- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT02087904
A Study Evaluating the Safety, Efficacy, and Pharmacodynamic Effects of ABT-981 in Patients With Knee Osteoarthritis
August 9, 2019 updated by: AbbVie
A Phase 2a Study Evaluating the Safety, Efficacy, and Pharmacodynamic Effects of ABT-981 in Patients With Knee Osteoarthritis
A Phase 2a, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, parallel group, placebo-controlled study to evaluate the safety, tolerability, efficacy and pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic effect of ABT-981 in patients with symptomatic, radiographic, and inflammatory knee osteoarthritis.
Study Overview
Status
Completed
Intervention / Treatment
Study Type
Interventional
Enrollment (Actual)
350
Phase
- Phase 2
Participation Criteria
Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
35 years to 74 years (Adult, Older Adult)
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Genders Eligible for Study
All
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Radiographic knee osteoarthritis with Kellgren-Lawrence Grade 2 or 3
- Body Mass Index (BMI) 18-34 kg/m2
- One or more clinical signs and symptoms of active inflammation in the index knee
Exclusion Criteria:
- History of allergic reaction to any constituents of the study drug, or to any Immunoglobulin G (IgG)-containing product
- History of anaphylactic reaction to any agent
- Significant trauma or surgery to the index knee
- Severe knee malalignment
- Any uncontrolled medical illness or an unstable treatment or therapy
Study Plan
This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Quadruple
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Placebo Comparator: Placebo
|
|
|
Experimental: ABT-981 low dose
25 mg ABT-981 subcutaneous (SC) every 2 weeks (E2W)
|
Other Names:
|
|
Experimental: ABT-981 medium dose
100 mg ABT-981 SC E2W
|
Other Names:
|
|
Experimental: ABT-981 high dose
200 mg ABT-981 SC E2W
|
Other Names:
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Scores of the Index Knee at Week 16
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 16
|
The WOMAC was developed to assess pain, stiffness, and physical function in subjects with hip and/or knee osteoarthritis.
The WOMAC consists of 24 items divided into 3 subscales: Pain (5 items); Stiffness (2 items); and Physical Function (17 items).
Each item is rated on an 11-point (0 to 10) numerical rating scale (NRS).
The pain sub-score has a range of 0 (no pain) to 50 (maximum pain).
A negative change from baseline indicates improvement.
|
Baseline, Week 16
|
|
Change From Baseline in Quantitative Synovitis of the Index Knee at Week 26
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 26
|
Change in synovitis of the index knee was evaluated using quantitative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) measurements.
MRI quantitative synovitis of the index knee was defined by mean synovial membrane thickness.
|
Baseline, Week 26
|
|
Change From Baseline in Effusion Volume of the Index Knee at Week 26
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 26
|
Baseline, Week 26
|
|
|
Change From Baseline in Whole-Organ Magnetic Resonance Imaging Score (WORMS) Semi-Quantitative Synovitis/Effusion Score of the Index Knee at Week 26
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 26
|
Semi-quantitative synovitis/effusion volume WORMS scores were scored as normal (0), < 33% of maximum estimated distention (1), 33% - 66% of maximum estimated distention (2), or > 66% of maximum estimated distention (3).
|
Baseline, Week 26
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in WOMAC Physical Function Scores of the Index Knee at Week 16
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 16
|
The WOMAC was developed to assess pain, stiffness, and physical function in subjects with hip and/or knee osteoarthritis.
The WOMAC consists of 24 items divided into 3 subscales: Pain (5 items); Stiffness (2 items); and Physical Function (17 items).
Each item is rated on an 11-point (0 to 10) NRS.
The WOMAC physical function subscale score was 0 (normal) to 170 (least physical function).
A negative change from baseline indicates improvement.
|
Baseline, Week 16
|
|
Change From Baseline in WOMAC Physical Function Scores of the Index Knee at Week 26
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 26
|
The WOMAC was developed to assess pain, stiffness, and physical function in subjects with hip and/or knee osteoarthritis.
The WOMAC consists of 24 items divided into 3 subscales: Pain (5 items); Stiffness (2 items); and Physical Function (17 items).
