Vegan vs AHA Diet on Inflammation and Glucometabolic Profile in Patients With CAD

April 23, 2018 updated by: NYU Langone Health

Effects of a Whole-food Plant-based Vegan Diet on Markers of Inflammation and Glucometabolic Profile in Patients With Coronary Artery Disease

In this randomized study the investigators aim to determine the effects of a whole-food plant-based vegan diet on markers of inflammation and glucometabolic profile in patients with cardiovascular disease. The investigators hypothesize that a whole-food plant-based vegan diet will reduce markers of inflammation and improve glucometabolic profile compared with the American Heart Association (AHA)- recommended diet at 2 months follow-up in patients with coronary artery disease (CAD). The investigators are also evaluating endothelial function using the EndoPAT device and stool microbiome.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Intervention / Treatment

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

100

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • New York
      • New York, New York, United States, 10016
        • NYUMC Tisch Hospital, HCC 14

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

21 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Subjects on stable medical therapy for at least 7-10 days post-coronary angiography and found to have CAD (defined as >50% lesion in an artery with >2mm caliber) .

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Failure of the Treatment Self-Regulation Questionnaire
  • Use of steroids or non-steroidal anti-inflammatory medications other than aspirin
  • Use of probiotics or over the counter supplements other than standard vitamins
  • Have a history of myocardial infarction or active infection within the preceding 3 months
  • Have a history of an eating disorder or colon cleansing or are already on a whole-food plant-based vegan diet
  • Have a planned PCI during the study period
  • Are participating in a competing study
  • Have any condition or situation that, in the investigator's opinion, may confound the study results, or may interfere significantly with the patient's ability to adhere with study procedures

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: American Heart Association diet
Participants randomized into this arm will follow an American Heart Association diet plan for 8 weeks.
Whole foods plant based vegan diet vs the American Heart Association-recommended diet
Other Names:
  • Vegan vs AHA-recommended diet
Experimental: Whole-food plant-based vegan diet
Participants randomized into this arm will be asked to follow a whole-food plant-based vegan diet plan for 8 weeks.
Whole foods plant based vegan diet vs the American Heart Association-recommended diet
Other Names:
  • Vegan vs AHA-recommended diet

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
change in hsCRP from baseline
Time Frame: At 8 weeks follow-up
At 8 weeks follow-up

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
change in L-selectin from baseline
Time Frame: 4 week and 8 week follow-up
4 week and 8 week follow-up
change in body mass index from baseline
Time Frame: 4 week and 8 week follow-up
4 week and 8 week follow-up
change in Abdominal Circumference from baseline
Time Frame: 4 week and 8 week follow-up
4 week and 8 week follow-up
change in Blood Pressure from baseline
Time Frame: 4 week and 8 week follow-up
4 week and 8 week follow-up
change in CD11b from baseline
Time Frame: 4 week and 8 week follow-up
4 week and 8 week follow-up
change in Stool microbiome from baseline
Time Frame: 4 and 8 week follow-up
4 and 8 week follow-up
change in EndPAT score from baseline
Time Frame: 4 and 8 week follow-up
4 and 8 week follow-up
change in Serum amyloid A from baseline
Time Frame: 4 week and 8 week follow-up
soluble inflammatory marker
4 week and 8 week follow-up
change in TNF-α from baseline
Time Frame: 4 week and 8 week follow-up
4 week and 8 week follow-up
change in pentraxin-3 from baseline
Time Frame: 4 week and 8 week follow-up
4 week and 8 week follow-up
change in MMP-9 from baseline
Time Frame: 4 week and 8 week follow-up
4 week and 8 week follow-up
change in lipid panel from baseline
Time Frame: 4 week and 8 week follow-up
4 week and 8 week follow-up
change in apolipoprotein B from baseline
Time Frame: 4 week and 8 week follow-up
4 week and 8 week follow-up
change in fasting blood glucose from baseline
Time Frame: 4 week and 8 week follow-up
4 week and 8 week follow-up
change in blood insulin from baseline
Time Frame: 4 week and 8 week follow-up
4 week and 8 week follow-up
change in Hemoglobin a1c from baseline
Time Frame: 4 week and 8 week follow-up
4 week and 8 week follow-up
change in cell adhesion molecule from baseline
Time Frame: 4 week and 8 week follow-up
4 week and 8 week follow-up
change in monocyte subtype from baseline
Time Frame: 4 week and 8 week follow-up
4 week and 8 week follow-up
change in interleukin from baseline
Time Frame: 4 week and 8 week follow-up
4 week and 8 week follow-up
change in chemokine from baseline
Time Frame: 4 week and 8 week follow-up
4 week and 8 week follow-up

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Binita Shah, MD, MS, NYU SOM

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

March 11, 2014

Primary Completion (Actual)

March 29, 2017

Study Completion (Actual)

March 1, 2018

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 7, 2014

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 8, 2014

First Posted (Estimate)

May 12, 2014

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

April 24, 2018

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 23, 2018

Last Verified

April 1, 2018

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Coronary Artery Disease

Clinical Trials on Diet

Subscribe