Image Guided Treatment Optimization With Cetuximab for Patients With Metastatic Colorectal Cancer (IMPACT-CRC)

April 8, 2021 updated by: C. Menke- van der Houven van Oordt, Amsterdam UMC, location VUmc

In this study the investigators will evaluate the uptake of 89Zirconium labeled cetuximab in extra-hepatic colorectal metastases. The investigators hypothesize that uptake of 89Zr-cetuximab is required for response to cetuximab. If no uptake is present the investigators will escalate the dose cetuximab and repeat the 89Zr-cetuximab PET.

The investigators will evaluate the clinical benefit rate of cetuximab in the patients with and without uptake. The ultimate goal is to create a selection tool that can predict response of cetuximab.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Rationale: Currently, third line systemic treatment for patients with advanced, wild type K-RAS and as has recently been demonstrated with wild type N-RAS (thereafter referred to as wild type RAS) colorectal cancer (CRC) includes epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) inhibition with the anti-EGFR antibody cetuximab. This type of treatment has a modest but significant beneficial activity in this patient group with improved progression-free and overall survival. Although it is known that patients with advanced wild type RAS CRC will not respond to anti-EGFR treatment, it is not understood why patients with wild type RAS CRC do not all benefit from this type of therapy. Apart from other potential gene mutations involved in response to treatment, differences in the variability of pharmacokinetics may play a crucial role in the response to anti-EGFR treatment. In non-responders insufficient drug accumulation may occur in the tumor due to pharmacokinetic processes, such as cetuximab sequestration in the liver which expresses high levels of EGFR, or due to low levels of EGFR expression in tumor lesions. Our main hypothesis is that uptake of cetuximab in metastases is required for response and that achieving cetuximab uptake by increasing its dose will result in improved clinical benefit in patients with advanced CRC with wild type RAS.

Objectives:

PART I:

  1. to demonstrate 89Zr-cetuximab uptake in non-hepatic metastases at standard dose or at cohort wise increased cetuximab doses (dose escalation).
  2. to determine the association between 89Zr-cetuximab uptake in non-hepatic metastases and treatment response.

PART II To determine the response rate with an optimized dose of cetuximab as has been selected in part 1 in patients without 89Zr-cetuximab tumor uptake at standard dose of cetuximab (dose extension).

Study design: This is a multicentre non-randomized intervention study; phase I-II dose escalation/extension study.

Study population: Patients with histopathologically confirmed advanced CRC with wild type RAS, without local treatment options, aged ≥ 18 years, with a life expectancy of at least 12 weeks, who are candidates for anti-EGFR antibody monotherapy (3rd line palliative treatment).

Intervention: In the first part we will perform an exploratory PET study in patients with metastasized, RAS wild type CRC without local treatment options, who will be treated with cetuximab. We hypothesize that uptake of 89Zr-cetuximab in metastases is required for response to cetuximab. We will analyze targeting of 89Zr-cetuximab to metastases and the association between 89Zr-cetuximab tumor uptake and tumor response. Early response evaluation will be done with 18F-FDG PET. In a subgroup of 20 patients with metastasis within the field of view (18 cm) including the heart, tumor perfusion will be measured with 15O-water PET scans. In addition, we will investigate the hypothesis that increasing the cetuximab dose results in uptake in patients without uptake in metastases of 89Zr-cetuximab when cetuximab is given at the standard dose regimen. In the second part we will study whether dose adjustments based on 89Zr-cetuximab targeting results in an improved response and clinical benefit rate. In addition, EGFR expression and saturation with cetuximab is studied in tumor biopsies obtained during treatment. Molecular pathways activated by EGFR and kinase activities as well as phosphoproteomics will be studied in tumor biopsies and skin biopsies before and after start of treatment. In addition, the relation of microRNA (miRNA) and peptide profiles in relation to response to therapy will be studied.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

85

Phase

  • Phase 2
  • Phase 1

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Amsterdam, Netherlands, 1007 MB
        • VU Medical Centre
      • Groningen, Netherlands, 9700 RB
        • University Medical Centre Groningen
    • Gelderland
      • Nijmegen, Gelderland, Netherlands, 6500 HB
        • Radboud University Medical Centre Nijmegen

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

Subjects are eligible if they meet the following criteria:

  • Advanced colorectal adenocarcinoma
  • Subjects must have been treated according to standard care with palliative chemotherapy including a fluoropyrimidine (e.g. fluorouracil or capecitabine), irinotecan, and oxaliplatin or had contra-indications to treatment with these drugs.
  • No local treatment options
  • Life expectancy of at least 12 weeks.
  • Age => 18 years.
  • Histological or cytological documentation of cancer is required.
  • Tumor material must be tested wild type for the K-RAS (codon 12, 13, 61, 117, 146) and N-RAS (codon 12, 13, 61, 117, 146) genes.
  • Subjects have at least one measurable lesion ≥ 2 cm outside the liver. Lesions must be evaluable by CT or MRI according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST 1.1).
  • ECOG (Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group) Performance Status of 0, 1 or 2
  • Adequate liver and renal functions as assessed by the following laboratory requirements to be conducted within 7 days prior to start of treatment:

    • Total bilirubin ≤ 1.5 times the upper limit of normal
    • ALT (alanine aminotransferase) and AST (aspartate aminotransferase) ≤ 2.5 times upper limit of normal (≤ 5 times upper limit of normal for subjects with liver involvement of their cancer)
    • Serum creatinin ≤ 1.5 times upper limit of normal or a calculated creatinin clearance => 50 ml/min
  • Signed informed consent must be obtained prior to any study specific procedures.