Each item is rated on an 11-point (0 to 10) NRS.
The WOMAC physical function subscale score was 0 (normal) to 170 (least physical function).
A negative change from baseline indicates improvement.
|
Baseline, Week 26
|
|
Change From Baseline in WOMAC Physical Function Scores of the Index Knee at Week 52
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 52
|
The WOMAC was developed to assess pain, stiffness, and physical function in subjects with hip and/or knee osteoarthritis.
The WOMAC consists of 24 items divided into 3 subscales: Pain (5 items); Stiffness (2 items); and Physical Function (17 items).
Each item is rated on an 11-point (0 to 10) NRS.
The WOMAC physical function subscale score was 0 (normal) to 170 (least physical function).
A negative change from baseline indicates improvement.
|
Baseline, Week 52
|
|
Change From Baseline in WOMAC Pain Scores of the Index Knee at Week 26
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 26
|
The WOMAC was developed to assess pain, stiffness, and physical function in subjects with hip and/or knee osteoarthritis.
The WOMAC consists of 24 items divided into 3 subscales: Pain (5 items); Stiffness (2 items); and Physical Function (17 items).
Each item is rated on an 11-point (0 to 10) numerical rating scale (NRS).
The pain sub-score has a range of 0 (no pain) to 50 (maximum pain).
A negative change from baseline indicates improvement.
|
Baseline, Week 26
|
|
Change From Baseline in WOMAC Pain Scores of the Index Knee at Week 52
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 52
|
The WOMAC was developed to assess pain, stiffness, and physical function in subjects with hip and/or knee osteoarthritis.
The WOMAC consists of 24 items divided into 3 subscales: Pain (5 items); Stiffness (2 items); and Physical Function (17 items).
Each item is rated on an 11-point (0 to 10) numerical rating scale (NRS).
The pain sub-score has a range of 0 (no pain) to 50 (maximum pain).
A negative change from baseline indicates improvement.
|
Baseline, Week 52
|
|
Change From Baseline in Global Total Bone Marrow Lesion (BML) Score of the Index Knee Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) at Week 26
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 26
|
BMLs in 15 regions were measured with MRI, and graded as 0 (normal), 1 (mild; < 25% of region), 2 (moderate; 25% - 50% of region), or 3 (severe; > 50% of region).
The global total BML score was the sum of the 15 component scores, and ranged from 0 (normal) to 45 (severe).
|
Baseline, Week 26
|
|
Change From Baseline in Global Total BML Score of the Index Knee MRI at Week 52
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 52
|
BMLs in 15 regions were measured with MRI, and graded as 0 (normal), 1 (mild; < 25% of region), 2 (moderate; 25% - 50% of region), or 3 (severe; > 50% of region).
The global total BML score was the sum of the 15 component scores, and ranged from 0 (normal) to 45 (severe).
|
Baseline, Week 52
|
|
Change From Baseline in Index Knee Intermittent and Constant Osteoarthritis Pain (ICOAP) Scores at Week 16
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 16
|
The ICOAP is a multidimensional osteoarthritis-specific measure designed to comprehensively evaluate the pain experience in patients with hip or knee osteoarthritis.
The ICOAP includes 11 items (5 constant pain items; 6 intermittent pain items).
Each item is rated on a 0 to 4 point scale with a 7-day recall period.
The raw maximum intermittent pain score ranges from 0 to 24, transformed to a reported scale of 0 (no pain) to 100 (worst pain).
The raw maximum constant pain score ranges from 0 to 20, transformed to a reported scale of 0 (no pain) to 100 (worst pain).
|
Baseline, Week 16
|
|
Change From Baseline in Index Knee ICOAP Scores at Week 26
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 26
|
The ICOAP is a multidimensional osteoarthritis-specific measure designed to comprehensively evaluate the pain experience in patients with hip or knee osteoarthritis.
The ICOAP includes 11 items (5 constant pain items; 6 intermittent pain items).
Each item is rated on a 0 to 4 point scale with a 7-day recall period.
The raw maximum intermittent pain score ranges from 0 to 24, transformed to a reported scale of 0 (no pain) to 100 (worst pain).
