Walking Training With Partial Body Weight Support on Static and Dynamic Surfaces in Stroke Survivers

March 7, 2016 updated by: Gabriela Lopes Gama, Universidade Cruzeiro do Sul

Walking Training With Partial Body Weight Support on Static and Dynamic Surfaces in Individuals With Hemiparesis Due to Stroke

The purpose of this study is evaluate the effects of walking training with partial body weight support on static (floor) and dynamic (treadmill) surfaces in individuals with hemiparesis due to stroke. For this purpose, two training protocols will be employed in three experimental groups: G1 will do the walking training with partial body weight support on static surfaces and G2 will do the walking training with partial body weight support on dynamic surfaces

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

28

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • São Paulo, Brazil
        • Cruzeiro do Sul University

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

40 years to 75 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • One-sided hemiparesis, No heart disease (or medical clearance to participate in the study), No orthopedic impairments and / or neurological symptoms that may alter the the gait, no history of thrombophlebitis or deep vein thrombosis, Ability to understand and follow verbal commands, Can walk alone or with canes of approximately 10 m; Spasticity degree mild to moderate in the affected lower limb with levels of classification between 0 and 2 in the Ashworth spasticity scale modified

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Heart frequency increase more than 75% of the maximum or have any other general instability during training that may lead risk for the health during the training,

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Factorial Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Static surface
The subjects will do the walking training with partial body weight support on static surface. The will be submitted to three weekly training sessions of approximately 45 minutes each , for six weeks , totaling 18 sessions
During all session time the subject will walk on the floor with partial body weight support. This protocol will be repeated in all sessions.
Other Names:
  • floor walking training
Active Comparator: dynamic surface
The subjects will do the walking training with partial body weight support on dynamic surface. The will be submitted to three weekly training sessions of approximately 45 minutes each , for six weeks , totaling 18 sessions
During all session time the subject will walk on the treadmill with partial body weight support. This protocol will be repeated in all sessions.
Other Names:
  • Treadmill Training

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change from Baseline in the gait velocity
Time Frame: Baseline, immediately after and six weeks after training cessation.
Speed at which subjects walked measured by the 10 meters test
Baseline, immediately after and six weeks after training cessation.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Distribution of body weight
Time Frame: Baseline, immediately after and six weeks after training cessation.
Body weight Distribution measured while subjects are in a static position on two force platforms.
Baseline, immediately after and six weeks after training cessation.
Functional independence
Time Frame: Baseline, immediately after and six weeks after training cessation.
a score was assigned for each everyday activity, according to the amount of assistance required to perform it. Measured by a clinical scale (Functional Independence Measure Scale.
Baseline, immediately after and six weeks after training cessation.
Lower limb recovery
Time Frame: Baseline, immediately after and six weeks after training cessation.
Measured by a clinical scale (Fulgy Meyer).
Baseline, immediately after and six weeks after training cessation.
Endurance
Time Frame: Baseline, immediately after and six weeks after training cessation.
Measured by the 6 minutes walking test
Baseline, immediately after and six weeks after training cessation.

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Spacial and temporal variables
Time Frame: Baseline, immediately after and six weeks after training cessation.
Measured while subjects are walking at a comfortable speed
Baseline, immediately after and six weeks after training cessation.
Center of Pressure
Time Frame: Baseline, immediately after and six weeks after training cessation.
Behavior of the Center of Pressure in gait and gait initiation measured by the force plates during the gait and gait initiation. Center of Pressure distance and seed displacement will be measured during the task.
Baseline, immediately after and six weeks after training cessation.
articular and segment angles
Time Frame: Baseline, immediately after and six weeks after training cessation.
Measured while subjects are walking at a comfortable speed
Baseline, immediately after and six weeks after training cessation.

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

March 1, 2014

Primary Completion (Actual)

July 1, 2015

Study Completion (Actual)

July 1, 2015

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 10, 2014

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 13, 2014

First Posted (Estimate)

March 14, 2014

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

March 8, 2016

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 7, 2016

Last Verified

July 1, 2015

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Stroke

Clinical Trials on Static surface

3
Subscribe