Azacitidine and Sonidegib or Decitabine in Treating Patients With Myeloid Malignancies

October 28, 2019 updated by: Mayo Clinic

Phase I/Ib Study of Azacitidine or Decitabine With Hedgehog Pathway Inhibition in Myeloid Malignancies

This phase I/Ib trial studies the side effects and best dose of azacitidine and sonidegib or decitabine and so see how well they work in treating patients with myeloid malignancies. The hedgehog (Hh) signaling pathway plays an important role in cellular growth, differentiation and repair. Inappropriate activation of Hh pathway signaling and uncontrolled cellular proliferation may be associated with mutations in the Hh-ligand cell surface receptor Smo. Sonidegib binds to the Hh cell surface receptor Smo, which may result in the suppression of the Hh signaling pathway and the inhibition of cancer cells. Azacitidine and decitabine may stop the growth of cancer cells by blocking some of the enzymes needed for cell growth. Giving azacitidine together with sonidegib or decitabine may be a safe and successful treatment for patients with myeloid malignancies.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

PRIMARY OBJECTIVES:

I. To estimate the maximally tolerated dose (MTD) of LDE225 (sonidegib) (days 1-28) in combination with azacitidine (overall); LDE225 (days 1-7) in combination with azacitidine (overall); and LDE225 (days 1-28) in combination with decitabine (overall). (Phase I) II. To estimate the efficacy of LDE225 (days 1-28) in combination with azacitidine in the following subgroups: untreated acute myeloid leukemia (AML)/chronic myelomonocytic leukemia (CMML)/myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS)/myeloproliferative neoplasm (MPN) overlap; relapsed/refractory AML/CMML/MDS/MPN overlap; and myelofibrosis (MF) only. (Phase Ib)

SECONDARY OBJECTIVES:

I. To estimate the duration of response, time to progression, overall survival, and time to AML or death (for MDS subjects) of LDE225 (days 1-28) in combination with azacitidine (overall and by cohort). (Phase I/1b)

TERTIARY OBJECTIVES:

I. To conduct correlative studies to measure HH pathway activation and inhibition and explore biomarkers of response.

II. To evaluate quality of life (QOL) and patient-reported symptoms using the Myeloproliferative Neoplasm Symptom Assessment Form (MPN-SAF) and European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life Questionnaire (QLQ)-Core (C)30 in subjects treated with LDE225 in combination with azacitidine or decitabine.

OUTLINE: This is a dose-escalation study of erismodegib.

Patients receive azacitidine subcutaneously (SC) or intravenously (IV) on days 1-7, sonidegib orally (PO) once daily (QD) on days 1-28 or 1-7* or decitabine IV on days 1-5. Courses repeat every 28 days in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity.

*NOTE: Sonidegib PO QD is given on days 1-7 if in combination with azacitidine or on days 1-28 is given if in combination with decitabine.

After completion of study treatment, patients are followed up every 3 months until progressive disease and then every 6 months for 2 years.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

63

Phase

  • Phase 1

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Minnesota
      • Rochester, Minnesota, United States, 55905
        • Mayo Clinic

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with one of the following diagnoses:

    • Intermediate, high and very high risk (per International Prognostic Scoring System [IPSS]-revised [R]) untreated MDS or any MDS with >= 5% marrow blasts (by French American British [FAB] and World Health Organization [WHO] diagnostic criteria); NOTE: MDS/MPN overlap is allowed
    • CMML requiring treatment per doctor of medicine (MD) judgment
    • Low and very low risk MDS patients symptomatic and/or transfusion dependent, (>= 4 U red blood cells [RBC] over the preceding 12 week period) who have failed erythropoietin-stimulating agents (ESAs) or who have a low likelihood of responding to ESAs
    • MDS and CMML patients relapsed/refractory to hypomethylating agents as evidenced by one of the following:

