- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT02093520
The MiDAS ENCORE Study
October 31, 2017 updated by: Vertos Medical, Inc.
MILD® Percutaneous Image-Guided Lumbar Decompression Versus Epidural Steroid Injections in Patients With Lumbar Spinal Stenosis Exhibiting Neurogenic Claudication
Study Objective: To compare patient outcomes following treatment with either the MILD procedure or epidural steroid injections (ESIs) in patients with painful lumbar spinal stenosis exhibiting neurogenic claudication and having verified ligamentum flavum hypertrophy as a contributing factor.
Study Overview
Status
Completed
Intervention / Treatment
Study Type
Interventional
Enrollment (Actual)
302
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.
Study Locations
-
-
California
-
Chula Vista, California, United States, 91914
- Synovation Medical Group
-
Fresno, California, United States, 93710
- Spine Intervention Medical Group/Fresno Surgical Hospital
-
Murrieta, California, United States, 92563
- The Spine Institute
-
Newport Beach, California, United States, 92660
- Newport Beach Headache and Pain
-
-
Illinois
-
Bloomington, Illinois, United States, 61701
- Millennium Pain Center
-
-
Kentucky
-
Frankfort, Kentucky, United States, 40601
- Frankfort Pain Clinic
-
-
Michigan
-
Brownstown Charter Township, Michigan, United States, 48183
- MI Interventional Pain Center
-
Ypsilanti, Michigan, United States, 48198
- Michigan Pain Specialist
-
-
Minnesota
-
Rochester, Minnesota, United States, 55905
- Mayo Clinic Pain Management
-
-
New Jersey
-
Shrewsbury, New Jersey, United States, 07702
- Premier Pain
-
-
South Carolina
-
Mount Pleasant, South Carolina, United States, 29464
- Southern Spine Institute
-
Myrtle Beach, South Carolina, United States, 29572
- SC Spine and Pain Specialists
-
-
Participation Criteria
Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
65 years and older (Older Adult)
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Genders Eligible for Study
All
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- 65 years or older and a Medicare beneficiary.
- Patients experiencing neurogenic claudication symptoms for at least 3 months duration which has failed to respond or poorly responded to physical therapy, home exercise programs, and oral analgesics.
LSS with neurogenic claudication diagnosed via:
- Symptomatic diagnosis and
- Radiologic evidence of LSS with unilateral or bilateral ligamentum flavum >2.5mm confirmed by pre-op MRI or CT performed within 12 months of baseline visit.
- Patients with comorbid conditions commonly associated with spinal stenosis, such as osteophytes, facet hypertrophy, minor spondylolisthesis, foraminal stenosis, and/or disk protrusion may be included unless the treating physician has determined that the condition is too advanced.
- Available to complete 6 month and one year follow-up visits.
Exclusion Criteria:
- ODI Score < 31 (0-100 ODI Scale).
- NPRS Score < 5 (0-10 NPRS Scale).
- Prior surgery at any treatment level.
- History of recent spinal fractures with current related pain symptoms.
- Patients with Grade III or higher spondylolisthesis.
- Motor deficit or disabling back and/or leg pain from causes other than LSS neurogenic claudication (e.g., acute compression fracture, metabolic neuropathy, or vascular claudication symptoms, etc.).
- Unable to walk ≥ 10 feet unaided before being limited by pain. In this context, 'unaided' means without the use of a cane, walker, railing, wall, another person or any other means of walking assistance.
- Patients previously randomized and/or treated in this clinical study.
- Patients that have previously received the MILD procedure.
- ESI during eight weeks prior to study enrollment.
- Epidural lipomatosis (if it is deemed to be a significant contributor of canal narrowing by the physician).
- On (or pending) Workman's Compensation or known to be considering litigation associated with back pain.
Study Plan
This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Active Comparator: MILD
The MILD procedure is an image-guided minimally-invasive lumbar decompression
|
The percutaneous procedure is performed under fluoroscopic guidance to effect a lumbar decompression with minimal surrounding tissue and bone disruption.
The mild® Device Kit is utilized to access, capture and remove bone and tissue.
Other Names:
|
|
Active Comparator: Epidural Steroid Injection (ESI)
An epidural steroid injection (ESI) is a combination of a corticosteroid with a local anesthetic pain relief medicine.
|
Injection of epidural steroids into the lumbar spine
Other Names:
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants Who Achieved a Clinically Significant Improvement in the Oswestry Disability Index at 12 Months
Time Frame: 12 months
|
Proportion of ODI Responders from baseline to one year follow-up in the treatment group versus the proportion of ODI Responders from baseline to one year follow-up in the control group.
ODI Responders are defined as those patients achieving the validated Minimal Important Change in ODI score from baseline to follow-up as a clinically significant efficacy threshold.
|
12 months
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants Who Acheived a Clinical Significant Improvement in the Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS) at 12 Months
Time Frame: 12 months
|
Proportion of NPRS Responders from baseline to one year follow-up in each of the two treatment groups using validated Minimal Important Change value as the clinically significant efficacy threshold.
|
12 months
|
|
Number of Participants Who Achieved a Clinically Significant Improvement in the Zurich Claudication Questionnaire (ZCQ) at 12 Months
Time Frame: 12 months
|
Proportion of ZCQ Responders from baseline to one year follow-up in each of the two treatment groups using validated Minimal Important Change value as the clinically significant efficacy threshold.
|
12 months
|
Collaborators and Investigators
This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.
