B-lymphocyte Depletion Using Rituximab in Chronic Fatigue Syndrome/ Myalgic Encephalopathy (CFS/ME). A Randomized Phase-III Study. (RituxME)

May 10, 2021 updated by: Haukeland University Hospital

B-lymphocyte Depletion Using the Monoclonal Anti-CD20 Antibody Rituximab in Chronic Fatigue Syndrome/ Myalgic Encephalopathy (CFS/ME). A Multicentre, Randomized, Double-blind and Placebo Controlled Phase-III Study With Rituximab Induction and Maintenance Treatment.

The hypothesis is that a subgroup of patients with Chronic Fatigue Syndrome/ Myalgic Encephalopathy (CFS/ME) have a chronically activated immune system and may benefit from B-lymphocyte treatment using the monoclonal anti-CD20 antibody rituximab with induction and maintenance treatment.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

We have published a case series of pilot patient observations with B-cell depletion in Chronic Fatigue Syndrome/ Myalgic Encephalopathy (CFS/ME) (Fluge and Mella, BMC Neurol, 2009). Subsequently, we published a small randomized and double-blind phase II study using rituximab induction two infusions two weeks apart (Fluge et al, Plos One, 2011).

We have completed an open label phase II study with 29 patients using rituximab induction and maintenance treatment (six rituximab infusions over 15 months, with follow-up for three years, unpublished).

We hypothesize that a subgroup of patients with Chronic Fatigue Syndrome/ Myalgic Encephalopathy (CFS/ME) have a chronically activated immune system involving B-lymphocytes, possibly a variant of an autoimmune disease, and that patients may benefit from B-cell depletion therapy.

Three substudies will be performed:

Endothelial function: assessment of Flow-Mediated Dilation and skin microcirculation at baseline and repeated during the time interval 17-21 months.

Cardiopulmonary exercise test for two following days: assessment at baseline and repeated during the time interval 17-21 months.

Gastrointestinal function: assessment at baseline and repeated during the time interval 17-21 months.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

151

Phase

  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Bergen, Norway, N-5021
        • Dept. of Oncology, Haukeland University Hospital
      • Notodden, Norway, N-3675
        • Notodden Hospital
      • Oslo, Norway, N-0424
        • CFS/ME centre, Oslo University Hospital
      • Tromsø, Norway, N-9038
        • Division of Rehabilitation Services, University Hospital of North Norway
      • Trondheim, Norway, N-7006
        • Dept. of Pain and Complex Disorders, St. Olavs Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 65 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with Chronic Fatigue Syndrome/ Myalgic Encephalopathy (CFS/ME) according to Canadian diagnostic criteria (Carruthers, 2003)
  • Duration of CFS/ME disease 2-15 years. For patients with mild CFS/ME duration of disease must be 5-15 years.
  • Mild, Mild/Moderate, Moderate, Moderate/Severe and Severe CFS/ME may be included
  • Signed informed consent

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with fatigue, who do not comply with Canadian diagnostic criteria (2003)
  • Duration of CFS/ME < 2 years or >15 years
  • Patients with very severe CFS/ME
  • Pregnancy or lactation.
  • Previous malignant disease (except basal cell carcinoma in skin or uterine cervical dysplasia)
  • Previous treatment with B-lymphocyte depleting therapeutic monoclonal antibodies, such as rituximab
  • Previous long-term systemic immunosuppressive treatment, including drugs such as cyclosporine, azathioprine, mycophenolate mofetil, but except steroid treatment e.g. for obstructive lung disease or for other autoimmune diseases such as ulcerative colitis
  • Severe endogenous depression
  • Lack of ability to adhere to protocol
  • Known multi-allergy with clinically assessed risk from rituximab infusion
  • Reduced kidney function (serum creatinine > 1,5x upper normal level)
  • Reduced liver function (serum bilirubin or transaminases > 1,5x upper normal level)
  • Known HIV positivity, previous hepatitis B or hepatitis C
  • Evidence of ongoing, active and clinically relevant infection
  • Known immunodeficiency with risk from therapeutic B-cell depletion, such as hypogammaglobulinemia

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Quadruple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Rituximab
Rituximab induction (two infusions two weeks apart) and maintenance (infusions at 3, 6, 9 and 12 months)

Induction with two infusions two weeks apart, rituximab 500 mg/m2 (max 1000 mg).

Maintenance with rituximab infusions (500 mg fixed dose) at 3, 6, 9 and 12 months.

