- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT01094366
Paracervical Block for Pain Control in First Trimester Abortion
An Evaluation of the Paracervical Block for Pain Control in First Trimester Surgical Abortion
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
The investigators expect to have 120 women complete this study, between study sites at OHSU's Center for Women's Health and Planned Parenthood Columbia Willamette in Portland, OR. Every participant will still receive the standard oral medication for pain (ibuprofen) and anxiety (lorazepam). Eligible subjects will be at least 18 years of age, less than 11 weeks pregnant and have already decided to have a surgical abortion.
The primary outcome evaluated will be pain reported at time of cervical dilation. The investigators will assess pain at various time points (including secondary outcomes) immediately upon completion of the respective step and pain and satisfaction 30 minutes postoperatively.
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Phase
- Phase 4
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
Oregon
-
Portland, Oregon, United States, 97212
- Planned Parenthood Columbia Willamette
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Age: 18 years or older
- Voluntarily requesting pregnancy termination
- Ultrasound confirmed intrauterine pregnancy up to 10 6/7 weeks gestational age
- Good general health
- English or Spanish speaking
- Be able and willing to sign an informed consent and agree to terms of the study
Exclusion Criteria:
- Gestational ages over 11 0/7 weeks, due to routine misoprostol use at our institutions
- Incomplete abortion
- Required or requested narcotics or IV sedation (prior to randomization)
- Patients who refuse Ibuprofen and paracervical blocks
- Contraindications or allergies to lidocaine, ibuprofen or ativan
- Significant physical or mental health condition
- Adnexal mass or tenderness on pelvic exam consistent with pelvic inflammatory disease
- Patients with known hepatic disease
- Women, who in the opinion of the investigator are not suitable for the study protocol
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: DIAGNOSTIC
- Allocation: RANDOMIZED
- Interventional Model: PARALLEL
- Masking: SINGLE
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
---|---|
SHAM_COMPARATOR: No Paracervical Block for Pain Control
Subject will not receive a paracervical block during the procedure
|
In the non-intervention group, the surgeon performs a sham PCB during which 2 mL buffered lidocaine solution are injected at the tenaculum site, after which a capped needle gently simulates the standard PCB procedure.
|
ACTIVE_COMPARATOR: Paracervical Block for Pain Control
Subject will receive a paracervical block during the procedure.
|
Subject receives 20 mL paracervical block with 18 mL of 1% Lidocaine solution buffered with 2 mL 8.4% sodium bicarbonate for pain control.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Pain reported with cervical dilation
Time Frame: 1 Year
|
Distance (mm) from the left of the 100-mm VAS scale (reflecting magnitude of pain) recorded at time of cervical dilation.
|
1 Year
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Anticipated and reported pain at various time points
Time Frame: 1 Year
|
Distance (mm) from the left of the 100-mm VAS scale (reflecting magnitude of anticipated pain) recorded prior to the procedure. Distance (mm) from the left of the 100-mm VAS scale (reflecting magnitude of pain) recorded at time of positioning for procedure, speculum insertion, placement of the PCB, aspiration and 30 min postoperatively. |
1 Year
|
Anxiety reported with the pain expected during the procedure and the procedure itself.
Time Frame: 1 Year
|
Distance (mm) from the left of the 100-mm VAS scale (reflecting degree of anxiety) recorded prior to procedure.
|
1 Year
|
Satisfaction reported with pain control and overall procedure
Time Frame: 1 Year
|
Distance (mm) from the left of the 100-mm VAS scale (reflecting degree of satisfaction) recorded post procedure.
|
1 Year
|
Need for additional intraoperative and/or postoperative pain medication
Time Frame: 1 Year
|
Subjects may request additional pain medication once their procedure has begun or in recovery.
The need for additional medication, and what medication was subsequently distributed, will be recorded.
|
1 Year
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Collaborators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Regina M Renner, MD, Oregon Health and Science University
Publications and helpful links
General Publications
- Jensen MP, Chen C, Brugger AM. Interpretation of visual analog scale ratings and change scores: a reanalysis of two clinical trials of postoperative pain. J Pain. 2003 Sep;4(7):407-14. doi: 10.1016/s1526-5900(03)00716-8.
- Renner RM, Jensen JT, Nichols MD, Edelman A. Pain control in first trimester surgical abortion. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2009 Apr 15;2009(2):CD006712. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006712.pub2.
- Belanger E, Melzack R, Lauzon P. Pain of first-trimester abortion: a study of psychosocial and medical predictors. Pain. 1989 Mar;36(3):339-350. doi: 10.1016/0304-3959(89)90094-8.
- O'Connell K, Jones HE, Simon M, Saporta V, Paul M, Lichtenberg ES; National Abortion Federation Members. First-trimester surgical abortion practices: a survey of National Abortion Federation members. Contraception. 2009 May;79(5):385-92. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2008.11.005. Epub 2008 Dec 11.
