Aim to Reduce Movements in Tardive Dyskinesia (ARM-TD)

November 5, 2021 updated by: Auspex Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study of SD-809 (Deutetrabenazine) for the Treatment of Moderate to Severe Tardive Dyskinesia

The purpose of this study is to determine whether an investigational drug, SD-809 (deutetrabenazine), will reduce the severity of abnormal involuntary movements of tardive dyskinesia.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

117

Phase

  • Phase 2
  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Prague, Czechia
      • Gdansk, Poland
      • Katowice, Poland
      • Krakow, Poland
      • Lodz, Poland
      • Lublin, Poland
      • Torun, Poland
      • Hronovce, Slovakia
      • Roznava, Slovakia
    • Alabama
      • Tuscaloosa, Alabama, United States
    • California
      • Anaheim, California, United States
      • Glendale, California, United States
      • Oceanside, California, United States
      • Orange, California, United States
      • San Bernardino, California, United States
      • San Diego, California, United States
    • Colorado
      • Denver, Colorado, United States
    • Connecticut
      • New Haven, Connecticut, United States
      • Stamford, Connecticut, United States
    • District of Columbia
      • Washington, District of Columbia, United States
    • Florida
      • Boca Raton, Florida, United States
      • Gainesville, Florida, United States
      • Lake City, Florida, United States
      • Miami, Florida, United States
      • Orlando, Florida, United States
      • Port Charlotte, Florida, United States
    • Illinois
      • Chicago, Illinois, United States
    • Maryland
      • Baltimore, Maryland, United States
    • Minnesota
      • Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States
    • Missouri
      • Kansas City, Missouri, United States
      • Saint Louis, Missouri, United States
    • New Mexico
      • Albuquerque, New Mexico, United States
    • North Carolina
      • Asheville, North Carolina, United States
      • Durham, North Carolina, United States
      • Raleigh, North Carolina, United States
    • Ohio
      • Cleveland, Ohio, United States
    • Pennsylvania
      • Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States
    • South Carolina
      • Charleston, South Carolina, United States
    • Tennessee
      • Memphis, Tennessee, United States
    • Texas
      • Fort Worth, Texas, United States
    • Utah
      • Salt Lake City, Utah, United States

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 75 years (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • History of using a dopamine receptor antagonist for at least 3 months
  • Clinical diagnosis of tardive dyskinesia and has had symptoms for at least 3 months prior to screening
  • Subjects with underlying psychiatric diagnosis are stable and have no change in psychoactive medications
  • Have a mental health provider and does not anticipate any changes to treatment regimen in the next 3 months
  • History of being compliant with prescribed medications
  • Able to swallow study drug whole
  • Be in good general health and is expected to attend all study visits and complete study assessments
  • Female subjects must not be pregnant and agree to an acceptable method of contraception

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Currently receiving medication for the treatment of tardive dyskinesia
  • Have a neurological condition other than tardive dyskinesia that may interfere with assessing the severity of dyskinesias
  • Have a serious untreated or undertreated psychiatric illness
  • Have recent history or presence of violent behavior
  • Have unstable or serious medical illness
  • Have evidence of hepatic impairment
  • Have evidence of renal impairment
  • Have known allergy to any component of SD-809 or tetrabenazine
  • Has participated in an investigational drug or device trial and received study drug within 30 days
  • Have acknowledged use of illicit drugs
  • Have a history of alcohol or substance abuse in the previous 12 months

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
  • Allocation: RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: PARALLEL
  • Masking: TRIPLE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: SD-809
SD-809 tablets taken twice daily for 12 weeks.
SD-809 tablets taken twice daily for 12 weeks, includes a dose titration period and maintenance period.
Other Names:
  • deutetrabenazine
  • AUSTEDO®
Placebo Comparator: Sugar Pill
Placebo tablets taken twice daily for 12 weeks.
Placebo tablets taken twice daily for 12 weeks.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in Centrally Read Abnormal Involuntary Movement Scale (AIMS) Score From Baseline to Week 12 Using Mixed Model Repeated Measures (MMRM) Analysis
Time Frame: Day 0 (Baseline), Weeks 2, 4, 6, 9 and 12

AIMS is an assessment tool used to detect and follow the severity of TD over time. The AIMS is composed of 12 clinician-administered and scored items. AIMS was digitally video recorded using a standard protocol and independently reviewed by blinded central raters who were experts in movement disorders.

This outcome sums items 1 through 7 which cover orofacial movements, and extremity and truncal dyskinesia. Severity ratings were from 0 (none) to 4 (severe) for a total scale of 0 (no orofacial, truncal, and extremity dyskinesia) to 28 (severe orofacial, truncal, and extremity dyskinesia). A negative change from baseline score indicates improvement.

A MMRM analysis with change from baseline in AIMS score as dependent variable was used. The model included fixed effects for treatment, time point, treatment-by-time point interaction, DRA status, and baseline AIMS as a covariate. An unstructured covariance model was used.

