global knee, the medial central condyle + plateau, and the medial condyle + plateau was measured using MRI.
Baseline, Week 26
Change From Baseline in Cartilage Thickness of the Index Knee at Week 52
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 52
Cartilage thickness of the global knee, the medial central condyle + plateau, and the medial condyle + plateau was measured using MRI.
Baseline, Week 52
Outcome Measures in Rheumatology Clinical Trials/Osteoarthritis Research Society International (OMERACT/OARSI) Response Rate at Week 16
Time Frame: Week 16
Percentage of participants classified as OMERACT-OARSI responders at Week 16. A subject was considered an OMERACT-OARSI responder if any of the following 3 criteria were met: 1. WOMAC Pain (in 0 - 100 scale) improvement ≥ 50% and absolute reduction ≥ 20 as compared to the baseline; or 2. WOMAC Function (in normalized 0 - 100 scale) improvement ≥ 50% and absolute reduction ≥ 20 as compared to the baseline; or 3. At least 2 of the following 3 are met: WOMAC Pain improvement ≥ 20% and absolute reduction (in normalized 0 - 100 scale) ≥ 10 as compared to the baseline; WOMAC Function improvement ≥ 20% and absolute reduction (in normalized 0 - 100 scale) ≥ 10 as compared to the baseline; PGA improvement ≥ 20% and absolute change (in normalized 0 - 100 scale) ≥ 10 as compared to the baseline. Response rate 95% confidence interval based on normal approximation.
Week 16
Outcome Measures in Rheumatology Clinical Trials/Osteoarthritis Research Society International (OMERACT/OARSI) Response Rate at Week 26
Time Frame: Week 26
Percentage of participants classified as OMERACT-OARSI responders at Week 26. A subject was considered an OMERACT-OARSI responder if any of the following 3 criteria were met: 1. WOMAC Pain (in 0 - 100 scale) improvement ≥ 50% and absolute reduction ≥ 20 as compared to the baseline; or 2. WOMAC Function (in normalized 0 - 100 scale) improvement ≥ 50% and absolute reduction ≥ 20 as compared to the baseline; or 3. At least 2 of the following 3 are met: WOMAC Pain improvement ≥ 20% and absolute reduction (in normalized 0 - 100 scale) ≥ 10 as compared to the baseline; WOMAC Function improvement ≥ 20% and absolute reduction (in normalized 0 - 100 scale) ≥ 10 as compared to the baseline; PGA improvement ≥ 20% and absolute change (in normalized 0 - 100 scale) ≥ 10 as compared to the baseline. Response rate 95% confidence interval based on normal approximation.
Week 26
Outcome Measures in Rheumatology Clinical Trials/Osteoarthritis Research Society International (OMERACT/OARSI) Response Rate at Week 52
Time Frame: Week 52
Percentage of participants classified as OMERACT-OARSI responders at Week 52. A subject was considered an OMERACT-OARSI responder if any of the following 3 criteria were met: 1. WOMAC Pain (in 0 - 100 scale) improvement ≥ 50% and absolute reduction ≥ 20 as compared to the baseline; or 2. WOMAC Function (in normalized 0 - 100 scale) improvement ≥ 50% and absolute reduction ≥ 20 as compared to the baseline; or 3. At least 2 of the following 3 are met: WOMAC Pain improvement ≥ 20% and absolute reduction (in normalized 0 - 100 scale) ≥ 10 as compared to the baseline; WOMAC Function improvement ≥ 20% and absolute reduction (in normalized 0 - 100 scale) ≥ 10 as compared to the baseline; PGA improvement ≥ 20% and absolute change (in normalized 0 - 100 scale) ≥ 10 as compared to the baseline. Response rate 95% confidence interval based on normal approximation.
Week 52

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Investigators

  • Study Chair: Marc Levesque, MD, AbbVie

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

June 4, 2014

Primary Completion (Actual)

June 7, 2016

Study Completion (Actual)

December 13, 2016

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 13, 2014

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 13, 2014

First Posted (Estimate)

March 14, 2014

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

August 28, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 9, 2019

Last Verified

January 1, 2017

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • M13-741
  • 2013-003467-60 (EudraCT Number)

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Knee Osteoarthritis

Clinical Trials on Placebo

Subscribe