- Grimes DA, Cates W Jr. Deaths from paracervical anesthesia used for first-trimester abortion, 1972-1975. N Engl J Med. 1976 Dec 16;295(25):1397-9. doi: 10.1056/NEJM197612162952503.
- Rowbotham MC. What is a "clinically meaningful" reduction in pain? Pain. 2001 Nov;94(2):131-132. doi: 10.1016/S0304-3959(01)00371-2. No abstract available.
- Todd KH, Funk KG, Funk JP, Bonacci R. Clinical significance of reported changes in pain severity. Ann Emerg Med. 1996 Apr;27(4):485-9. doi: 10.1016/s0196-0644(96)70238-x.
- Allen RH, Kumar D, Fitzmaurice G, Lifford KL, Goldberg AB. Pain management of first-trimester surgical abortion: effects of selection of local anesthesia with and without lorazepam or intravenous sedation. Contraception. 2006 Nov;74(5):407-13. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2006.06.002. Epub 2006 Aug 2.
- Berger GS, Tyler CW, Harrod EK. Maternal deaths associated with paracervical block anesthesia. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1974 Apr 15;118(8):1142-3. doi: 10.1016/0002-9378(74)90698-x. No abstract available.
- Blanco LJ, Reid PR, King TM. Plasma lidocaine levels following paracervical infiltration for aspiration abortion. Obstet Gynecol. 1982 Oct;60(4):506-8.
- Cetin A, Cetin M. Effect of deep injections of local anesthetics and basal dilatation of cervix in management of pain during legal abortions. A randomized, controlled study. Contraception. 1997 Aug;56(2):85-7. doi: 10.1016/s0010-7824(97)00096-6.
- Donati S, Medda E, Proietti S, Rizzo L, Spinelli A, Subrizi D, Grandolfo ME. Reducing pain of first trimester abortion under local anaesthesia. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 1996 Dec 27;70(2):145-9. doi: 10.1016/s0301-2115(95)02583-9.
- Edelman A, Nichols MD, Leclair C, Astley S, Shy K, Jensen JT. Intrauterine lidocaine infusion for pain management in first-trimester abortions. Obstet Gynecol. 2004 Jun;103(6):1267-72. doi: 10.1097/01.AOG.0000127981.53911.0e.
- Edelman A, Nichols MD, Leclair C, Jensen JT. Four percent intrauterine lidocaine infusion for pain management in first-trimester abortions. Obstet Gynecol. 2006 Feb;107(2 Pt 1):269-75. doi: 10.1097/01.AOG.0000194204.71925.4a.
- Glantz JC, Shomento S. Comparison of paracervical block techniques during first trimester pregnancy termination. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2001 Feb;72(2):171-8. doi: 10.1016/s0020-7292(00)00292-7.
- Gomez PI, Gaitan H, Nova C, Paradas A. Paracervical block in incomplete abortion using manual vacuum aspiration: randomized clinical trial. Obstet Gynecol. 2004 May;103(5 Pt 1):943-51. doi: 10.1097/01.AOG.0000123269.86525.c4.
- Hakim-Elahi E, Tovell HM, Burnhill MS. Complications of first-trimester abortion: a report of 170,000 cases. Obstet Gynecol. 1990 Jul;76(1):129-35.
- Kan AS, Caves N, Wong SY, Ng EH, Ho PC. A double-blind, randomized controlled trial on the use of a 50:50 mixture of nitrous oxide/oxygen in pain relief during suction evacuation for the first trimester pregnancy termination. Hum Reprod. 2006 Oct;21(10):2606-11. doi: 10.1093/humrep/del234. Epub 2006 Jun 21.
- Kan AS, Ng EH, Ho PC. The role and comparison of two techniques of paracervical block for pain relief during suction evacuation for first-trimester pregnancy termination. Contraception. 2004 Aug;70(2):159-63. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2004.03.013.
- Lopez JC, Vigil-De Gracia P, Vega-Malek JC, Ruiz E, Vergara V. A randomized comparison of different methods of analgesia in abortion using manual vacuum aspiration. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2007 Nov;99(2):91-4. doi: 10.1016/j.ijgo.2007.05.023. Epub 2007 Jul 12.
- Miller L, Jensen MP, Stenchever MA. A double-blind randomized comparison of lidocaine and saline for cervical anesthesia. Obstet Gynecol. 1996 Apr;87(4):600-4. doi: 10.1016/0029-7844(95)00463-7.
- Nichols, M. D., Halvorson-Boyd, G., Goldstein, R., Gevirtz, C., & Healow, D. (2009). Pain management. In M. Paul, E. S. Lichtenberg, L. Borgatta, D. A. Grimes & P. G. Stubblefield (Eds.), Management of unintended and abnormal pregnancy. (pp. 90-110): Wiley-Blackwell.
- Owolabi OT, Moodley J. A randomized trial of pain relief in termination of pregnancy in South Africa. Trop Doct. 2005 Jul;35(3):136-9. doi: 10.1258/0049475054620923.
