Patient-Defined Treatment Success and Preferences in Stage IV Lung Cancer Patients

December 3, 2015 updated by: KM Islam, PhD, University of Nebraska
Our long-term goal is to integrate non-small cell lung cancer patient treatment preferences into clinical treatment planning.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

The following specific aims are proposed:

Aim 1: Determine whether individual patients' preferences, characteristics, and treatment experiences affect the definition of treatment success.

Aim 2: Determine how to best predict real-life patients' treatment choices based on patients' preferences of adverse events.

Aim 3: Determine whether physicians are likely to change their oncologic clinical practice after receiving a detailed communication of their patients' preferences of adverse events.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Anticipated)

210

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Florida
      • Tampa, Florida, United States, 33612-9416
        • Recruiting
        • Moffitt Cancer Center
        • Contact:
    • Missouri
      • Kansas City, Missouri, United States, 64128
        • Recruiting
        • Kansas City VA Medical Center
        • Contact:
    • Nebraska
      • Grand Island, Nebraska, United States, 68803
        • Recruiting
        • Saint Francis Cancer Treatment Center
      • Lincoln, Nebraska, United States, 68510
      • North Platte, Nebraska, United States, 69101
        • Recruiting
        • Callahan Cancer Center of Great Plains Regional Medical Center
        • Contact:
      • Omaha, Nebraska, United States, 68198
        • Recruiting
        • University of Nebraska Medical Center
        • Contact:
      • Omaha, Nebraska, United States, 68105
        • Recruiting
        • Nebraska-Western Iowa (NWI) VA Health Care System
        • Contact:
    • South Dakota
      • Sioux Falls, South Dakota, United States, 57105
        • Recruiting
        • Avera Cancer Institute

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

19 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Newly diagnosed advanced stage non-small cell lung cancer patients with age > 19 years.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Willing and able to provide consent
  • Greater than or equal to 19 years of age
  • Diagnosed with stage IV non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC)
  • Able to understand spoken English
  • Eligible to undergo chemotherapy for stage IV NSCLC, to include, but not limited to, those who:

    1. have not yet started chemo
    2. are currently undergoing chemo for stage IV NSCLC
    3. have completed first line stage IV NSCLC chemo or progressed to maintenance for stage IV NSCLC within the last 30 days
    4. elect to have chemo elsewhere -- not at one of the study sites
    5. decline chemo

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Age <19 years
  • Not willing and/or able to provide consent
  • Not able to understand spoken English
  • Not eligible to undergo chemotherapy for stage IV NSCLC

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Patient-defined "treatment success"
Time Frame: Baseline
In advanced stage NSCLC patients does patient-defined "treatment success" differ when both survival and patient preferences of adverse events are accounted for, compared to when success is measured solely by survival? And does it also differ based on individual patient characteristics?
Baseline
Patients' will to experience adverse events
Time Frame: Baseline
Will the serious adverse events that an advanced stage NSCLC patient is willing to experience as part of his/her treatment differ after a real-life treatment experience, compared to before treatment?
Baseline

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Summary score derived from patient preferences of adverse events
Time Frame: Up to three months
In advanced stage NSCLC patients, is a summary score derived from patient preferences of adverse events comparable to a real-life treatment scenario?
Up to three months

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Physicians' will to select a treatment
Time Frame: Two years
Are physicians treating NSCLC patients more likely to select a treatment that matches patients' drug choices when provided standardized, detailed information on patients' preferences of adverse events compared to when they follow regular clinical practice?
Two years

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: KM Munirul Islam, MD, PhD, University of Nebraska

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

December 1, 2013

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

June 1, 2016

Study Completion (Anticipated)

June 1, 2016

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

July 2, 2014

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 11, 2014

First Posted (Estimate)

July 15, 2014

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

December 4, 2015

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 3, 2015

Last Verified

November 1, 2015

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 318-13-EP

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Gender

Subscribe