Day 0 (Baseline), Weeks 2, 4, 6, 9 and 12

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Percentage of Patients Who Are a Treatment Success at Week 12 as Assessed by the Clinical Global Impression of Change (CGIC)
Time Frame: Week 12
The CGIC is a single-item questionnaire that asks the investigator to assess a patient's TD symptoms at specific visits after initiating therapy. The CGIC uses a 7 point Likert Scale, ranging from very much worse (-3) to very much improved (+3), to assess overall response to therapy. A treatment success was defined as "much improved" or "very much improved" at the week 12 visit. Patients whose status at week 12 was not known, as well as patients who were not "much improved" or "very much improved" at the week 12 visit, were considered treatment failures.
Week 12
Percentage of Patients Who Are a Treatment Success at Week 12 as Assessed by the Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC)
Time Frame: Week 12
The PGIC is a single-item questionnaire that asks the patient to assess their TD symptoms at specific visits after initiating therapy. The PGIC uses a 7 point Likert Scale, ranging from very much worse (-3) to very much improved (+3), to assess overall response to therapy. A treatment success was defined as "much improved" or "very much improved" at the week 12 visit. Patients whose status at week 12 was not known, as well as patients who were not "much improved" or "very much improved" at the week 12 visit, were considered treatment failures.
Week 12
Change From Baseline to Week 12 in the Modified Craniocervical Dystonia Questionnaire (CDQ-24)
Time Frame: Day 0 (Baseline), Week 12 with last observation carried forward
The CDQ-24 is a disease-specific quality of life questionnaire developed for use in patients with craniocervical dystonia, including both cervical dystonia (CD) and blepharospasm (BPS). The CDQ 24 was modified such that the questions focus more directly on the impact of TD (as opposed to CD/BPS) on quality of life. The following domains are evaluated in the CDQ-24: stigma, emotional well-being, pain, activities of daily living, and social/family life. Each of the 24 questions were rated by patients on a scale of 0=no impairment to 4=severest impairment for a total scale of 0 (no impairment) to 96 (severe impairment). Negative change from baseline scores indicate improvement.
Day 0 (Baseline), Week 12 with last observation carried forward
Participants With Adverse Events for the Overall Treatment Period
Time Frame: Day 1 to Week 12
An adverse event was defined as any untoward medical occurrence that develops or worsens in severity during the conduct of a clinical study and does not necessarily have a causal relationship to the study drug. Severity was rated by the investigator on a scale of mild, moderate and severe, with severe= an AE which prevents normal daily activities. Relation of AE to treatment was determined by the investigator and includes possibly, probably and definitely related categories. Serious AEs (SAE) include death, a life-threatening adverse event, inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, persistent or significant disability or incapacity, a congenital anomaly or birth defect, OR an important medical event that jeopardized the patient and required medical intervention to prevent the previously listed serious outcomes.
Day 1 to Week 12
Percentage Change in Centrally Read Abnormal Involuntary Movement Scale (AIMS) Score From Baseline to Week 12 Using MMRM Analysis
Time Frame: Day 0 (Baseline), Weeks 2, 4, 6, 9 and 12

AIMS is an assessment tool used to detect and follow the severity of TD over time. The AIMS is composed of 12 clinician-administered and scored items. AIMS was digitally video recorded using a standard protocol and independently reviewed by blinded central raters who were experts in movement disorders.

This outcome sums items 1 through 7 which cover orofacial movements, and extremity and truncal dyskinesia. Severity ratings were from 0 (none) to 4 (severe) for a total scale of 0 (no orofacial, truncal, and extremity dyskinesia) to 28 (severe orofacial, truncal, and extremity dyskinesia). A negative percent change from baseline score indicates improvement.

The MMRM model includes fixed effects for treatment, time point (weeks 2, 4, 6, 9, 12), treatment-by-time point interaction, DRA status, and baseline AIMS as a covariate. Patient is a random effect.

Day 0 (Baseline), Weeks 2, 4, 6, 9 and 12
Cumulative Percentage of Abnormal Involuntary Movement Scale (AIMS) Responders by Response Level (Percentage Improvement From Baseline) at Week 12
Time Frame: Day 0 (Baseline), Week 12

Response level represents the % improvement in AIMS from baseline. AIMS is an assessment tool used to detect and follow the severity of TD over time. The AIMS is composed of 12 clinician-administered and scored items. AIMS was digitally video recorded using a standard protocol and independently reviewed by blinded central raters who were experts in movement disorders.

This outcome sums items 1 through 7 which cover orofacial movements, and extremity and truncal dyskinesia. Severity ratings were from 0 (none) to 4 (severe) for a total scale of 0 (no orofacial, truncal, and extremity dyskinesia) to 28 (severe orofacial, truncal, and extremity dyskinesia).

Patients with a missing AIMS score were considered to be AIMS nonresponders.

Day 0 (Baseline), Week 12
Change in Locally Read Abnormal Involuntary Movement Scale (AIMS) Score From Baseline to Week 12 Using MMRM Analysis
Time Frame: Day 0 (Baseline), Weeks 2, 4, 6, 9 and 12

This outcome is similar to the primary outcome except that AIMS was read locally.

AIMS is an assessment tool used to detect and follow the severity of TD over time. The AIMS is composed of 12 clinician-administered and scored items. This outcome reports the local reading of AIMS data.

This outcome sums items 1 through 7 which cover orofacial movements, and extremity and truncal dyskinesia. Severity ratings were from 0 (none) to 4 (severe) for a total scale of 0 (no orofacial, truncal, and extremity dyskinesia) to 28 (severe orofacial, truncal, and extremity dyskinesia). A negative change from baseline score indicates improvement.

A MMRM analysis with change from baseline in AIMS score as dependent variable was used. The model included fixed effects for treatment, time point (weeks 2, 4, 6, 9, and 12), treatment-by-time point interaction, DRA status, and baseline AIMS as a covariate.

Day 0 (Baseline), Weeks 2, 4, 6, 9 and 12

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

June 1, 2014

Primary Completion (Actual)

May 1, 2015

Study Completion (Actual)

May 1, 2015

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

July 18, 2014

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 18, 2014

First Posted (Estimate)

July 21, 2014

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

November 9, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 5, 2021

Last Verified

November 1, 2021

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Tardive Dyskinesia

Clinical Trials on SD-809

3
Subscribe