- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT07489404
Plyometric Training on Sand vs Firm Ground in Young Adults (PST-SF)
Influence of Training Surface (Firm Ground vs Sand) on Neuromuscular Performance, Dynamic Postural Balance, and Muscle Soreness Following Plyometric Training in Young Active Males
Summary
The purpose of this interventional study is to determine whether the type of training surface used during plyometric training influences neuromuscular performance, dynamic postural balance, and muscle soreness in young active males. The main questions this study aims to answer are:
- Does plyometric training performed on sand improve dynamic postural balance more than training performed on a firm surface?
- Does plyometric training performed on sand reduce lower-limb muscle soreness compared with training performed on a firm surface?
Researchers will compare a firm-ground plyometric training group, a sand-surface plyometric training group, and a control group to evaluate the effects of training surfaces on physical performance and recovery.
Participants will:
- Perform plyometric training sessions three times per week for eight weeks (experimental groups).
- Complete performance tests, including vertical jumps, sprint tests, change-of-direction speed tests, and the Y-Balance Test, before and after the intervention.
- Report perceived lower-limb muscle soreness following training sessions.
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Detailed Description
This prospective randomised controlled study investigates the effects of plyometric training performed on two different training surfaces (firm ground vs sand) on neuromuscular performance, dynamic postural balance, and lower-limb muscle soreness in young active males. Participants are randomly assigned to one of three groups: a firm-ground plyometric training group, a sand-based plyometric training group, or a control group that continues regular activities without additional training.
The intervention lasts eight weeks, with three supervised training sessions per week for the experimental groups. The plyometric training program includes multidirectional exercises, such as forward bounding jumps, lateral hurdle jumps, and forward hurdle jumps, with progressive increases in training volume throughout the intervention.
Neuromuscular performance is evaluated using the standing long jump, squat jump, countermovement jump, sprint tests (10 m and 20 m), and a change-of-direction speed test (T-test). Dynamic postural balance is assessed using the Y-Balance Test for both dominant and non-dominant stance legs. Lower-limb muscle soreness is recorded after each training session using a 7-point Likert scale.
Pre- and post-intervention assessments are conducted to determine the effects of training surfaces on performance outcomes, balance adaptations, and perceived muscle soreness.
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
Manouba
-
Manouba, Manouba, Tunisia, 2010
- Higher Institute of Sport and Physical Education of Ksar Said, University of Manouba
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Male university students aged between 19 and 20 years
- Physically active and regularly participating in practical sport science activities
- Free from lower-limb injuries during the previous six months
- Provided written informed consent to participate in the study
Exclusion Criteria:
- Presence of any musculoskeletal injury affecting the lower limbs or lower back
- Any neurological or balance disorder that could affect test performance
- Participation in another structured strength or plyometric training program during the study period
- Failure to complete the training intervention or testing sessions
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Basic Science
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Sand-Surface Plyometric Training
Participants performed a multidirectional plyometric training program on dry sand three times per week for eight weeks.
|
Participants performed a multidirectional plyometric training program on dry sand three times a week for eight weeks.
The training sessions included forward bounding jumps, lateral hurdle jumps, and forward hurdle jumps with progressive increases in training volume throughout the intervention period.
Other Names:
|
|
Active Comparator: Firm-Ground Plyometric Training
Participants performed a multidirectional plyometric training program on a firm surface three times a week for eight weeks.
|
Participants performed a multidirectional plyometric training program on dry sand three times a week for eight weeks.
The training sessions included forward bounding jumps, lateral hurdle jumps, and forward hurdle jumps with progressive increases in training volume throughout the intervention period.
Other Names:
|
|
No Intervention: control group
Participants continued their usual activities and did not perform additional plyometric training during the eight-week study period.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Change in Squat Jump (SJ) height (cm)
Time Frame: Baseline and after the 8-week training intervention
|
Squat Jump height is measured in centimeters using the Optojump infrared optical measurement system.
The mean of three trials will be used for analysis.
|
Baseline and after the 8-week training intervention
|
|
Change in Countermovement Jump (CMJ) height (cm)
Time Frame: Time Frame: Baseline and after 8 weeks
|
The countermovement jump height was measured in centimetres using the Optojump infrared optical measurement system.
The mean of three trials will be used for analysis.
|
Time Frame: Baseline and after 8 weeks
|
|
Change in Standing Long Jump distance (cm)
Time Frame: Baseline and after 8 weeks
|
Standing long jump performance is measured as horizontal jump distance in centimetres.
The best of three trials will be used for analysis.
|
Baseline and after 8 weeks
|
|
Change in 10-meter sprint time (s)
Time Frame: Baseline and after 8 weeks
|
Sprint performance was measured as the time in seconds to complete the 10-meter split using photoelectric timing gates.
The best of three trials will be used for analysis.
|
Baseline and after 8 weeks
|
|
Change in 20-meter sprint time (s)
Time Frame: Baseline and after 8 weeks
|
Sprint performance was measured as the time in seconds to complete the 20-metre sprint using photoelectric timing gates.
The best of three trials will be used for analysis.
|
Baseline and after 8 weeks
|
|
Change in T-test time (s)
Time Frame: Baseline and after 8 weeks
|
Change-of-direction speed is measured as the time in seconds it takes to complete the T-test using electronic timing gates.
The best of three trials will be used for analysis.
|
Baseline and after 8 weeks
|
|
Change in Y-Balance Test anterior reach distance on the dominant leg (cm)
Time Frame: Baseline and after 8 weeks
|
Dynamic postural balance is assessed as a maximal anterior reach distance on the dominant leg, measured in centimeters.
