- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT02219308
Pain Control for Intrauterine Device Placement Using Paracervical Block
Pain Control for Intrauterine Device Placement: A Randomized Controlled Trial of Paracervical Block
Study Overview
Status
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Modern IUDs are highly effective long acting reversible forms of contraception. The Mirena IUD is 99.8% effective and the Paragard copper IUD is 99.2% effective in preventing pregnancy. Fear of IUD placement can be a barrier to obtaining this highly effective form of birth control. The current standard of care for pain management during and after IUD placement is no medication, as randomized control trials published to date have limited data regarding use of medications to decrease pain. There has been one trial to suggest that the use of naproxen with 1% lidocaine paracervical block (PCB) compared to PCB alone may decrease pain after IUD placement in primarily nulliparous patients. However, this study was with the much wider and no longer available Dalkon Shield IUD. In addition, this study did not show any significant decrease in pain scores during IUD placement. Studies to evaluate effectiveness of ibuprofen and misoprostol have shown no significant decrease in pain scores during and after IUD insertion, although the majority of participants in these studies were multiparous. There is some suggestion that 2% lidocaine gel one minute prior to IUD insertion may have some decrease in pain, although this study was poorly designed.
Although there is no standard of care in regards to pain medication administration prior to IUD placement, providers often suggest paracervical prior IUD insertion among nulliparous women. Therefore the primary aim of this study is to determine whether a paracervical block (PCB) decreases pain associated with intrauterine device (IUD) placement compared to no paracervical block. We hypothesize that administration of a PCB of 20 mL 1% buffered lidocaine prior to IUD placement will decrease pain scores by at least 20mm on a visual analog scale at various time points during IUD placement when compared to no paracervical block.
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
California
-
San Diego, California, United States, 92103
- UCSD
-
San Diego, California, United States, 92109
- Planned Parenthood Mission Bay Parker Center
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Nulliparous women
- English or Spanish speaking
- Present for intrauterine device placement for contraception or menorrhagia (in the case of Mirena IUD insertion).
Exclusion Criteria:
- Pregnancy
- Any diagnosed chronic pain issues (i.e. fibromyalgia, endometriosis, dysmenorrhea, irritable bowel syndrome, interstitial cystitis)
- If the patient has taken any pain medications within 6 hours of enrollment, including aspirin or other NSAIDs
- Misoprostol administration within 24 hours of enrollment
- History of prior IUD insertion
- Known contraindications to IUD
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Single
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Paracervical Block (PCB)
Subject receives 2 mL 1% buffered Lidocaine anesthetic at anterior lip of cervix, where tenaculum will be placed. Subject then receives paracervical block of 18 mL 1% buffered Lidocaine. Provider then places IUD. |
Drug: 1% Lidocaine Hydrochloride Injection of 2 mL 1% buffered lidocaine solution at anterior lip of cervix and 18 mL 1% buffered lidocaine solution evenly distributed between 4 o'clock and 8 o'clock positions of cervix with standard 22 gauge spinal needle. IUD placement then proceeds |
|
Sham Comparator: No Paracervical Block (Sham PCB)
Subject receives 2 mL 1% buffered Lidocaine anesthetic at anterior lip of cervix, where tenaculum will be placed. Subject then receives Sham paracervical block with capped needle. Provider then places IUD. |
Drug: 1% Lidocaine Hydrochloride Injection of 2 mL 1% buffered lidocaine solution at anterior lip of cervix with standard 22 gauge spinal needle. Capped spinal needle is then held against the cervix at 4 o'clock and 8 o'clock positions of cervix, lightly so as not to cause blanching, indentation, or pain. IUD placement then proceeds |
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Pain With Intrauterine Device (IUD) Placement
Time Frame: Moment of IUD insertion
|
Distance (mm) from the left of the 100-mm visual analog scale (reflecting magnitude of pain) recorded at time of IUD Placement.
Scale range is from 0mm (no pain) to 100mm (worst pain possible).
A lower score (less pain) is considered a better outcome.
|
Moment of IUD insertion
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Median Pain Scores for All Time Points
Time Frame: Anticipation of procedure through 5 minutes after IUD placement
|
Distance (mm) from the left of the 100-mm visual analog scale of pain at various time points.
Scale range is 0mm (no pain) to 100mm (worst pain possible).
Lower scores are considered better outcomes.
|
Anticipation of procedure through 5 minutes after IUD placement
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Sheila Mody, MD MPH, UCSD
Publications and helpful links
General Publications
- Allen RH, Bartz D, Grimes DA, Hubacher D, O'Brien P. Interventions for pain with intrauterine device insertion. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2009 Jul 8;(3):CD007373. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007373.pub2.
- Cetin A, Cetin M. Effect of deep injections of local anesthetics and basal dilatation of cervix in management of pain during legal abortions. A randomized, controlled study. Contraception. 1997 Aug;56(2):85-7. doi: 10.1016/s0010-7824(97)00096-6.
- Edelman AB, Schaefer E, Olson A, Van Houten L, Bednarek P, Leclair C, Jensen JT. Effects of prophylactic misoprostol administration prior to intrauterine device insertion in nulliparous women. Contraception. 2011 Sep;84(3):234-9. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2011.01.016. Epub 2011 Mar 3.
