- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT02148172
Optimizing Plyometric Training for Functional Recovery Post-ACL Reconstruction
While surgical anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) of the knee restores passive stability, studies are showing consistently poor long-term outcomes. Unusually high risks of early-onset osteoarthritis and re-injury, and low rate of return to sport following ACLR all seem to be related to a chronic tendency to land stiff-legged from a jump or hop, which itself may be due to fear of re-injury. Decreased knee bending for force absorption simultaneously decreases performance level and increases risk for injury and arthritic changes.
The purpose of the proposed study is to compare a current best-practice plyometric training program to one utilizing body weight support to increase repetition and improve performance in the initial phases. The investigators hypothesize that we will see larger improvements in absorptive capacity of the knee and better confidence in activity immediately following body weight support training, as well as improved retention of training effects after a two-month period.
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
Montana
-
Missoula, Montana, United States, 59812
- University of Montana, Movement Science Laboratory
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- speak and understand English
- age between 12-35 years
- unilateral anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction between 6-48 months prior
- activity level greater than or equal to level 5 on the Tegner Activity Scale
Exclusion Criteria:
- Weight in excess of 300 pounds (136 kg)
- contralateral/bilateral ACL reconstruction or an unreconstructed ACL injury
- history of a posterior cruciate ligament injury
- lower extremity of back injury or other condition (e.g. cerebral palsy) that has limited their normal activities of daily living within the last 6 months
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Double
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
---|---|
Active Comparator: Standard Plyometric Training
Participants will undergo treatment 2 times a week for 8 weeks with plyometric exercises deemed to be consistent with best practice delivered at a standard dosage of sets and repetitions.
|
Participants will undergo individualized practice exercises of jumping, hopping, and cutting tasks consistent with standard published exercises.
|
Experimental: Plyometric Training with BWS
Participants will undergo treatment 2 times a week for 8 weeks with plyometric exercises deemed to be consistent with best practice with a treatment volume of sets and repetitions that exceeds standard practice.
Higher number of practice trials will be completed with body weight support (BWS) to reduce load.
Participants will start at 30 percent of body weight and will be slowly weaned away over time.
|
Participants will undergo individualized practice exercises of jumping, hopping, and cutting tasks consistent with standard published exercises while their body weight is supported via adjustable harness.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Time Frame |
---|---|
Change in sagittal plane knee kinetics and kinematics
Time Frame: Baseline and after 8 weeks of training
|
Baseline and after 8 weeks of training
|
Change in psychological readiness for sports activities via survey scores
Time Frame: baseline and after 8 weeks of training
|
baseline and after 8 weeks of training
|
Change in motor patterning via electromyography of quadriceps and hamstring muscles
Time Frame: Baseline and after 8 weeks of training
|
Baseline and after 8 weeks of training
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Time Frame |
---|---|
Retention of Biomechanical Adaptions in Knee kinetics and kinematics
Time Frame: Change from end of 8 weeks of training to 2 month follow-up
|
Change from end of 8 weeks of training to 2 month follow-up
|
Retention of adaptations in Psychological Readiness for Sport via survey
Time Frame: Change from end of 8 weeks of training to 2 month follow-up
|
Change from end of 8 weeks of training to 2 month follow-up
|
Retention of adaptations in motor patterning via electromyography
Time Frame: Change from end of 8 weeks of training to 2 month follow-up
|
Change from end of 8 weeks of training to 2 month follow-up
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Ryan L Mizner, PT, PhD, University of Montana
Publications and helpful links
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start
Primary Completion (Actual)
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Estimate)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- UM IRB 282-13
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injury
-
Bezirkskrankenhaus SchwazNot yet recruitingAnterior Cruciate Ligament Rupture | Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction | Anterior Cruciate Ligament InjuryAustria
-
eMKa MED Medical CenterWroclaw Medical UniversityRecruitingAnterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries | Anterior Cruciate Ligament Rupture | Anterior Cruciate Ligament Tear | Knee Injuries | Knee Ligament InjuryPoland
-
University of WashingtonCompletedAnterior Cruciate Ligament Injury | ACL Injury | ACL - Anterior Cruciate Ligament RuptureUnited States
-
eMKa MED Medical CenterWroclaw Medical UniversityRecruitingAnterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries | Anterior Cruciate Ligament Rupture | Anterior Cruciate Ligament Tear | Knee Injuries | Knee Ligament InjuryPoland
-
University of California, San FranciscoArthritis FoundationCompletedAcute Injury of Anterior Cruciate LigamentUnited States
-
Miach OrthopaedicsActive, not recruitingAnterior Cruciate Ligament Tear | Anterior Cruciate Ligament InjuryUnited States
-
Rush University Medical CenterEnrolling by invitationAnterior Cruciate Ligament Rupture | Anterior Cruciate Ligament InjuryUnited States
-
Miach OrthopaedicsActive, not recruitingAnterior Cruciate Ligament Rupture | Anterior Cruciate Ligament InjuryUnited States
-
Lynn Snyder-MacklerCompletedAcute Injury of Anterior Cruciate LigamentUnited States
-
Universidad de GranadaCompletedAcute Injury of Anterior Cruciate LigamentSpain
Clinical Trials on Standard Plyometric Training
-
Cairo UniversityCompletedCerebral PalsySaudi Arabia
-
Istanbul UniversityCompletedProprioception | Plyometric Exercise | Upper Quarter y Balance Test | The Closed Kinetic Chain Upper Extremity Stability TestTurkey
-
The University of The West IndiesCompletedFitness TrainingJamaica
-
Riphah International UniversityRecruitingHigh-Intensity Interval Training | Plyometric Exercise | Martial ArtsPakistan
-
Universiti Putra MalaysiaRecruitingPhysical Illness | Skill, CopingChina
-
Zohra Institute of Health SciencesCompleted
-
Investigación en Hemofilia y FisioterapiaCompleted
-
Rodrigo Lizama PerezCompletedSedentary Behavior | Plyometric ExerciseChile
-
University of ThessalyCompleted
-
Riphah International UniversityRecruiting