XILO-FIST, the Effect of Allopurinol on the Brain Heart and Blood Pressure After Stroke (XILO-FIST)

November 11, 2021 updated by: NHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde

Xanthine Oxidase Inhibition for Improvement of Long-term Outcomes Following Ischaemic Stroke and Transient Ischaemic Attack

Recurrent stroke and cognitive decline are common after ischaemic stroke. Allopurinol, a drug usually used to treat gout, has been shown to reduce heart ischaemia, heart size, and arterial stiffness and to relax brain blood vessels and may reduce the blood pressure. All of these properties may be associated with a lower risk of second stroke and cognitive decline. We now aim to explore whether allopurinol will reduce further damage to the brain (called white matter hyper-intensities) after stroke and also whether it reduces heart size and blood pressure after stroke.

We will conduct a multi-centre randomised, double-blind placebo controlled study to investigate whether two years allopurinol 300 mg twice per day (BD) improves these 3 outcomes, which are inextricably linked to risk of recurrence and cognitive decline after ischaemic stroke.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

New strategies are needed to improve long-term outcomes after ischaemic stroke or transient ischaemic attack (TIA). Approximately 13% of participants suffered recurrent stroke in recent secondary preventative trials , 40% of patients with TIA experience recurrent cardiovascular (CV) events during long-term follow up and there is an additional substantial burden from incident post-stroke dementia (~ 10% after first stroke and higher still after recurrent events) , cognitive decline (over 30%) and decline in physical function. Improving these outcomes is a recognised priority area for stroke research (as identified by stroke survivors through the recent James Lind Alliance priority setting workshops ).

Such adverse outcomes are particularly common in those with brain white matter hyper-intensities (WMH) on brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) . WMH are seen in as many as 90% of patients with ischaemic stroke , , are at least moderately severe in 50%6 and such 'severe' WMH are associated with substantially higher stroke recurrence rates (43% in one study)6, death and increased cognitive and physical decline. The burden of WMH increases during longitudinal follow up and this is associated with increased incident stroke, dementia and cognitive decline5. In the longitudinal population based Rotterdam scan study, 39% of elderly participants had WMH progression (over a mean period of 3.4 years) , as did 50% in the recent PROFeSS MRI sub-study (over 2 years)7 and 74% (over 3 years) in the Leukoariosis and Disability study (LADIS) .Similarly, silent brain infarction (SBI) is also associated with recurrent stroke and 14% developed incident infarcts on brain MRI in the Rotterdam scan study9. Thus, treatments that reduce WMH progression and incident silent brain infarction could have potentially profound effects on a variety of outcomes after stroke including cognition, functional outcome and recurrent stroke.

The pathological basis for WMH development and progression is poorly understood. Post mortem studies show presence of varied pathologies including demyelination, infarction, arteriosclerosis and breakdown of the blood-brain barrier. Key risk factors for development and progression of WMH are age, arterial hypertension and previous stroke9 and associations with other cardiovascular risk factors and left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH) have been demonstrated . Blood pressure (BP) lowering reduces WMH progression, as demonstrated by the PROGRESS MRI sub-study . In the PROFeSS MRI sub-study WMH progression was unaffected by the angiotensin receptor blocker telmisartan7 but unlike PROGRESS, there was no significant difference in BP between groups. In addition, WMH are less clearly related to hypertension in older patients with established cardiovascular disease meaning that novel strategies which reduce WMH progression and SBI would be particularly promising in this group.

The association between WMH and LVH is of particular interest; it appears independent of arterial BP , and may be mediated by aortic stiffness . There are additional potential mechanisms for this association (e.g., LVH is the strongest predictor of left atrial appendage thrombi, stronger than any left atrial parameter) . Regression of LVH is associated with reduced risk of stroke. In a recent meta-analysis of 14 studies in 12,809 patients, LVH regression was independently associated with a 25% reduction in future strokes, whereas the composite endpoint of CV events/mortality was only 15% lower . Similar findings were seen in the LIFE echo sub-study which utilised measures of left ventricular mass (LVM) . LVH regression is thus a promising therapeutic target in devising new ways to prevent strokes, especially if the same treatment were found to reduce WMH.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

464

Phase

  • Phase 4

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Aberdeen, United Kingdom, AB25 2ZD
        • NHS Grampian
      • Airdrie, United Kingdom, ML6 0JS
        • NHS Lanarkshire
      • Dundee, United Kingdom, DD1 9SY
        • NHS Tayside
      • Enniskillen, United Kingdom, BT74 6DN
        • South West Acute Hospital
      • Glasgow, United Kingdom, G11 6NT
        • NHS Greater Glagsow and Clyde
      • Leeds, United Kingdom, LS1 3EX
        • Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust
      • London, United Kingdom, SE1 7EH
        • Guys and St Thomas NHS Foundation Trust
      • London, United Kingdom, EN5 3DJ
        • Barnet Hospital
      • London, United Kingdom, WC1B 5EH
        • UCL Stroke Research Centre
      • Luton, United Kingdom, LU4 0DZ
        • Luton and Dunstable University Hosptial
      • Newcastle, United Kingdom, NE2 4AB
        • Newcastle Upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Trust
      • Nottingham, United Kingdom, NG5 1PB
        • Nottingham University
      • Sunderland, United Kingdom, SR4 7TP
        • City Hospital Sunderland NHS Foundation Trust
    • County Derry
      • Londonderry, County Derry, United Kingdom, BT47 6SB
        • Altnagelvin Campus
    • Essex
      • Chelmsford, Essex, United Kingdom, CM1 7ET
        • Broomfield Hospital
      • Westcliff-on-Sea, Essex, United Kingdom, SS0 0RY
        • Southend University Hospital
    • Kent
      • Dartford, Kent, United Kingdom, DA2 8DA
        • Darent Valley Hospital
    • London
      • Whitechapel, London, United Kingdom, E1 1BB
        • The Royal London Hospital
    • Northumberland
      • Ashington, Northumberland, United Kingdom, NE63 9JJ
        • Northumbria NHS Trust
    • Somerset
      • Bath, Somerset, United Kingdom, BA1 3NG
        • Royal United Hospital
    • Staffordshire
      • Stoke-on-Trent, Staffordshire, United Kingdom, ST4 6QG
        • Royal Stoke University Hosptial