Exclusion Criteria:

Subjects who meet the following criteria at the time of screening will be excluded:

  • Previous exposure to an anti-EGFR therapy
  • Significant skin condition interfering with treatment
  • Pregnant or breast-feeding subjects. Women of childbearing potential must have a negative pregnancy test performed within 7 days of the start of treatment. Both men and women enrolled in this trial must agree to use adequate barrier birth control measures (e.g., cervical cap, condom, and diaphragm) during the course of the trial. Oral birth control methods alone will not be considered adequate on this study, because of the potential pharmacokinetic interaction between study drug and oral contraceptives. Concomitant use of oral and barrier contraceptives is advised. Contraception is necessary for at least 6 months after receiving study drug.
  • Concurrent anticancer chemotherapy, immunotherapy or investigational drug therapy during the study or within 4 weeks of the start of study drug.
  • Radiotherapy to the target lesions during study or within 4 weeks of the start of study drug. Palliative radiotherapy will be allowed.
  • Major surgery within 28 days of start of study drug.
  • Substance abuse, medical, psychological or social conditions that may interfere with the subject's participation in the study or evaluation of the study results.
  • Any condition that is unstable or could jeopardize the safety of the subject and their compliance in the study.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
  • Allocation: NON_RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: PARALLEL
  • Masking: NONE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
OTHER: Standard dose cetuximab
Uptake of 89Zr-cetuximab: continue standard dose (500mg/m2 bsa) (standard care)
500mg/m2 bsa cetuximab (described in the first arm)
EXPERIMENTAL: Dose escalation cetuximab
No 89Zr-cetuximab uptake: dose escalation in a 3x3 cohort design (with maximal 50% dose increase each cohort; with a maximum of 2000 mg/m2 bsa every two weeks)
dose escalation of cetuximab (described in the second arm)

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Uptake (SUV) of 89Zr-cetuximab in extra-hepatic metastases on PET-scan
Time Frame: 6 days post injection
6 days post injection
Clinical Benefit Rate
Time Frame: From date of first cetuximab injection until the date of first documented progression (median time to progression 2.5 months)
Complete response, partial response and stable disease (according to RECIST 1.1) on CT-scan (every 2 months)
From date of first cetuximab injection until the date of first documented progression (median time to progression 2.5 months)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Early response evaluation with 18F-FDG PET
Time Frame: two weeks after start treatment
Compare baseline 18F-FDG PET and the on treatment 18F-FDG PET (after 2 weeks of treatment).
two weeks after start treatment
Tumor perfusion as early response evaluation (measured with 15O-H2O-PET)
Time Frame: two weeks after start treatment

Compare baseline 15O-H2O-PET and the on treatment 15O-H2O-PET (after 2 weeks of treatment).

The 15O-H2O-PET will be done in a subgroup of 20 patients, which have metastases within 18 cm field of view including the heart/ aorta.

two weeks after start treatment
Overall survival
Time Frame: From date first cetuximab injection until the date of death (median overall survival 10 months)
From date first cetuximab injection until the date of death (median overall survival 10 months)
Progression Free Survival
Time Frame: From date of first cetuximab injection until the date of first documented progression (median time to progression 2.5 months)

First year: CT-scan every 2 months (RECIST 1.1)

After 1 year: CT-scan every 3 months (RECIST 1.1)

From date of first cetuximab injection until the date of first documented progression (median time to progression 2.5 months)
Skin toxicity and hypomagnesemia as early response marker
Time Frame: From date of first cetuximab injection until the date of first documented progression (median time to progression 2.5 months)
Every two weeks, graded according to CTCAE v 4.0
From date of first cetuximab injection until the date of first documented progression (median time to progression 2.5 months)
Quality of life (QoL) and health related QoL
Time Frame: From date of first cetuximab injection until the date of first documented progression (median time to progression 2.5 months)

Graded using:

  1. EQ-5D-3L (quality of Life questionnaire); every 2 months
  2. FACT-EGFRI-18 (quality of Life questionnaire, specially for skin toxicity caused by anti-EGFR therapy); every 2 weeks untill week 8, hereafter every two months
From date of first cetuximab injection until the date of first documented progression (median time to progression 2.5 months)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

April 1, 2014

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

January 1, 2021

Study Completion (ACTUAL)

January 1, 2021

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 8, 2014

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 17, 2014

First Posted (ESTIMATE)

April 21, 2014

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

April 14, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 8, 2021

Last Verified

April 1, 2021

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Metastatic Colorectal Cancer

Clinical Trials on Standard dose cetuximab

Subscribe