Safety, Tolerability, Pharmacokinetic, Including Food Interaction, and Pharmacodynamic Profile of BIA 5-1058.

November 26, 2015 updated by: Bial - Portela C S.A.

A Double-blind, Randomised, Placebo-controlled, Combined Single and Multiple Ascending Dose Study to Investigate the Safety, Tolerability, Pharmacokinetic, Including Food Interaction, and Pharmacodynamic Profile of BIA 5-1058, in Healthy Male Volunteers

The purpose of this study is to to assess the safety and tolerability of BIA 5 1058 after single and multiple oral doses

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

This was a Phase 1, double blind, randomised, placebo-controlled combined single ascending dose (SAD), including food interaction (food effect, FE) analysis, and multiple ascending dose (MAD) study.

SAD: This part consisted of an eligibility screening period, one study period involving administration of single doses of BIA 5-1058 or placebo according to a randomized design, and a follow-up period. Nine sequential groups of 8 healthy young male subjects were dosed. Within each group, 6 subjects were randomised to receive BIA 5-1058 and 2 subjects were randomised to receive placebo. In this first-in-human study, the subjects participating at the lowest dose level of 5 mg were dosed according to a sentinel dosing design to ensure optimal safety. Initially, 2 subjects were dosed; 1 subject with BIA 5-1058 and 1 subject with placebo. After the safety and tolerability results of the first 24 h following dosing for the initial subjects had been found to be acceptable to the MI, the other 6 subjects of the lowest dose level were dosed.

MAD: This part consisted of an eligibility screening period, one study period involving administration of multiple doses of BIA 5-1058 or placebo once daily for 10 days, and a follow-up period. Five sequential groups of 8 healthy young male subjects were dosed.

Within each group, 6 subjects were randomised to receive BIA 5-1058 and 2 subjects were randomised to receive placebo.

The starting dose of 50 mg was chosen taking into consideration the dose range of the previous SAD sequential groups and was approved by the IEC. Escalation to the next higher dose and the determination of the next dose level was based on safety, tolerability and available PK results of the previously administered dose

FE: This part consisted of an eligibility screening period, an open-label two-way crossover study period, and a follow-up period. One group of 12 subjects received single doses of 400 mg BIA 5-1058 during 2 treatment periods, once after having fasted overnight and once after consumption of a high fat breakfast. Each treatment was separated by a period of at least 7 days. The treatment sequence was determined by randomisation.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

124

Phase

  • Phase 1

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 55 years (Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

Male

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

Subjects were eligible for the study if they met all the following inclusion criteria:

  • Gender - male
  • Age - 18 - 55 years, inclusive
  • Body Mass Index (BMI) - 18.0 - 30.0 kg m2 (BMI (kg m2) = Body weight (kg) - Heigh t2 (m 2))
  • Ability and willingness to abstain from alcohol, methylxanthine-containing beverages or food (coffee, tea, cola, chocolate, power drinks), grapefruit (juice) and tobacco products from 48 h prior to entry in the clinical research centre until discharge
  • Medical history without major pathology
  • Normal resting supine blood pressure and pulse rate showing no clinically relevant deviations as judged by the MI
  • Computerised (12-lead) ECG recording without signs of clinically relevant pathology or showing no clinically relevant deviations as judged by the MI
  • All values for haematology and for clinical chemistry tests of blood and urine within the normal range or showing no clinically relevant deviations as judged by the MI
  • Willingness to sign the written ICF

Exclusion Criteria:

Subjects were excluded from participation if any of the following exclusion criteria applied

