Comparison of Open and Minimally Invasive Surgical Techniques in the Treatment of Degenerative One-level Stenosis of Lumbar Spine

Prospective Comparative Study of Open and Minimally Invasive Surgical Techniques in the Treatment of Degenerative One-level Stenosis of Lumbar Spine

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the clinical and radiological results of surgical treatment of one-level central stenosis of the lumbar spine using traditional open approach (PLIF) and a minimally invasive procedure (MIS TLIF). According to the hypothesis, we assume that unilateral approach of MIS TLIF allows for adequate bilateral decompression of one-level central stenosis of the lumbar spine. Using MIS TLIF it is possible to perform reliable fixation of a spine segment and the formation of a complete intervertebral bone fusion. The long-term clinical results of surgical treatment with minimally invasive technologies (MIS TLIF) and traditional open approach (PLIF) suspected to be comparable.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

132

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Novosibirsk, Russian Federation, 630091
        • Novosibirsk Research Institute of Traumatology and Orthopaedics n.a. Ya.L. Tsivyan

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

16 years to 68 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • syndrome of mono- or polyradicular compression of the nerve roots with / without a reflex pain syndromes, caused by stenosis of one lumbar spine segment;
  • intermittent claudication caused by stenosis of one lumbar spine segment;
  • one-level spine stenosis in combination with local segment instability or degenerative spondylolisthesis at the same spine segment, requiring fusion in only one lumbar segment

Exclusion Criteria:

  • bilateral foraminal lumbar spine stenosis;
  • lumbar spine stenosis more than one-level;
  • spondylolisthesis II degree and more;
  • sagittal imbalance;
  • fusion the same lumbar spine segment after surgery previously;
  • other diseases of the spine, including trauma, tumor and inflammatory diseases of the lumbar spine, etc.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Health Services Research
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Minimally invasive fusion
Bilateral decompression using unilateral approach, MIS TLIF + screw fixation percutaneous
Bilateral decompression
On the one side - Wiltse approach, on the other side - percutaneous
Transpedicular Screw Fixation
Active Comparator: Open Fusion
Bilateral decompression, open fusion + screw fixation
Bilateral decompression
Transpedicular Screw Fixation
Traditional open surgery

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Oswestry Disability Index (ODI)
Time Frame: Day of hospital discharge (10-15 day after surgery)

Oswestry Disability Index - patient-reported physical and household activity. Minimum - 0 (the worst result, patient is not physically active). Maximum - 50 (the best result).

Improvement of ODI post-operatively as compared to baseline

Day of hospital discharge (10-15 day after surgery)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Oswestry Disability Index (ODI)
Time Frame: 3, 6 and 12 months

Oswestry Disability Index - patient-reported physical and household activity. Minimum - 0 (the worst result, patient is not physically active). Maximum - 50 (the best result).

Improvement of ODI as compared to baseline

3, 6 and 12 months
VAS (back, leg)
Time Frame: Day of hospital discharge (10-15 day after surgery), 3, 6 and 12 months

Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) - patient-reported pain intensity (0 - no pain, 10 - unbearable pain).

Improvement of VAS back- and leg pain intensity as compared to baseline

Day of hospital discharge (10-15 day after surgery), 3, 6 and 12 months
Surgery duration
Time Frame: Day of surgery
Surgery duration, in minutes
Day of surgery
Blood loss
Time Frame: Day of surgery
Blood loss, in milliliter
Day of surgery
MRI capacity spine canal
Time Frame: Day of hospital discharge (10-15 day after surgery)
Changes of spine canal capacity of spine segment, in sq. cm., as compared to baseline
Day of hospital discharge (10-15 day after surgery)
Bone fusion
Time Frame: 12 months
Intervertebral bone fusion formation, in degree (I, II, III or IV degree according to Tan)
12 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Aleksandr V Krutko, PhD, MD, Novosibirsk Research Institute of Traumatology and Orthopaedics n.a. Ya.L. Tsivyan, Neurosurgery Department

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

November 15, 2018

Primary Completion (Actual)

February 15, 2019

Study Completion (Actual)

February 15, 2020

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 15, 2018

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 17, 2018

First Posted (Actual)

November 20, 2018

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

May 14, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 12, 2020

Last Verified

February 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Spinal Stenosis Lumbar Canal With Neurogenic Claudication (Diagnosis)

Clinical Trials on Decompression

3
Subscribe