The raw maximum constant pain score ranges from 0 to 20, transformed to a reported scale of 0 (no pain) to 100 (worst pain).
|
Baseline, Week 26
|
|
Change From Baseline in Index Knee ICOAP Scores at Week 52
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 52
|
The ICOAP is a multidimensional osteoarthritis-specific measure designed to comprehensively evaluate the pain experience in patients with hip or knee osteoarthritis.
The ICOAP includes 11 items (5 constant pain items; 6 intermittent pain items).
Each item is rated on a 0 to 4 point scale with a 7-day recall period.
The raw maximum intermittent pain score ranges from 0 to 24, transformed to a reported scale of 0 (no pain) to 100 (worst pain).
The raw maximum constant pain score ranges from 0 to 20, transformed to a reported scale of 0 (no pain) to 100 (worst pain).
|
Baseline, Week 52
|
|
Change From Baseline In Index Knee Pain Intensity at Week 16
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 16
|
The index knee pain intensity was assessed in 3 different ways using an 11 -point NRS (0 to 10 points representing 'no pain' to 'worst possible pain').
Subjects were asked to enter: 1) average pain intensity during the past week (7-day recall period); 2) the worst pain during activity over the past 24 hours; 3) pain intensity before and after a 40 meter walk (performance pain, before and after).
The 40 meter fast paced walk test is a test of short distance walking activity, walking speed over short distances and changing direction during walking.
Individuals taking the test should walk as quickly but as safely as possible, without running, along a walkway and then turn around, and repeat again for a total distance of 40 m (132 feet).
The total time taken to walk the 40 meters is recorded.
|
Baseline, Week 16
|
|
Change From Baseline In Index Knee Pain Intensity at Week 26
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 26
|
The index knee pain intensity was assessed in 3 different ways using an 11 -point NRS (0 to 10 points representing 'no pain' to 'worst possible pain').
Subjects were asked to enter: 1) average pain intensity during the past week (7-day recall period); 2) the worst pain during activity over the past 24 hours; 3) pain intensity before and after a 40 meter walk (performance pain, before and after).
The 40 meter fast paced walk test is a test of short distance walking activity, walking speed over short distances and changing direction during walking.
Individuals taking the test should walk as quickly but as safely as possible, without running, along a walkway and then turn around, and repeat again for a total distance of 40 m (132 feet).
The total time taken to walk the 40 meters is recorded.
|
Baseline, Week 26
|
|
Change From Baseline In Index Knee Pain Intensity at Week 52
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 52
|
The index knee pain intensity was assessed in 3 different ways using an 11 -point NRS (0 to 10 points representing 'no pain' to 'worst possible pain').
Subjects were asked to enter: 1) average pain intensity during the past week (7-day recall period); 2) the worst pain during activity over the past 24 hours; 3) pain intensity before and after a 40 meter walk (performance pain, before and after).
The 40 meter fast paced walk test is a test of short distance walking activity, walking speed over short distances and changing direction during walking.
Individuals taking the test should walk as quickly but as safely as possible, without running, along a walkway and then turn around, and repeat again for a total distance of 40 m (132 feet).
The total time taken to walk the 40 meters is recorded.
|
Baseline, Week 52
|
|
Change From Baseline in Patient Global Assessment (PGA) of Arthritis of the Index Knee at Week 16
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 16
|
The PGA is a single item for evaluating overall osteoarthritis disease activity.
PGA is assessed using an 11-point NRS of 0 to 10 points (representing best to worst disease status, respectively), with a 7-day recall period.
|
Baseline, Week 16
|
|
Change From Baseline in PGA of Arthritis of the Index Knee at Week 26
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 26
|
The PGA is a single item for evaluating overall osteoarthritis disease activity.
PGA is assessed using an 11-point NRS of 0 to 10 points (representing best to worst disease status, respectively), with a 7-day recall period.
|
Baseline, Week 26
|
|
Change From Baseline in PGA of Arthritis of the Index Knee at Week 52
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 52
|
The PGA is a single item for evaluating overall osteoarthritis disease activity.