      • Progressed at any time during treatment with hypomethylating agents
      • Failed to achieve a response after 6 cycles of 5-azacytidine or 4 cycles of decitabine
      • Progressed after treatment with hypomethylating agents had been discontinued

        • NOTE: MDS/MPN overlap is allowed
    • Relapsed or refractory AML exposed to =< 3 prior regimens (note, induction and consolidation including stem cell transplantation count as one regimen)
    • For exploratory phase I LDE225 days 1-7 with azacitidine or LDE225 days 1-28 with decitabine cohorts only: untreated AML/CMML/MDS/MPN overlap or relapsed/refractory AML/CMML/MDS/MPN overlap WITHOUT prior exposure to a hypomethylating agent (HMA)
    • Elderly (age >= 60) untreated AML and not a candidate for induction therapy
    • Untreated AML < 60 year of age who are not candidates to undergo standard induction chemotherapy
    • Primary myelofibrosis (PMF) and post essential thrombocytopenia (ET)/polycythemia vera (PV) MF with a Dynamic International Prognostic Scoring System (DIPSS)-plus score of intermediate or high, or a > 10% blasts in the marrow and who are in need of therapy and who have failed previous treatment with a janus kinase 2 (JAK2) inhibitor and, if appropriate, have failed Interferon based treatment
  • Total bilirubin =< 1.5 mg/dL (except Gilbert's syndrome or known hemolysis or leukemic infiltration)
  • Aspartate aminotransferase (AST) (serum glutamic oxaloacetic transaminase [SGOT]) and alanine aminotransferase (ALT) (serum glutamate pyruvate transaminase [SGPT]) =< 2.5 x upper limit of normal (ULN) or < 5 x ULN if organ involvement
  • Alkaline phosphatase < 5 x ULN
  • Serum creatinine =< 1.5 x ULN or 24 hour creatinine (Cr) clearance > 50 ml/min
  • Plasma creatine phosphokinase (CK) < 1.5 x ULN
  • Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status (PS) 0, 1 or 2
  • Ability to provide informed written consent and be able to adhere to the study visit schedule and other protocol requirements
  • Willing to return to enrolling institution for follow-up (during the active monitoring phase of the study)
  • Willing to provide blood and bone marrow aspirate samples for correlative research purposes
  • Negative serum pregnancy test done =< 7 days prior to registration, for women of childbearing potential only
  • Men must be willing to use appropriate contraception throughout study and for 6 months after; women must be willing to use appropriate contraception throughout study and for 20 months after
  • Patients who have undergone stem cell transplantation (SCT), autologous or allogeneic, are eligible provided that they are > 84 days from stem cell infusion, have no active graft-versus-host disease (GVHD), are off immunosuppressive agents for > 14 days
  • In the opinion of the investigator, patient must be able to receive at least 2 cycles of treatment

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Uncontrolled intercurrent illness including, but not limited to, active uncontrolled infection, known positive for active infectious hepatitis, type A, B or C; (past infection allowed), or psychiatric illness/social situations that would limit compliance with study requirements; Note: ongoing infection controlled on antibiotics/antifungal/antiviral medications are allowed unless listed as contraindicated
  • Any of the following prior therapies:

    • Cytotoxic chemotherapy =< 14 days prior to registration
    • Immunotherapy =< 14 days prior to registration
    • Biologic therapy (i.e. antibody therapies) =< 14 days prior to registration
    • Radiation therapy =< 14 days prior to registration
    • Targeted therapies (i.e. kinase inhibitors, =< 7 days or 5 half-life's whichever is shorter)
    • Patients must be off other biologic therapies including hematopoietic growth factors >= 7 days prior to registration
    • For steroids or other non-cytotoxics given for blast count control, patient must be off for > 24 hours (hrs) before starting therapy; NOTE: hydroxyurea (HU) is allowed for blast count control throughout study
    • Receiving any other investigational agent which would be considered as a treatment for the primary neoplasm =< 14 days prior to registration
  • Active uncontrolled central nervous system (CNS) leukemia; NOTE: positive (cyto)pathology is allowed and patient can receive intrathecal chemotherapy
  • Immunocompromised patients and patients known to be human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) positive and currently receiving antiretroviral therapy; NOTE: patients known to be HIV positive, but without clinical evidence of an immunocompromised state, are eligible for this trial
  • Any previous treatment with LDE225 or allergic reactions to excipients of LDE225
  • Acute promyelocytic leukemia (APL, M3) unless failed regimens that included tretinoin, arsenic trioxide, anthracyclines and cytarabine and currently NOT candidates for stem cell transplantation
  • Major surgery =< 28 days prior to registration
  • Patients who have neuromuscular disorders (e.g. inflammatory myopathies, muscular dystrophy, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis and spinal muscular atrophy) or are on concomitant treatment with drugs that are recognized to cause rhabdomyolysis, such as 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl-CoA (HMG CoA) inhibitors (statins), clofibrate and gemfibrozil, and that cannot be discontinued at least 5 half lives prior to starting LDE225 treatment; NOTE: if it is essential that the patient stays on a statin to control hyperlipidemia, only pravastatin may be used with extra caution
  • Patients who are planning on embarking on a new strenuous exercise regimen after initiation of study treatment; NOTE: muscular activities, such as strenuous exercise, that can result in significant increases in plasma creatine kinase (CK) levels should be avoided whilst on LDE225 treatment
  • Patients who are receiving treatment with medications known to be moderate and strong inhibitors or inducers of cytochrome P450, family 3, subfamily A, polypeptide 4 (CYP3A4)/cytochrome P450, family 3, subfamily A, polypeptide 5 (5) or drugs metabolized by cytochrome P450, family 2, subfamily B, polypeptide 6 (CYP2B6) or cytochrome P450, family 2, subfamily C, polypeptide 9 (CYP2C9) that have narrow therapeutic index, and that cannot be discontinued before starting treatment with LDE225; medications that are strong CYP3A4/5 inhibitors should be discontinued at least 7 days and strong CYP3A4/5 inducers for at least 2 weeks prior to starting treatment with LDE225; NOTE: patients who are already on or require initiation of azoles other than fluconazole will be excluded from the phase I dose escalation portion of the study
  • Impaired cardiac function or clinically significant heart disease, including any one of the following:

    • Angina pectoris within 3 months
    • Acute myocardial infarction within 3 months
    • Corrected Fridericia's QT (QTcF) > 450 msec for males and > 470 msec for females on the screening electrocardiogram (ECG)
    • A past medical history of clinically significant ECG abnormalities or a family history of prolonged QT-interval syndrome
    • New York Heart Association classification IV cardiovascular disease or symptomatic class III disease
    • Other clinically significant heart disease (e.g. congestive heart failure, uncontrolled hypertension, history of labile hypertension, or history of poor compliance with an antihypertensive regimen)
  • Any of the following:

    • Pregnant women
    • Nursing women
    • Men or women of childbearing potential who are unwilling to employ adequate contraception during the study and through 20 months after the final dose of study treatment if female, and for 6 months after final dose of study treatment if male
    • NOTE: adequate contraception is defined as either:

      • Total abstinence: when this is in line with the preferred and usual lifestyle of the patient; periodic abstinence (e.g., calendar, ovulation, symptothermal, post-ovulation methods) and withdrawal are not acceptable methods of contraception
      • Sterilization: patient has had surgical bilateral oophorectomy (with or without hysterectomy) or tubal ligation at least six weeks before taking study treatment; in case of oophorectomy alone, only when the reproductive status of the woman has been confirmed by follow up hormone level assessment
      • Male partner sterilization (with the appropriate post-vasectomy documentation of the absence of sperm in the ejaculate); (for female study patients, the vasectomized male partner should be the sole partner for that patient)
      • Use a combination of the following:

        • Placement of a non-hormonal intrauterine device (IUD) or non-hormonal intrauterine system (IUS)
        • Barrier method of contraception: condom or occlusive cap (diaphragm or cervical vault caps) with spermicidal foam/gel/film/cream/vaginal suppository

          • Note: hormonal contraception methods (e.g. oral, injected, implanted) are not allowed as it cannot be ruled out that the study drug decreases the effectiveness of hormonal contraception
          • Note: women are considered post-menopausal and not child bearing potential if they have had 12 months of natural (spontaneous) amenorrhea with an appropriate clinical profile (e.g. age appropriate, history of vasomotor symptoms) or six months of spontaneous amenorrhea with serum follicle stimulating hormone (FSH) levels > 40 mIU/mL and estradiol < 20 pg/mL or have had surgical bilateral oophorectomy (with or without hysterectomy) at least six weeks ago; in the case of oophorectomy alone, only when the reproductive status of the woman has been confirmed by follow up hormone level assessment is she considered not of child bearing potential
          • Note: male patient must use highly effective (double barrier) methods of contraception (e.g., spermicidal gel plus condom) for the entire duration of the study, and continuing using contraception and refrain from fathering a child for 6 months following the study drug; a condom is required to be used also by vasectomized men as well as during intercourse with a male partner in order to prevent delivery of the study treatment via seminal fluid

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Treatment (azacitidine, sonidegib, decitabine)

Patients receive azacitidine SC or IV on days 1-7, sonidegib PO QD on days 1-28 or 1-7* or decitabine IV on days 1-5. Courses repeat every 28 days in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity.

NOTE: Sonidegib PO QD is given on days 1-7 if in combination with azacitidine or on days 1-28 is given if in combination with decitabine.

Correlative studies
Ancillary studies
Other Names:
  • Quality of Life Assessment
Given IV
Other Names:
  • 5-Aza-2'-deoxycytidine
  • Dacogen
  • Decitabine for Injection
  • Deoxyazacytidine
  • Dezocitidine
Given SC or IV
Other Names:
  • 5 AZC
  • 5-AC
  • 5-Azacytidine
  • 5-AZC
  • Azacytidine
  • Azacytidine, 5-
  • Ladakamycin
  • Mylosar
  • U-18496
  • Vidaza
Given PO
Other Names:
  • LDE225
  • LDE-225
  • ERISMODEGIB
  • Odomzo
  • Smoothened Antagonist LDE225

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Best overall response (complete response [CR] or complete response with incomplete recovery [CRi]) in untreated AML, CMML, MDS, or MDS/MPN Overlap patients (Phase IB [Dose Expansion])
Time Frame: Up to 30 days post-treatment
The proportion of CR/CRi responses will be estimated (by cohort) by the number of CR/CRi responses divided by the total number of evaluable patients. 95% exact binomial confidence intervals will be computed. The frequency and relative frequency of individual response categories will also be computed. Best overall response over all cycles of study treatment will also be described using frequency and relative frequency of individual response categories.
Up to 30 days post-treatment
Best overall response (CR or CRi) in myelofibrosis patients (Phase IB [Dose Expansion])
Time Frame: Up to 30 days post-treatment
The proportion of CR/CRi responses will be estimated (by cohort) by the number of CR/CRi responses divided by the total number of evaluable patients. 95% exact binomial confidence intervals will be computed. The frequency and relative frequency of individual response categories will also be computed. Best overall response over all cycles of study treatment will also be described using frequency and relative frequency of individual response categories.
Up to 30 days post-treatment
Best overall response (CR or CRi) in relapsed/refractory AML, CMML, MDS, or MDS/MPN Overlap patients (Phase IB [Dose Expansion])
Time Frame: Up to 30 days post-treatment
The proportion of CR/CRi responses will be estimated (by cohort) by the number of CR/CRi responses divided by the total number of evaluable patients. 95% exact binomial confidence intervals will be computed. The frequency and relative frequency of individual response categories will also be computed. Best overall response over all cycles of study treatment will also be described using frequency and relative frequency of individual response categories.
Up to 30 days post-treatment
MTD defined as the dose level below the lowest dose that induces dose-limiting toxicity in at least one-third of patients (at least 2 of a maximum of 6 new patients) (Phase I)
Time Frame: 42 days
Graded using the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI CTCAE) version 4.0.
42 days