Sponsor
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Ramsin Benyamin, MD, AAPM; ASIPP; ISIS; ASA
- Principal Investigator: Peter Staats, MD, AAPM; ASIPP; ASA
Publications and helpful links
The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.
General Publications
- Staats PS, Chafin TB, Golovac S, Kim CK, Li S, Richardson WB, Vallejo R, Wahezi SE, Washabaugh EP 3rd, Benyamin RM; MiDAS ENCORE Investigators. Long-Term Safety and Efficacy of Minimally Invasive Lumbar Decompression Procedure for the Treatment of Lumbar Spinal Stenosis With Neurogenic Claudication: 2-Year Results of MiDAS ENCORE. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2018 Oct;43(7):789-794. doi: 10.1097/AAP.0000000000000868.
- Benyamin RM, Staats PS, MiDAS Encore I. MILD(R) Is an Effective Treatment for Lumbar Spinal Stenosis with Neurogenic Claudication: MiDAS ENCORE Randomized Controlled Trial. Pain Physician. 2016 May;19(4):229-42.
- Staats PS, Benyamin RM; MiDAS ENCORE Investigators. MiDAS ENCORE: Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial Report of 6-Month Results. Pain Physician. 2016 Feb;19(2):25-38.
Study record dates
These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.
Study Major Dates
Study Start
May 1, 2014
Primary Completion (Actual)
May 1, 2016
Study Completion (Actual)
October 1, 2017
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
March 18, 2014
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
March 20, 2014
First Posted (Estimate)
March 21, 2014
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
December 6, 2017
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
October 31, 2017
Last Verified
May 1, 2017
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- MiDAS ENCORE
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Spinal Stenosis, Lumbar Region, With Neurogenic Claudication
-
Vertos Medical, Inc.Active, not recruitingSpinal Stenosis, Lumbar Region, With Neurogenic ClaudicationUnited States
-
VertiFlex, IncorporatedWithdrawnSpinal Stenosis, Lumbar Region With Neurogenic ClaudicationUnited States
-
Marshfield Clinic Research FoundationTerminatedSpinal Stenosis, Lumbar Region, With Neurogenic ClaudicationUnited States
-
Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria de la Fundación...CompletedSpinal Stenosis, Lumbar Region, With Neurogenic ClaudicationSpain
-
University of ValenciaHospital General Universitario de ValenciaCompletedLumbar Spinal Stenosis | Degenerative Lumbar Spondylolisthesis | Neurogenic ClaudicationSpain
-
Uppsala UniversityCompletedSpinal Stenosis | Spinal Stenosis Lumbar | Degeneration Spine | Degeneration Lumbar Spine | Neurogenic Claudication Co-Occurrent and Due to Spinal Stenosis of Lumbar Region | Pseudoclaudication SyndromeSweden
-
Novosibirsk Research Institute of Traumatology...TerminatedSpinal Stenosis Lumbar Canal With Neurogenic Claudication (Diagnosis)Russian Federation
-
Innovative Surgical DesignsSuspendedLumbar Spinal Stenosis | Spondylolisthesis, Grade 1 | Neurogenic ClaudicationUnited States
-
Asan Medical CenterActive, not recruitingSarcopenia | Lumbar Spinal Stenosis | Neurogenic ClaudicationKorea, Republic of
-
Yungjin Pharm. Co., Ltd.CompletedNeurologic Claudication in Patients With Lumbar Spinal StenosisKorea, Republic of
Clinical Trials on MILD Procedure
-
Vertos Medical, Inc.CompletedLumbar Spinal StenosisUnited States
-
Vertos Medical, Inc.Active, not recruitingSpinal Stenosis, Lumbar Region, With Neurogenic ClaudicationUnited States
-
RenJi HospitalXiangya Hospital of Central South University; West China Hospital; Qilu Hospital... and other collaboratorsCompletedBrain Injuries | Craniocerebral TraumaChina
-
University of HelsinkiFinnish Cultural Foundation; University of Oulu; Finnish Work Environment Fund; Juho Vainio Foundation and other collaboratorsUnknownLow Back Pain | Low Back Pain, RecurrentFinland
-
Vertos Medical, Inc.Completed
-
Beijing Tiantan HospitalNot yet recruitingRemimazolam Mild Sedation | Healthy Brain and Glioma BrainChina
-
University of ChicagoTerminated
-
University of LeipzigCompletedCardiogenic Shock | Acute; Myocardial Infarction, ComplicationsGermany
-
University Hospital Schleswig-HolsteinUniversity of Leipzig; University of Jena; University of Hamburg-EppendorfTerminated
-
Medivance, Inc.Completed