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

46 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Ischaemic Stroke/ Ischaemic lesion on brain imaging in relevant anatomical territory in patients with transient ischaemic attack.
  • Age greater than 50 years. -- Consent within one month of stroke.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Modified Rankin scale score of 5 (at end of the possible enrolment window of one month after stroke).
  • Diagnosis of dementia (defined as a documented diagnosis or a screening Informant Questionnaire for Cognitive Decline in the Elderly (IQCODE) score of 3.6 or more).
  • Cognitive impairment deemed sufficient to compromise capacity to consent or to comply with the protocol (in the opinion of the local investigator).
  • Dependent on daily help from others for basic or instrumental activities of daily living prior to stroke (defined as assistance needed with toileting, walking or dressing).
  • Significant co-morbidity or frailty likely to cause death within 24 months or likely to make adherence to study protocol difficult for participant (in the opinion of the local investigator).
  • Contra-indication to or indication for administration of allopurinol (as detailed in Summary of Product Characteristics on the XILO-FIST web portal and in trial master file).
  • Concurrent azathioprine, 6-mercaptopurine therapy, other cytotoxic therapies, cyclosporin, theophylline and didanosine.
  • Significant hepatic impairment (defined as serum bilirubin, Aspartate Aminotransferase (AST) or Alanine transaminase (ALT) greater than three times upper limit of normal (ULN)).
  • Estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate < 30 mls/min
  • Contraindication to MRI scanning.
  • Women who are pregnant or breastfeeding.
  • Women of childbearing potential who are unable or unwilling to use contraception.
  • Prisoners.
  • Active participation in another Clinical Trial of Investigational Medicinal Product (CTIMP) or device trial or participation within the past month.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Quadruple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Placebo Comparator: Placebo
Experimental: Allopurinol

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
White matter hyper-intensities (WMH) progression rate over 2 years, defined using the Rotterdam Progression Score
Time Frame: 2 years
2 years

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Mortality
Time Frame: 2 years
2 years
change in mean day-time systolic BP at 1 month
Time Frame: 1 month
1 month
change in mean day-time diastolic BP at 1 month
Time Frame: 1 month
1 month
Schmidt's Progression Score
Time Frame: 2 years
2 years
Fazekas score
Time Frame: 2 years
2 years
Scheltens scale score
Time Frame: 2 years
2 years
New brain infarction on MRI
Time Frame: 2 years
2 years
Rotterdam Progression Score with those who die / become too frail to undergo MRI being assigned the highest score
Time Frame: 2 years
2 years
Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) score
Time Frame: 2 years
2 years
Incident dementia
Time Frame: 2 years
2 years
change in mean day-time systolic BP at 2 years
Time Frame: 2 years
2 years
change in mean day-time diastolic BP at 2 years
Time Frame: 2 years
2 years
blood pressure variability
Time Frame: 2 years
2 years
Quality of life (EQ-5D, Stroke Specific Quality of Life Scale (SS-QOL))
Time Frame: 2 years
2 years
Recurrent stroke
Time Frame: 2 years
2 years
Recurrent myocardial infarction (MI), stroke or cardiac death
Time Frame: 2 years
2 years
Incident atrial fibrillation
Time Frame: 2 years
2 years
Clinic blood pressure
Time Frame: 2 years
2 years

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Cardiac sub-study: Change in measured Left ventricular mass (LVM) at 2 years
Time Frame: 2 years
2 years
Cardiac sub-study: change in ejection fraction
Time Frame: 2 years
2 years
Cardiac Sub-study: change in end diastolic volume
Time Frame: 2 years
2 years
Cardiac sub-study: change in end systolic volume
Time Frame: 2 years
2 years
Cardiac Sub-study: change in stroke volume
Time Frame: 2 years
2 years
Cardiac sub-study: change in left atrial diameter
Time Frame: 2 years
2 years

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Collaborators

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Jesse Dawson, University of Glasgow

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

May 1, 2014

Primary Completion (Actual)

February 1, 2021

Study Completion (Actual)

February 1, 2021

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 23, 2014

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 23, 2014

First Posted (Estimate)

April 24, 2014

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

November 12, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 11, 2021

Last Verified

November 1, 2021

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Ischaemic Stroke

Clinical Trials on Placebo

Subscribe