Hepatic Dysfunction, Vitamin D Status, and Glycemic Control in Diabetes (VDLS)

January 7, 2017 updated by: Benjamin U. Nwosu, University of Massachusetts, Worcester
This study is designed to study the effect of vitamin D intake on the severity of fatty liver and poor glucose control in patients with type 2 diabetes and fatty liver disease.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

The prevalence of significantly poor glycemic control marked by a hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) level of ≥ 9.5% in youth with type 2 diabetes (T2D) is 27% 1 and 24.2% in young adults2. Strategies to improve glycemic control in patients with T2D include lifestyle modification, optimization of therapeutic regimens, and correction of comorbid states that impair glycemic control. However, the role of comorbid states on glycemic control in T2D has not been adequately studied. For example, 70% of patients with T2D have nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD)3, a potentially serious form of chronic liver disease 4 in which the triad of the development of lipotoxicity-induced mitochondrial dysfunction, activation of inflammatory pathways, and cytokine generation lead to progressive liver damage5. NAFLD is the leading cause of elevated liver enzymes in the US6, and is diagnosed by either liver biopsy or the detection of a hepatic triglyceride content (HTGC) of >5.6% by proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy (1H MRS)2. Despite the high prevalence of NAFLD in T2D, its potential impact on glycemic control through the impairment of hepatic metabolic processes is unclear. This is important because a crucial step in vitamin D metabolism, the hydroxylation of vitamin D at the 25 position, occurs in the liver. The consequence of NAFLD on this critical step in vitamin D metabolism in patients with T2D, and the impact of the resultant 25-hydroxyvitamin D [25(OH)D] deficiency on glycemic control are not well understood. The rationale for this study is that a clear understanding of the role of vitamin D on the pathogenesis of NAFLD is crucial because vitamin D is a prohormone with potent anti-inflammatory properties that inhibit pro-inflammatory cytokines such as tumor necrosis factor- α (TNF-α), interleukin-6, and the activity of macrophages 2 while upregulating the production of anti-inflammatory cytokine, interleukin-10 2which could potentially reverse the effects of insulin resistance (IR) and oxidative stress, the two key components of the 'double hit model' of the pathogenesis of NAFLD. The 'first hit' involves IR-induced hepatocyte lipid accumulation which increases hepatic vulnerability to the components of the 'second hit': oxidative stress and proinflammatory cytokines, leading to mitochondrial dysfunction, inflammation and fibrosis.

The investigators7 previously showed that mild hepatic dysfunction in patients with T2D was associated with a high prevalence (47.5%) of vitamin D deficiency as defined by 25(OH)D level of < 20 ng/mL, as well as poor glycemic control. The investigators further reported a significant inverse relationship between HbA1c and 25(OH)D, and also between 25(OH)D and alanine transaminase. These data suggest that mild hepatic dysfunction could impair vitamin D metabolism and negatively impact glycemic control in patients with T2D. The investigators have also accumulated data 8 to show that 25(OH)D supplementation was associated with a significant reduction in HbA1c in T2D without a significant change in insulin or metformin dose. Histologically, a recent animal study reported significant hepatic steatosis in vitamin D-deficient mice compared to vitamin D-sufficient mice 2.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

12

Phase

  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Massachusetts
      • Worcester, Massachusetts, United States, 01609
        • University of Massachusetts Medical School

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

10 years to 50 years (Child, Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Children: 10 - 17 years
  2. Adults: 18 - 50 years
  3. Type 2 diabetes > 6 mo duration
  4. 25-hydroxyvitamin D [25(OH)D] level of <20 ng/mL
  5. Hepatic triglyceride content (HTGC) value of >5.6%
  6. HbA1c of > 8%;
  7. Ability to take medication by mouth.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Pregnant or lactating women
  2. Mental deficiency (IQ <70)
  3. Chronic liver disease
  4. Disorders of vitamin D metabolism, kidney, or parathyroid disease;
  5. Calcium and/or vitamin D supplementation
  6. Mauriac syndrome
  7. Malabsorption of fat soluble vitamins
  8. Drug toxicity and alcoholism

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Quadruple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Vitamin D supplementation
Ergocalciferol 50,000 IU per week for 6 weeks, then bi-weekly for 6 mo
Ergocalciferol 50000 IU capsules Microcrystalline cellulose
Other Names:
  • Placebo
  • Vitamin D
Placebo Comparator: Placebo
Placebo capsules, on capsule per week for 6 weeks, then bi-weekly for 6 mo.
Ergocalciferol 50000 IU capsules Microcrystalline cellulose
Other Names:
  • Placebo
  • Vitamin D

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in hepatic triglyceride content (HTGC)
Time Frame: 6 months
Change in hepatic triglyceride content (HTGC) as measured by proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy (1H MRS)
6 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Hemoglobin A1c
Time Frame: 6 months
Change in glycemic control as measured by HbA1c.
6 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Benjamin U Nwosu, MD, University of Massachusetts, Worcester

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

March 1, 2014

Primary Completion (Actual)

October 1, 2016

Study Completion (Actual)

October 1, 2016

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 5, 2014

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 5, 2014

First Posted (Estimate)

May 7, 2014

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

January 10, 2017

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 7, 2017

Last Verified

January 1, 2017

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Vitamin D Deficiency

Clinical Trials on Ergocalciferol, placebo

3
Subscribe