Takepron Intravenous 30 mg Specified Drug-use Survey [Acute Stress Ulcer and Acute Gastric Mucosal Lesions]

February 8, 2016 updated by: Takeda

Lansoprazole Intravenous 30 mg Specified Drug-use Survey [Acute Stress Ulcer and Acute Gastric Mucosal Lesions]

The purpose of this survey is to evaluate the safety (that is, frequency of adverse events) and efficacy (that is, hemostatic effect, rate of rebleeding after confirmation of hemostasis) of administration of lansoprazole intravenous 30 milligram (mg) (Takepron Intravenous 30 mg ) to a large number of participants with acute stress ulcer or acute gastric mucosal lesion in daily medical practice.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

This survey was designed to evaluate the safety (that is, frequency of adverse events) and efficacy (i.e., hemostatic effect, rate of rebleeding after confirmation of hemostasis) of administration of lansoprazole intravenous 30 mg (Takepron Intravenous 30 mg) to a large number of participants with acute stress ulcer or acute gastric mucosal lesion in daily medical practice.

For adults, 30 mg of lansoprazole is typically mixed in physiological saline (JP) or 5 percent (%) glucose solution for injection (JP) and administered twice daily by drip infusion or dissolved in 20 mL of physiological saline (JP) or 5% glucose solution for injection (JP) and administered twice daily by direct slow intravenous injection.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

63

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child
  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Acute stress ulcer and acute gastric mucosal lesions

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Inclusion Criteria:

Participants with the following diseases for whom oral administration is not feasible:

Acute stress ulcer, and acute gastric mucosal lesions (both of which should be accompanied by bleeding).

Exclusion Criteria:

-

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
30 mg of lansoprazole
30 mg of lansoprazole is mixed in physiological saline (JP) or 5% glucose solution for injection (JP) and administered twice daily by drip infusion or dissolved in 20 mL of physiological saline (JP) or 5% glucose solution for injection (JP) and administered twice daily by direct slow intravenous injection.
Drug: Lansoprazole
Lansoprazole 30 mg injection
Other Names:
  • Takepron 30 mg Injection

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number of Participants Reporting One or More Adverse Drug Reactions
Time Frame: Baseline up to Week 9
Adverse drug reactions are defined as adverse events (AEs) which are in the investigator's opinion of causal relationship to the study treatment. AEs are defined as any unfavorable and unintended signs, symptoms or diseases temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product reported from the first dose of study drug to the last dose of study drug.
Baseline up to Week 9

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Percentage of Participants With Observed Hemostatic Effect
Time Frame: Baseline up to Week 9
Hemostatic effect was categorized on the basis of degree of improvement as: markedly improved, moderately improved, slightly improved and poor in the participants with observed hemostatic effect. Efficacy rate was reported as percentage of participants showing efficacy and was calculated as the sum of percentage of number of participants reporting markedly improved + moderately improved + slightly improved divided by the percentage of total number of participants with observed hemostatic effect.
Baseline up to Week 9
Percentage of Participants With Confirmed Hemostatic Effect
Time Frame: Baseline up to Week 9
Hemostatic effect was categorized on the basis of degree of improvement as: markedly improved, moderately improved, slightly improved and poor in the participants with confirmed hemostatic effect by endoscopy. Efficacy rate was reported as percentage of participants showing efficacy and was calculated as the sum of percentage of number of participants reporting markedly improved + moderately improved + slightly improved divided by the percentage of total number of participants with confirmed hemostatic effect.
Baseline up to Week 9
Percentage of Participants With Confirmed Hemostatic Effect Who Experienced Rebleeding During Treatment
Time Frame: Baseline up to Week 9
Rebleeding rate was reported as percentage of participants who experienced rebleeding after confirmed hemostasis by endoscopy during treatment with lansoprazole. It was calculated by dividing the percentage of the number of participants who experienced rebleeding after hemostasis divided by the total number of participants with confirmed hemostasis.
Baseline up to Week 9
Percentage of Participants With Confirmed Hemostatic Effect Who Experienced Rebleeding After the Completion of Treatment
Time Frame: Week 17 (8 weeks after the last dose of study drug)
Rebleeding rate was reported as percentage of participants who experienced rebleeding after confirmed hemostasis by endoscopy and was calculated at 8 weeks after the completion of treatment with lansoprazole. It was calculated by dividing the percentage of the number of participants who experienced rebleeding after hemostasis divided by the total number of participants with confirmed hemostasis.
Week 17 (8 weeks after the last dose of study drug)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Takeda

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

January 1, 2007

Primary Completion (Actual)

March 1, 2010

Study Completion (Actual)

March 1, 2010

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 19, 2014

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 19, 2014

First Posted (Estimate)

June 23, 2014

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

March 8, 2016

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 8, 2016

Last Verified

February 1, 2016

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 254-012
  • JapicCTI-142542 (Registry Identifier: JapicCTI)
  • JapicCTI-R160830 (Registry Identifier: JapicCTI)

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Acute Stress Ulcer and Acute Gastric Mucosal Lesions

Clinical Trials on Lansoprazole

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

CROs by country

CROs in Zambia

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Subscribe