Ultrasound-guided Adductor Canal Block for Total Knee Replacement

June 14, 2017 updated by: Antoun Nader, Northwestern University

Ultrasound-guided Adductor Canal Block for Total Knee Replacement: a Randomized, Double-blind Placebo Controlled Trial.

Total knee arthroplasty is associated with intense early postoperative pain. Fast track recovery programs including early therapy protocols and early hospital discharge are being implemented at various hospitals. The postoperative analgesic pain regimen should enhance functional recovery in addition to providing efficient analgesia with minimal side effects. Adductor canal blockade is commonly used to provide postoperative analgesia for total knee arthroplasty (TKA) surgery. The investigators hypothesize that an ultrasound guided adductor canal block will lower narcotic consumption and improved overall satisfaction compared to ultrasound guided sham block with normal saline (placebo) for patients undergoing minimally invasive TKA surgery.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

The investigators hypothesize that an ultrasound guided adductor canal block will lower narcotic consumption and improved overall satisfaction compared to ultrasound guided sham block with normal saline (placebo) for patients undergoing minimally invasive TKA surgery.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

40

Phase

  • Phase 4

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Illinois
      • Chicago, Illinois, United States, 60611
        • Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

40 years to 75 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Participants 40 to 75 years old who are presenting for minimally invasive total knee arthroplasty under spinal anesthesia

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patient refusal
  • American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status classification of 4 or higher
  • Pre-existing neuropathy in the femoral or sciatic distribution
  • Coagulopathy
  • Infection at the site
  • Chronic opioid use (greater than 3 months)
  • Pregnancy
  • Medical conditions limiting physical therapy participation
  • Any other contra-indication to regional anesthesia

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Triple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Active Group
Ultrasound-guided adductor canal blockade with 10 ml of 0.25% bupivacaine
10 ml of 0.25% bupivacaine
Other Names:
  • Sensorcaine
Placebo Comparator: Control Group
Ultrasound-guided sham block with 10 ml of preservative free normal saline
10 ml of preservative free normal saline
Other Names:
  • 0.9% sodium chloride

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Opioid Consumption (mg morEq)
Time Frame: 36 hours
Opioid consumption (morphine equivalents)
36 hours

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Visual Analog Scale Pain Score
Time Frame: Pain burden at 36hr
Visual Analog Scale pain score; 0 = no pain, 10 = excruciating pain) in the knee recorded every 6 hours up to 36hrs following surgery.
Pain burden at 36hr
Length of Hospitalization
Time Frame: 0 to 192 hours
The average time to discharge in hours. Participants were discharged home went physical therapy criteria were met.
0 to 192 hours

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Antoun Nader, MD, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

March 1, 2014

Primary Completion (Actual)

October 1, 2015

Study Completion (Actual)

December 1, 2015

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 25, 2014

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 27, 2014

First Posted (Estimate)

April 1, 2014

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

July 11, 2017

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 14, 2017

Last Verified

June 1, 2017

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Knee Injuries

Clinical Trials on Bupivacaine

3
Subscribe