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Duration of response
Time Frame: Date at which the patient's earliest best objective status is first noted to be a CR/CRi response to the earliest date progression is documented, assessed up to 30 days post-treatment
The distribution of duration of response will be estimated using the method of Kaplan-Meier.
Date at which the patient's earliest best objective status is first noted to be a CR/CRi response to the earliest date progression is documented, assessed up to 30 days post-treatment
Incidence of adverse events graded using the NCI CTCAE version 4.0 (Phase IB [dose expansion])
Time Frame: Up to 30 days post-treatment
The maximum grade for each type of adverse event will be recorded for each patient, and frequency tables will be reviewed to determine patterns (by cohort and overall). Additionally, the relationship of the adverse event(s) to the study treatment will be taken into consideration. The rate of grade 3 or higher non-hematologic adverse events, and the rate of grade 4 or higher adverse event (hematologic and non-hematologic) will be computed each with a 95% exact binomial confidence interval.
Up to 30 days post-treatment
Overall survival
Time Frame: Time from registration to death due to any cause, assessed up to 30 days post-treatment
The distribution of survival time will be estimated using the method of Kaplan-Meier.
Time from registration to death due to any cause, assessed up to 30 days post-treatment
Time to AML
Time Frame: Time from registration to leukemic transformation due to any cause, assessed up to 30 days post-treatment
The distribution of time to AML will be estimated using the method of Kaplan-Meier.
Time from registration to leukemic transformation due to any cause, assessed up to 30 days post-treatment
Time to death
Time Frame: Time from registration to death due to any cause, assessed up to 30 days post-treatment
The distribution of time to death will be estimated using the method of Kaplan-Meier.
Time from registration to death due to any cause, assessed up to 30 days post-treatment
Time to progression
Time Frame: Time from registration to the earliest date of documentation of disease progression, assessed up to 30 days post-treatment
The distribution of time to progression will be estimated using the method of Kaplan-Meier.
Time from registration to the earliest date of documentation of disease progression, assessed up to 30 days post-treatment

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Biomarker levels
Time Frame: Up to 30 days post-treatment
Statistical analysis of each biomarker will be primarily descriptive. Continuous biomarker levels will be explored in a graphical manner including mean plots and plots of change and percent change from baseline and other summary measures. Any potential relationships between the baseline level or change in the level of each biomarker and clinical outcome such as overall response, 6-month progression and survival, and adverse event incidence will be further analyzed using Wilcoxon rank sum tests or logistic regression methods, as appropriate.
Up to 30 days post-treatment
Patient-reported outcomes (quality of life and symptoms) as assessed by the EORTC QLQ-C30 and MPN-SAF Total Symptom Score (TSS)
Time Frame: Up to 30 days post-treatment
Scale score trajectories over time will be examined using stream plots and mean plots with standard deviation error bars overall. Changes from baseline at each cycle will be statistically tested using paired t-tests, and standardized response means (mean of the change from baseline scores at a given cycle, divided by the standard deviation of the change scores) will be interpreted (after applying Middel's adjustment) using Cohen's cut-offs.
Up to 30 days post-treatment

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Aref Al-Kali, Mayo Clinic

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

May 1, 2014

Primary Completion (Actual)

December 31, 2016

Study Completion (Actual)

October 25, 2019

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 30, 2014

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 30, 2014

First Posted (Estimate)

May 2, 2014

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

October 30, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 28, 2019

Last Verified

August 1, 2019

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Primary Myelofibrosis

Clinical Trials on Laboratory Biomarker Analysis

3
Subscribe