The MiDAS ENCORE Study

October 31, 2017 updated by: Vertos Medical, Inc.

MILD® Percutaneous Image-Guided Lumbar Decompression Versus Epidural Steroid Injections in Patients With Lumbar Spinal Stenosis Exhibiting Neurogenic Claudication

Study Objective: To compare patient outcomes following treatment with either the MILD procedure or epidural steroid injections (ESIs) in patients with painful lumbar spinal stenosis exhibiting neurogenic claudication and having verified ligamentum flavum hypertrophy as a contributing factor.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

302

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • California
      • Chula Vista, California, United States, 91914
        • Synovation Medical Group
      • Fresno, California, United States, 93710
        • Spine Intervention Medical Group/Fresno Surgical Hospital
      • Murrieta, California, United States, 92563
        • The Spine Institute
      • Newport Beach, California, United States, 92660
        • Newport Beach Headache and Pain
    • Illinois
      • Bloomington, Illinois, United States, 61701
        • Millennium Pain Center
    • Kentucky
      • Frankfort, Kentucky, United States, 40601
        • Frankfort Pain Clinic
    • Michigan
      • Brownstown Charter Township, Michigan, United States, 48183
        • MI Interventional Pain Center
      • Ypsilanti, Michigan, United States, 48198
        • Michigan Pain Specialist
    • Minnesota
      • Rochester, Minnesota, United States, 55905
        • Mayo Clinic Pain Management
    • New Jersey
      • Shrewsbury, New Jersey, United States, 07702
        • Premier Pain
    • South Carolina
      • Mount Pleasant, South Carolina, United States, 29464
        • Southern Spine Institute
      • Myrtle Beach, South Carolina, United States, 29572
        • SC Spine and Pain Specialists

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

65 years and older (Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. 65 years or older and a Medicare beneficiary.
  2. Patients experiencing neurogenic claudication symptoms for at least 3 months duration which has failed to respond or poorly responded to physical therapy, home exercise programs, and oral analgesics.
  3. LSS with neurogenic claudication diagnosed via:

    1. Symptomatic diagnosis and
    2. Radiologic evidence of LSS with unilateral or bilateral ligamentum flavum >2.5mm confirmed by pre-op MRI or CT performed within 12 months of baseline visit.
  4. Patients with comorbid conditions commonly associated with spinal stenosis, such as osteophytes, facet hypertrophy, minor spondylolisthesis, foraminal stenosis, and/or disk protrusion may be included unless the treating physician has determined that the condition is too advanced.
  5. Available to complete 6 month and one year follow-up visits.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. ODI Score < 31 (0-100 ODI Scale).
  2. NPRS Score < 5 (0-10 NPRS Scale).
  3. Prior surgery at any treatment level.
  4. History of recent spinal fractures with current related pain symptoms.
  5. Patients with Grade III or higher spondylolisthesis.
  6. Motor deficit or disabling back and/or leg pain from causes other than LSS neurogenic claudication (e.g., acute compression fracture, metabolic neuropathy, or vascular claudication symptoms, etc.).
  7. Unable to walk ≥ 10 feet unaided before being limited by pain. In this context, 'unaided' means without the use of a cane, walker, railing, wall, another person or any other means of walking assistance.
  8. Patients previously randomized and/or treated in this clinical study.
  9. Patients that have previously received the MILD procedure.
  10. ESI during eight weeks prior to study enrollment.
  11. Epidural lipomatosis (if it is deemed to be a significant contributor of canal narrowing by the physician).
  12. On (or pending) Workman's Compensation or known to be considering litigation associated with back pain.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: MILD
The MILD procedure is an image-guided minimally-invasive lumbar decompression
The percutaneous procedure is performed under fluoroscopic guidance to effect a lumbar decompression with minimal surrounding tissue and bone disruption. The mild® Device Kit is utilized to access, capture and remove bone and tissue.
Other Names:
  • MILD lumbar decompression
Active Comparator: Epidural Steroid Injection (ESI)
An epidural steroid injection (ESI) is a combination of a corticosteroid with a local anesthetic pain relief medicine.
Injection of epidural steroids into the lumbar spine
Other Names:
  • ESI

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number of Participants Who Achieved a Clinically Significant Improvement in the Oswestry Disability Index at 12 Months
Time Frame: 12 months
Proportion of ODI Responders from baseline to one year follow-up in the treatment group versus the proportion of ODI Responders from baseline to one year follow-up in the control group. ODI Responders are defined as those patients achieving the validated Minimal Important Change in ODI score from baseline to follow-up as a clinically significant efficacy threshold.
12 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number of Participants Who Acheived a Clinical Significant Improvement in the Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS) at 12 Months
Time Frame: 12 months
Proportion of NPRS Responders from baseline to one year follow-up in each of the two treatment groups using validated Minimal Important Change value as the clinically significant efficacy threshold.
12 months
Number of Participants Who Achieved a Clinically Significant Improvement in the Zurich Claudication Questionnaire (ZCQ) at 12 Months
Time Frame: 12 months
Proportion of ZCQ Responders from baseline to one year follow-up in each of the two treatment groups using validated Minimal Important Change value as the clinically significant efficacy threshold.
12 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Ramsin Benyamin, MD, AAPM; ASIPP; ISIS; ASA
  • Principal Investigator: Peter Staats, MD, AAPM; ASIPP; ASA

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

May 1, 2014

Primary Completion (Actual)

May 1, 2016

Study Completion (Actual)

October 1, 2017

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 18, 2014

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 20, 2014

First Posted (Estimate)

March 21, 2014

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

December 6, 2017

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 31, 2017

Last Verified

May 1, 2017

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Spinal Stenosis, Lumbar Region, With Neurogenic Claudication

Clinical Trials on MILD Procedure

Subscribe