A Multicenter, Post Marketing Clinical Follow up (PMCF) Investigation to Evaluate the Performance and Safety of a Soft Silicone Foam Dressing and to Evaluate the Performance of Standard Care in Exuding Venous Leg Ulcers

September 6, 2016 updated by: Molnlycke Health Care AB
This investigation is a Post Marketing Follow-Up Study for Mepilex XT conducted as part of Mölnlycke Health Care's quality system. The primary objective is to evaluate the performance of the dressing when used as intended on exuding Venous Leg Ulcers (VLUs) in the inflammatory and granulating stages of the wound healing process.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

30

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Prague, Czech Republic
        • The General University Hospital in Prague
    • Konská 453
      • Třinec, Konská 453, Czech Republic, 739 61
        • Nemocnice Podlesí a.s.
    • Vrchlického
      • Jihlava, Vrchlického, Czech Republic, 586 01
        • Nemocnice Jihlava

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Venous Leg Ulcer
  2. Exuding wound
  3. Wound surface covered with sloughy tissue* (before debridement)
  4. Wound size ≥ 6 cm2
  5. In case of multiple wounds, target wound must be ≥ 3cm distant from other wounds.
  6. Wound suitable for treatment with the relevant primary dressing**
  7. Male or female, 18 years of age and above
  8. Signed Informed Consent

    • Sloughy tissue defined as wet, yellow-brown fibrinous tissue present in the wound bed ** Mepilex XT in the intervention group. Standard care in the observation group

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. More than two products of 15 cm x15 cm needed to cover the whole wound and affected peri-wound area
  2. Wound cavity and/or fistula
  3. Full thickness burns
  4. Exposed tendons and/or fascia
  5. Bleeding wounds
  6. Malignant or fungating wounds
  7. Wound age > 12 months
  8. Use of antimicrobial dressings or topical agents such as antiseptics, local antibiotics and steroids within 7 days from inclusion on the wound intended to be included
  9. Untreated limb ischemia (according to investigator's judgement) at the time of inclusion
  10. Subject not suitable for the investigation according to the investigator's judgement
  11. Subject included in other ongoing clinical investigation which could interfere with this investigation, as judged by the investigator
  12. Known allergy/hypersensitivity to any of the components of the primary dressing

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Non-Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Standard care
standard care ( such as alginate, hydrofiber or other treatment)
Experimental: Intervention ( Mepilex XT)
Experimental arm

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Changes From Baseline in Condition of the Peri Wound Skin
Time Frame: 16 weeks
Deteriorationin of skin condition , Mepilex XT and Standard care (%)
16 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Pain Scores on the Visual Analog Scale
Time Frame: 16 weeks
Pain at baseline visit, compared with pain at week 16. VAS scale, minimum pain = 0, maximum pain = 100.
16 weeks
Users Feedback After Handling or Use as a Measure of Performance.
Time Frame: 16 weeks

Investigator/Nurse and Subject evaluation of performance of the primary dressing ( n) Scale= Good , Very Good, Poor, Very Poor

1Ease of application, 2 Ease of removal, 3 Ability to retain exudate, 4 Adherence to healthy skin, 5 Confomability to be repositioned , 6 Overall satisfaction, 7 Dressing sticking to wound bed, 8 Presence of residues on the wound bed. 9 Presence of residues on the healthy skin. 10 Overall evaluation of change in periwound skin condition.

16 weeks
Measure of Actual Dressing Cost and Cost of Care, as Input for Health Economics Calculations.
Time Frame: 16 weeks
16 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

May 1, 2014

Primary Completion (Actual)

July 1, 2015

Study Completion (Actual)

July 1, 2015

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 15, 2014

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 18, 2014

First Posted (Estimate)

June 19, 2014

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

October 26, 2016

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 6, 2016

Last Verified

May 1, 2014

More Information

Terms related to this study

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Venous Leg Ulcer (VLU)

Clinical Trials on standard care

Subscribe