- Hubacher D, Reyes V, Lillo S, Zepeda A, Chen PL, Croxatto H. Pain from copper intrauterine device insertion: randomized trial of prophylactic ibuprofen. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2006 Nov;195(5):1272-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2006.08.022.
- Maguire K, Davis A, Rosario Tejeda L, Westhoff C. Intracervical lidocaine gel for intrauterine device insertion: a randomized controlled trial. Contraception. 2012 Sep;86(3):214-9. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2012.01.005. Epub 2012 Feb 9.
- Massey SE, Varady JC, Henzl MR. Pain relief with naproxen following insertion of an intrauterine device. J Reprod Med. 1974 Dec;13(6):226-31. No abstract available.
- Mosher WD, Jones J. Use of contraception in the United States: 1982-2008. Vital Health Stat 23. 2010 Aug;(29):1-44.
- O'Connell K, Jones HE, Simon M, Saporta V, Paul M, Lichtenberg ES; National Abortion Federation Members. First-trimester surgical abortion practices: a survey of National Abortion Federation members. Contraception. 2009 May;79(5):385-92. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2008.11.005. Epub 2008 Dec 11.
- Phair N, Jensen JT, Nichols MD. Paracervical block and elective abortion: the effect on pain of waiting between injection and procedure. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2002 Jun;186(6):1304-7. doi: 10.1067/mob.2002.123734.
- Rabin JM, Spitzer M, Dwyer AT, Kaiser IH. Topical anesthesia for gynecologic procedures. Obstet Gynecol. 1989 Jun;73(6):1040-4. doi: 10.1097/00006250-198906000-00027.
- Renner RM, Jensen JT, Nichols MD, Edelman A. Pain control in first trimester surgical abortion. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2009 Apr 15;2009(2):CD006712. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006712.pub2.
- Roche NE, Li D, James D, Fechner A, Tilak V. The effect of perioperative ketorolac on pain control in pregnancy termination. Contraception. 2012 Mar;85(3):299-303. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2011.10.001. Epub 2011 Nov 30.
- Wiebe ER, Rawling M. Pain control in abortion. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 1995 Jul;50(1):41-6. doi: 10.1016/0020-7292(95)02416-a.
- Wiebe ER. Comparison of the efficacy of different local anesthetics and techniques of local anesthesia in therapeutic abortions. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1992 Jul;167(1):131-4. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9378(11)91645-7.
- Zieman, Mimi et al. A Pocket Guide to Managing Contraception. The Bridging Gap Foundation. © 2010
- Zullo F, Pellicano M, Stigliano CM, Di Carlo C, Fabrizio A, Nappi C. Topical anesthesia for office hysteroscopy. A prospective, randomized study comparing two modalities. J Reprod Med. 1999 Oct;44(10):865-9.
- Mody SK, Farala JP, Jimenez B, Nishikawa M, Ngo LL. Paracervical Block for Intrauterine Device Placement Among Nulliparous Women: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Obstet Gynecol. 2018 Sep;132(3):575-582. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000002790.
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Primary Completion (Actual)
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Estimate)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Other Study ID Numbers
- 141025
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Pain Due to Intrauterine Contraceptive Device
-
University of Campinas, BrazilCompletedContraceptive Usage | Bleeding Due to Intrauterine Contraceptive DeviceBrazil
-
noha mohamed elzaydyUnknown
-
University Hospital, RouenCompletedIntrauterine Contraceptive Device ComplicationFrance
-
Beni-Suef UniversityNot yet recruitingIntrauterine Contraceptive Device ComplicationEgypt
-
Cairo UniversityCompletedIntrauterine Contraceptive Device ComplicationEgypt
-
University of Kansas Medical CenterCompletedFemale Contraception | Women's Health | Reproductive Health | Intrauterine Device Complications | Contraceptive Device Failure | IUD Fragmentation | Retained Intrauterine DeviceUnited States
-
University of North Carolina, Chapel HillSociety of Family PlanningCompletedContraception | Malposition of Intrauterine Contraceptive DeviceUnited States
-
Dalarna UniversityRecruitingContraception | Contraceptive Implant | Counseling | Intrauterine Device | Long-acting Reversible ContraceptionSweden
-
Northwestern UniversityCompletedPain Control for Intrauterine Device InsertionsUnited States
-
Monakshi SawhneyQueen's University, Kingston, OntarioNot yet recruiting
Clinical Trials on Paracervical Block (PCB)
-
Oregon Health and Science UniversityPlanned Parenthood Federation of AmericaCompletedPain | Legal Abortion With ComplicationUnited States
-
University of HawaiiCompleted
-
Henan Cancer HospitalNot yet recruiting
-
The Fourth Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University...Active, not recruiting
-
Ciusss de L'Est de l'Île de MontréalWithdrawnShoulder Surgery | Regional Anesthesia MorbidityCanada
-
Acotec Scientific Co., LtdRecruitingChronic Limb-Threatening IschemiaUnited States, Austria, Belgium
-
Udayana UniversityCompletedLower Extremity SurgeryIndonesia
-
University Hospital, BonnRecruitingSymptomatic EpilepsyGermany
-
University of RochesterWithdrawnProstate DiseaseUnited States