PGA is assessed using an 11-point NRS of 0 to 10 points (representing best to worst disease status, respectively), with a 7-day recall period.
|
Baseline, Week 52
|
|
Change From Baseline in Cartilage Volume of the Index Knee at Week 26
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 26
|
Cartilage volume of the global knee, the medial central condyle + plateau, and the medial condyle + plateau was measured using MRI.
|
Baseline, Week 26
|
|
Change From Baseline in Cartilage Volume of the Index Knee at Week 52
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 52
|
Cartilage volume of the global knee, the medial central condyle + plateau, and the medial condyle + plateau was measured using MRI.
|
Baseline, Week 52
|
|
Change From Baseline in Cartilage Thickness of the Index Knee at Week 26
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 26
|
Cartilage thickness of the global knee, the medial central condyle + plateau, and the medial condyle + plateau was measured using MRI.
|
Baseline, Week 26
|
|
Change From Baseline in Cartilage Thickness of the Index Knee at Week 52
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 52
|
Cartilage thickness of the global knee, the medial central condyle + plateau, and the medial condyle + plateau was measured using MRI.
|
Baseline, Week 52
|
|
Outcome Measures in Rheumatology Clinical Trials/Osteoarthritis Research Society International (OMERACT/OARSI) Response Rate at Week 16
Time Frame: Week 16
|
Percentage of participants classified as OMERACT-OARSI responders at Week 16.
A subject was considered an OMERACT-OARSI responder if any of the following 3 criteria were met: 1. WOMAC Pain (in 0 - 100 scale) improvement ≥ 50% and absolute reduction ≥ 20 as compared to the baseline; or 2. WOMAC Function (in normalized 0 - 100 scale) improvement ≥ 50% and absolute reduction ≥ 20 as compared to the baseline; or 3.
At least 2 of the following 3 are met: WOMAC Pain improvement ≥ 20% and absolute reduction (in normalized 0 - 100 scale) ≥ 10 as compared to the baseline; WOMAC Function improvement ≥ 20% and absolute reduction (in normalized 0 - 100 scale) ≥ 10 as compared to the baseline; PGA improvement ≥ 20% and absolute change (in normalized 0 - 100 scale) ≥ 10 as compared to the baseline.
Response rate 95% confidence interval based on normal approximation.
|
Week 16
|
|
Outcome Measures in Rheumatology Clinical Trials/Osteoarthritis Research Society International (OMERACT/OARSI) Response Rate at Week 26
Time Frame: Week 26
|
Percentage of participants classified as OMERACT-OARSI responders at Week 26.
A subject was considered an OMERACT-OARSI responder if any of the following 3 criteria were met: 1. WOMAC Pain (in 0 - 100 scale) improvement ≥ 50% and absolute reduction ≥ 20 as compared to the baseline; or 2. WOMAC Function (in normalized 0 - 100 scale) improvement ≥ 50% and absolute reduction ≥ 20 as compared to the baseline; or 3.
At least 2 of the following 3 are met: WOMAC Pain improvement ≥ 20% and absolute reduction (in normalized 0 - 100 scale) ≥ 10 as compared to the baseline; WOMAC Function improvement ≥ 20% and absolute reduction (in normalized 0 - 100 scale) ≥ 10 as compared to the baseline; PGA improvement ≥ 20% and absolute change (in normalized 0 - 100 scale) ≥ 10 as compared to the baseline.
Response rate 95% confidence interval based on normal approximation.
|
Week 26
|
|
Outcome Measures in Rheumatology Clinical Trials/Osteoarthritis Research Society International (OMERACT/OARSI) Response Rate at Week 52
Time Frame: Week 52
|
Percentage of participants classified as OMERACT-OARSI responders at Week 52.
A subject was considered an OMERACT-OARSI responder if any of the following 3 criteria were met: 1. WOMAC Pain (in 0 - 100 scale) improvement ≥ 50% and absolute reduction ≥ 20 as compared to the baseline; or 2. WOMAC Function (in normalized 0 - 100 scale) improvement ≥ 50% and absolute reduction ≥ 20 as compared to the baseline; or 3.