The best of three trials will be used for analysis.
|
Baseline and after 8 weeks
|
|
Change in Y-Balance Test posteromedial reach distance on the dominant leg (cm)
Time Frame: Baseline and after 8 weeks
|
Dynamic postural balance is assessed as a maximal posteromedial reach distance on the dominant leg, measured in centimeters.
The best of three trials will be used for analysis.
|
Baseline and after 8 weeks
|
|
Change in Y-Balance Test posterolateral reach distance on the dominant leg (cm)
Time Frame: Baseline and after 8 weeks
|
Dynamic postural balance is assessed as a maximal posterolateral reach distance on the dominant leg, measured in centimeters.
The best of three trials will be used for analysis.
|
Baseline and after 8 weeks
|
|
Change in Y-Balance Test anterior reach distance on the non-dominant leg (cm)
Time Frame: Baseline and after 8 weeks
|
Dynamic postural balance assessed as maximal anterior reach distance on the non-dominant leg, measured in centimeters.
The best of three trials will be used for analysis.
|
Baseline and after 8 weeks
|
|
Change in Y-Balance Test posterolateral reach distance on the non-dominant leg (cm)
Time Frame: Baseline and after 8 weeks
|
Dynamic postural balance was assessed as maximal posterolateral reach distance on the non-dominant leg, measured in centimetres.
The best of three trials will be used for analysis.
|
Baseline and after 8 weeks
|
|
Change in Y-Balance Test posteromedial reach distance on the non-dominant leg (cm)
Time Frame: Baseline and after 8 weeks
|
Dynamic postural balance assessed as maximal posteromedial reach distance on the non-dominant leg, measured in centimeters.
The best of three trials will be used for analysis.
|
Baseline and after 8 weeks
|
|
Mean lower-limb muscle soreness score (7-point Likert scale)
Time Frame: After each training session over 8 weeks
|
Lower-limb muscle soreness was assessed using a 7-point Likert scale after each plyometric training session.
The mean score across all training sessions will be used for analysis.
|
After each training session over 8 weeks
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Investigators
- Study Director: Mohamed UM jlid, Assoc. Prof., University Manouba
- Principal Investigator: Salah Mohammed Abuzaid, University Manouba
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Primary Completion (Actual)
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
IPD Plan Description
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Lower Limb Injuries
-
ibrahim cardiac hospital and research instituteBangladesh Institute of Research and Rehabilitation in Diabetes, Endocrine...CompletedLower Limb InjuriesBangladesh
-
Dragan MijatovićCompletedDynamic Balance, Flexibility and Agility as Predictors of Lower-extremity Injury in Football PlayersLOWER-LIMB INJURYBosnia and Herzegovina
-
University of IowaFabtech SystemsRecruitingTraumatic Lower Limb InjuryUnited States
-
EpicentreBrown University; Medecins Sans Frontieres, NetherlandsWithdrawnFracture | Lower Limb Injuries
-
University of Nevada, Las VegasUnited States Department of Defense; National Institutes of Health (NIH); University... and other collaboratorsRecruitingLower Limb Amputation Below Knee (Injury) | Lower Limb Amputation Above Knee (Injury) | Amputation | Lower Limb Amputation Knee | Lower Limb Amputation at Ankle (Injury) | Lower Limb Amputation at Hip (Injury)United States
-
Cairo UniversityNot yet recruitingLower Limb Burn | Lower Limb FunctionEgypt
-
University of WashingtonUnited States Department of DefenseRecruitingLower Limb; Fusion, Congenital | Lower Limb Fracture | Ankle Foot InjuryUnited States
-
Otto Bock Healthcare Products GmbHCompletedLower Limb Amputation Below Knee (Injury) | Lower Limb Amputation Above Knee (Injury) | Lower Limb Amputation KneeUnited States
-
University of British ColumbiaCanadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR)RecruitingLower Limb Amputation Below Knee (Injury) | Lower Limb Amputation Above Knee (Injury) | Amputation | Behavior | Lower Limb Amputation KneeCanada
-
Hacettepe UniversityCompletedBurn Scar | Burns | Lower Limb Injury | Lower Limb WoundTurkey
Clinical Trials on Plyometric Training on Sand
-
Khon Kaen UniversityCompleted
-
Majmaah UniversityUnknownChronic StrokeSaudi Arabia
-
Majmaah UniversityCompletedEffect of Walking on Sand With Dietary Intervention in Overweight Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Patients.Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2 | Walking, Difficulty | Hemoglobin; Hb-SCSaudi Arabia
-
University of MontanaAmerican Physical Therapy Association; Foundation for Physical Therapy, Inc.CompletedAnterior Cruciate Ligament Injury | Knee InjuryUnited States
-
Riphah International UniversityRecruitingHockey | Plyometric Exercise | Endurance TrainingPakistan
-
Teesside UniversityUniversity of SunderlandCompletedFrontal Plane Projection Angle | Maximal Countermovement Jump | Repeated 10/5United Kingdom
-
Cairo UniversityCompletedCerebral PalsySaudi Arabia
-
Cairo UniversityCompletedAthletes | Rhabdomyolysis | Exercise-Induced Muscle DamageSaudi Arabia
-
mustafa gulsenOkan UniversityCompleted
-
Istanbul UniversityCompletedProprioception | Plyometric Exercise | Upper Quarter y Balance Test | The Closed Kinetic Chain Upper Extremity Stability TestTurkey