- Phair N, Jensen JT, Nichols MD. Paracervical block and elective abortion: the effect on pain of waiting between injection and procedure. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2002 Jun;186(6):1304-7. doi: 10.1067/mob.2002.123734.
- Rabin JM, Spitzer M, Dwyer AT, Kaiser IH. Topical anesthesia for gynecologic procedures. Obstet Gynecol. 1989 Jun;73(6):1040-4. doi: 10.1097/00006250-198906000-00027.
- Smith GM, Stubblefield PG, Chirchirillo L, McCarthy MJ. Pain of first-trimester abortion: its quantification and relations with other variables. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1979 Mar 1;133(5):489-98. doi: 10.1016/0002-9378(79)90282-5.
- Strauss LT, Gamble SB, Parker WY, Cook DA, Zane SB, Hamdan S; Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Abortion surveillance--United States, 2004. MMWR Surveill Summ. 2007 Nov 23;56(9):1-33.
- Suprapto K, Reed S. Naproxen sodium for pain relief in first-trimester abortion. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1984 Dec 15;150(8):1000-1. doi: 10.1016/0002-9378(84)90399-5.
- Safe Abortion: Technical and Policy Guidance for Health Systems. 2nd edition. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2012. Available from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK138196/
- Wiebe E, Podhradsky L, Dijak V. The effect of lorazepam on pain and anxiety in abortion. Contraception. 2003 Mar;67(3):219-21. doi: 10.1016/s0010-7824(02)00516-4.
- Wiebe ER. Comparison of the efficacy of different local anesthetics and techniques of local anesthesia in therapeutic abortions. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1992 Jul;167(1):131-4. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9378(11)91645-7.
- Wiebe ER, Rawling M. Pain control in abortion. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 1995 Jul;50(1):41-6. doi: 10.1016/0020-7292(95)02416-a.
- Zullo F, Pellicano M, Stigliano CM, Di Carlo C, Fabrizio A, Nappi C. Topical anesthesia for office hysteroscopy. A prospective, randomized study comparing two modalities. J Reprod Med. 1999 Oct;44(10):865-9.
- Renner RM, Nichols MD, Jensen JT, Li H, Edelman AB. Paracervical block for pain control in first-trimester surgical abortion: a randomized controlled trial. Obstet Gynecol. 2012 May;119(5):1030-7. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e318250b13e.
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start
Primary Completion (ACTUAL)
Study Completion (ACTUAL)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (ESTIMATE)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Other Study ID Numbers
- OHSU IRB 6071
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Pain
-
Flowonix MedicalApproved for marketingBack Pain | Leg Pain | Trunk Pain | Intractable Pain | Arm Pain
-
University Hospital Schleswig-HolsteinZealand University Hospital; European Regional Development Fund; Design School...CompletedPain, Acute | Pain, Chronic | Pain Measurement | Pain, CancerGermany
-
Universitat Jaume ICompletedPain, Acute | Pain, Chronic | OncologySpain
-
Dr. Negrin University HospitalCompletedPostoperative Pain, Acute | Postoperative Pain, ChronicSpain
-
Dow University of Health SciencesRecruitingLow Back Pain | Chronic Low-back Pain | Low Back Pain, Mechanical | Mechanical Low Back Pain | Pain, Chronic | Pain, Back | Lower Back Pain Chronic | CLBP - Chronic Low Back PainPakistan
-
George Washington UniversityRecruitingCervical Fusion | Pain, Back | Pain, Neck | Myofacial PainUnited States
-
University of Campinas, BrazilCompletedPREGNANCY | LUMBAR BACK PAIN | PELVIC PAIN
-
Atatürk Chest Diseases and Chest Surgery Training...RecruitingPostoperative Pain | Postoperative Pain, Acute | Postoperative Pain, Chronic | VATSTurkey
-
Janssen Research & Development, LLCCompletedPain, Radiating | Pain, Burning | Pain, Crushing | Pain, Migratory | Pain, SplittingUnited States, France, Spain, Poland, Portugal
-
susanne beckerSNSFCompletedLow Back Pain | Pain, Acute | Pain, ChronicSwitzerland
Clinical Trials on Sham Paracervical Block
-
University of California, San DiegoCompletedPain Due to Intrauterine Contraceptive DeviceUnited States
-
University of HawaiiCompleted
-
Children's Hospital of PhiladelphiaUniversity of Pennsylvania; BayerCompleted
-
Benaroya Research InstituteCompletedPost-Operative PainUnited States
-
Thammasat UniversityCompletedPain, Postoperative | Knee Arthroscopy | Anterior Cruciate Ligament/SurgeryThailand
-
University of Alabama at BirminghamCompletedChronic PancreatitisUnited States
-
University of FloridaUnited States Department of Defense; Brooks RehabilitationRecruiting
-
Queen Elizabeth Hospital NHS Foundation TrustUnknown
-
University of RochesterWithdrawnProstate DiseaseUnited States