At least 2 of the following 3 are met: WOMAC Pain improvement ≥ 20% and absolute reduction (in normalized 0 - 100 scale) ≥ 10 as compared to the baseline; WOMAC Function improvement ≥ 20% and absolute reduction (in normalized 0 - 100 scale) ≥ 10 as compared to the baseline; PGA improvement ≥ 20% and absolute change (in normalized 0 - 100 scale) ≥ 10 as compared to the baseline.
Response rate 95% confidence interval based on normal approximation.
|
Week 52
|
Collaborators and Investigators
This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.
Sponsor
Investigators
- Study Chair: Marc Levesque, MD, AbbVie
Publications and helpful links
The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.
Study record dates
These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
June 4, 2014
Primary Completion (Actual)
June 7, 2016
Study Completion (Actual)
December 13, 2016
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
March 13, 2014
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
March 13, 2014
First Posted (Estimate)
March 14, 2014
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
August 28, 2019
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
August 9, 2019
Last Verified
January 1, 2017
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- M13-741
- 2013-003467-60 (EudraCT Number)
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Knee Osteoarthritis
-
Istanbul University - CerrahpasaCompletedKnee Osteoarthritis | Knee Osteoarthritis (Knee OA)Turkey (Türkiye)
-
Edin MešanovićCompletedOsteoarthritis | Osteoarthritis of the Knee | Osteoarthritis of Knee | Osteoarthritis of the Knees | Osteoarthritis (OA) of the Knee | Osteoarthritis Knee | Osteoarthritis in the Knee | Osteoarthritis of Knee JointBosnia and Herzegovina
-
Golden Jubilee National HospitalJohnson & Johnson; DePuy OrthopaedicsNot yet recruitingOsteoarthritis | Knee Osteoarthritis | Osteoarthritis (OA) | Osteo Arthritis | Osteoarthritis in the Knee | Osteoarthritis (Knee) | Osteo Arthritis of the KneeUnited Kingdom
-
Dr. David WassersteinSunnybrook Research InstituteRecruitingKnee Osteoarthritis (Knee OA) | Knee Osteoarthritis (OA)Canada
-
LifeBridge HealthMicroPort Orthopedics Inc.; Rubin Institute for Advanced OrthopedicsRecruitingKnee Osteoarthritis | Osteoarthritis, Knee | Knee Pain Chronic | Arthropathy of Knee Joint | Knee Disease | Osteoarthritis Knees Both | Osteoarthritis Knee Left | Osteoarthritis Knee RightUnited States
-
Lucas R. Cusumano, MDNot yet recruitingKnee Osteoarthritis | Knee Discomfort | Knee Pain Chronic | Knee Swelling PainUnited States
-
Emory UniversityVertex Pharmaceuticals IncorporatedNot yet recruitingKnee Osteoarthritis | Knee ArthritisUnited States
-
VA Office of Research and DevelopmentNot yet recruitingKnee Osteoarthritis (Knee OA)United States
-
The Hong Kong Polytechnic UniversityChinese University of Hong Kong; Zhujiang HospitalNot yet recruitingKnee Osteoarthritis (Knee OA)
-
University of MiamiNot yet recruiting
Clinical Trials on Placebo
-
SamA Pharmaceutical Co., LtdUnknownAcute Bronchitis | Acute Upper Respiratory Tract InfectionKorea, Republic of
-
National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA)CompletedCannabis UseUnited States
-
AstraZenecaParexel; Spandauer Damm 130; 14050; Berlin, GermanyCompletedMale Subjects With Type II Diabetes (T2DM)Germany
-
AkesoNot yet recruitingAtopic DermatitisChina
-
Heptares Therapeutics LimitedCompletedPharmacokinetics | Safety IssuesUnited Kingdom
-
GlaxoSmithKlineCompletedPulmonary Disease, Chronic ObstructiveUnited Kingdom, Netherlands
-
Shijiazhuang Yiling Pharmaceutical Co. LtdXuanwu Hospital, BeijingCompleted
-
GlaxoSmithKlineCompletedInfections, BacterialUnited States
-
Chong Kun Dang PharmaceuticalUnknownHypertension | DyslipidemiasKorea, Republic of