  • Any significant cardiovascular (e.g. hypertension), hepatic, renal, respiratory (e.g. childhood asthma), gastrointestinal, endocrine (e.g. diabetes, dyslipidemia), immunologic, haematological, neurologic, or psychiatric disease
  • An automatic ECG QTc interval reading at screening or enrolment of + 440 ms.
  • Evidence of clinically relevant pathology
  • Mental handicap
  • History of relevant drug and or food allergies
  • Smoking more than 10 cigarettes and or cigars and or pipes daily
  • History of alcohol abuse or drug addiction (including soft drugs like cannabis products)
  • Use of any prescription drug within 30 days before study drug administration with the exception of influenza vaccination
  • Use of any over-the-counter drugs including health supplements, herbal supplements such as St. John's Wort extract (except for the occasional use of acetaminophen (paracetamol), aspirin and vitamins - 100 recommended daily allowance) within 7 days before study drug administration. The use of paracetamol and or topical medication was allowed up to 3 days before entrance into the clinical research facility
  • Participation in a drug study within 90 days prior to drug administration
  • Participation in more than 3 other drug studies in the 10 months preceding the start of this study (this was the first administration of study drug)
  • Donation of more than 50 mL of blood within 90 days prior to first drug administration
  • Donation of more than 1.5 litres of blood in the 10 months preceding the start of this study (this was the first administration of study drug)
  • Positive screen on drugs of abuse (opiates, methadone, cocaine, amphetamines, cannabinoids), barbiturates, benzodiazepines, tricyclic antidepressants and alcohol
  • Intake of more than 24 units of alcohol per week (1 unit of alcohol equals approximately 250 mL of beer, 100 mL of wine or 35 mL of spirits)
  • Positive screen on hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg)
  • Positive screen on anti hepatitis C virus (HCV)
  • Positive screen on anti human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) 1 - 2
  • Acute disease state indicated as clinically relevant by the MI (e.g. nausea, vomiting, fever, diarrhoea) within 7 days before the first drug administration
  • Non-willingness to consume the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) breakfast (FE part only)

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: BIA 5-1058
BIA 5-1058 (5, 25 and 100 mg) tablets
oral administration
Other Names:
  • Zamicastat
Placebo Comparator: Placebo
tablets, visually matching active medication
oral administration

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Percentage (%) of Subjects With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Event (TEAE) Related to Study Medication (SM) - Single Ascending Dose (SAD) Period
Time Frame: Just before drug administration and twice daily until 72 h after (last) drug administration
Just before drug administration and twice daily until 72 h after (last) drug administration, subjects were asked non-leading questions to determine the occurrence of AEs. Subjects were asked in general terms about any AEs at regular intervals during each study period. In addition, all AEs reported spontaneously during the course of the study were recorded. All answers were assessed by the Medical Investigator (MI), coded using the Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities (MedDRA; Version 14.0) and recorded in the AEs Record. The intensity of the AEs was rated as "mild", "moderate" or "severe" and the relationship between the AEs and the study medication was indicated as "not related", "unlikely", "possible", "probable" or ''definite".
Just before drug administration and twice daily until 72 h after (last) drug administration
Percentage (%) of Subjects With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Event (TEAE) Related to Study Medication (SM) - Multiple Ascending Dose (MAD) Period
Time Frame: Just before drug administration and twice daily until 72 h after (last) drug administration
Just before drug administration and twice daily until 72 h after (last) drug administration, subjects were asked non-leading questions to determine the occurrence of AEs. Subjects were asked in general terms about any AEs at regular intervals during each study period. In addition, all AEs reported spontaneously during the course of the study were recorded. All answers were assessed by the Medical Investigator (MI), coded using the Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities (MedDRA; Version 14.0) and recorded in the AEs Record. The intensity of the AEs was rated as "mild", "moderate" or "severe" and the relationship between the AEs and the study medication was indicated as "not related", "unlikely", "possible", "probable" or ''definite".
Just before drug administration and twice daily until 72 h after (last) drug administration
Percentage (%) of Subjects With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Event (TEAE) Related to Study Medication (SM) - Food Effect (FE)
Time Frame: Just before drug administration and twice daily until 72 h after (last) drug administration
Just before drug administration and twice daily until 72 h after (last) drug administration, subjects were asked non-leading questions to determine the occurrence of AEs. Subjects were asked in general terms about any AEs at regular intervals during each study period. In addition, all AEs reported spontaneously during the course of the study were recorded. All answers were assessed by the Medical Investigator (MI), coded using the Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities (MedDRA; Version 14.0) and recorded in the AEs Record. The intensity of the AEs was rated as "mild", "moderate" or "severe" and the relationship between the AEs and the study medication was indicated as "not related", "unlikely", "possible", "probable" or ''definite".
Just before drug administration and twice daily until 72 h after (last) drug administration

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

March 1, 2011

Primary Completion (Actual)

January 1, 2012

Study Completion (Actual)

January 1, 2012

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 26, 2014

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 30, 2014

First Posted (Estimate)

June 2, 2014

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

January 5, 2016

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 26, 2015

Last Verified

November 1, 2015

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Hypertension and Chronic Heart Failure

Clinical Trials on Placebo

Subscribe