Other Names:
  • Rituxan
  • Mabthera
Placebo Comparator: Placebo
Saline (with added albumin), two infusions two weeks apart, followed by infusions at 3, 6, 9 and 12 months.
Saline (NaCl 0,9%) added human albumin (Flexbumin) 0,4 mg/ml, two infusions two weeks apart. Maintenance infusions after 3,6, 9 and 12 months.
Other Names:
  • Saline

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Fatigue score, selfreported.
Time Frame: Course of Fatigue score during 24 months follow-up.

Selfreported Fatigue score is registered every second week, as the mean score for the four symptoms: "Post-exertional malaise", "Fatigue", "Need for rest", "Daily functioning" (scale 0-6). Mean Fatigue scores for the time intervals 0-4, 4-8, 8-12, 12-16, 16-20, 20-24 months are recorded for each patient. These data are used for statistical analysis. The difference in course of Fatigue score during 24 months follow-up, between the rituximab and placebo groups, will constitute the primary endpoint.

Overall response is recorded as the effect on CFS/ME symptoms during 24 months follow-up. The overall response is not predefined to a specific time interval, but is defined as mean Fatigue score at least 4.5 for at least 8 consecutive weeks for moderate response, and mean Fatigue score at least 5.0 for at least 8 consecutive weeks for major response. Single response periods and the sum of response periods during 24 months follow-up will be recorded.

Course of Fatigue score during 24 months follow-up.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Short Form-36 (SF-36)
Time Frame: Changes in SF-36 scores during 24 months follow-up

SF-36 (ver 1.2) are selfreported by patients at baseline, and at 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21 and 24 months follow-up. Changes in Physical health summary score, Physical function, and "Mean of five subdimensions" (Physical function, Bodily pain, Vitality, Social function, General health) are recorded. The difference in course during 24 months follow-up, between the rituximab and placebo groups, will constitute secondary endpoints.

Also, the difference between rituximab and placebo groups, in changes from baseline to recording at 18 months, for Physical health summary score, Physical function, and "mean of five SF-36 subdimensions", constitute secondary endpoints.

Changes in SF-36 scores during 24 months follow-up
Physical activity (Sensewear armband)
Time Frame: Analyzed at baseline and at interval 17-21 months
The patients' physical activity level, in a home setting for 7 consecutive days, is recorded using Sensewear armbands, with registration at baseline and repeated in the time interval 17-21 months follow-up. Changes from baseline to analysis during the time interval 17-21 months, for mean number of steps per 24h, maximum number of steps per 24h, mean duration per 24h with activity level at least 3.5 METs, max duration per 24h with activity level at least 3.5 METs, are recorded. The difference between rituximab and placebo groups will constitute secondary endpoints.
Analyzed at baseline and at interval 17-21 months
Self-recorded "Function level"
Time Frame: Course during 24 months follow-up

Self-recorded "Function level" (scale 0-100, compared to healthy state, according to a set of examples) are registered every second week. Mean "Function level" for the time intervals 0-4, 4-8, 8-12, 12-16, 16-20, 20-24 months are calculated. The difference in course of "Function level", between the rituximab and placebo groups, constitute a secondary endpoint.

Also, the differences between the rituximab and placebo groups, for changes in selfreported "Fatigue score" and in selfreported "Function level", calculated from baseline to the mean value during the time interval 16-20 months, constitute secondary endpoints.

Course during 24 months follow-up
Fatigue Severity Scale
Time Frame: 24 months
Fatigue Severity Scale (FSS) is self-recorded at baseline and at 6, 12, 18, 24 months. The difference between the rituximab and placebo groups, in changes in FSS from baseline to 18 months follow-up, constitutes a secondary endpoint.
24 months
Clinical response duration
Time Frame: During 24 months follow-up

Clinical response periods, defined as consecutive self-recorded Fatigue score at least 4.5 (scale 0-6) for a minimum of 8 weeks, during 24 months follow-up, are recorded.

The difference in the longest consecutive clinical response period, between rituximab and placebo groups, constitutes a secondary endpoint.

During 24 months follow-up
Sustained clinical response at 24 months
Time Frame: Assessment at 24 months
The difference between rituximab and placebo groups, in fraction of patients with sustained clinical response (defined as Fatigue score of at least 4.5) at 24 months, constitute a secondary endpoint.
Assessment at 24 months

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Toxicity and side-effects
Time Frame: During 24 months follow-up
Toxicity and side effects will be recorded throughout 24 months follow-up, as specified in the protocol.
During 24 months follow-up

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

September 1, 2014

Primary Completion (Actual)

September 1, 2017

Study Completion (Actual)

November 1, 2017

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

August 29, 2014

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 29, 2014

First Posted (Estimate)

September 3, 2014

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

May 11, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 10, 2021

Last Verified

February 1, 2018

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Chronic Fatigue Syndrome/ Myalgic Encephalitis (CFS/ME)

Clinical Trials on Rituximab

3
Subscribe