Ophthalmologic Safety of Long Term Treatment With Pramipexole Compared to Bromocriptine or Other Dopamine Agonists in Patients With Parkinson's Disease

September 4, 2014 updated by: Boehringer Ingelheim

Matched Pair, Assessor Blinded, Open Label Clinical Trial to Assess the Ophthalmologic Safety of Long Term Oral Treatment With Pramipexole Compared to Bromocriptine or Other Dopamine Agonists in Patients With Parkinson's Disease

Study to assess and compare the safety of long term oral treatment for Parkinson's Disease with pramipexole versus bromocriptine or other dopamine agonists, by measuring cross-sectional the incidence of ophthalmologic disturbances, especially signs of retinal degeneration, in a matched pair design

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

705

Phase

  • Phase 4

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child
  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with idiopathic Parkinson's Disease
  • Patients treated consecutively with either pramipexole or bromocriptine (or other dopamine agonists except ropinirole) for at least two and a half years (i.e. 30 months). Interruptions of ongoing dopamine agonists treatment for less than one month per year duration are acceptable, however, interruptions within the last 6 months are not acceptable. Patients currently participating in ongoing open-label extension trials with pramipexole may be included if they meet the requirement of 30 month treatment
  • Written informed consent in accordance with Good Clinical Practice (GCP) and local legislation

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients who have been treated less than two and a half years (i.e. 30 months) with their actual dopamine agonist (regardless of the duration of treatment with a previous dopamine agonist)
  • Patient treated with ropinirole
  • Patients with any of the following:

    • Patients with a hereditary retinal disease and/or a family history of hereditary retinal disease
    • Patients with a history of drug-induced retinopathies
    • Patients with a history of surgically or laser-treated diabetic retinopathy
  • Patients with atypical parkinsonian syndromes due to drugs, metabolic disorders, encephalitis or degenerative diseases (e.g. progressive, supranuclear palsy, multisystem atrophy)
  • Dementia or other disorders that could impair the signing of informed consent
  • Patients who are participating in other drug studies or who receive other investigational drugs within 30 days prior to the first visit (patients currently participating in ongoing open-label extension trials with pramipexole may be included if they meet the requirement of 30 months treatment duration

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Non-Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Pramixpexole
Active Comparator: Bromocriptine and other dopamine agonists

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Incidence of drug related signs of retinal degeneration
Time Frame: up to 8 months
based on the evaluation of assessors blind to the treatment allocation
up to 8 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Assessment of ophthalmological history
Time Frame: within 2 month after neurologic visit
within 2 month after neurologic visit
Assessment of visual acuity
Time Frame: within 2 month after neurologic visit
within 2 month after neurologic visit
Number of abnormal findings in clinical examination in miosis and mydriasis
Time Frame: within 2 month after neurologic visit
including ophthalmoscopy
within 2 month after neurologic visit
Assessment of intraocular pressure (mmHg)
Time Frame: within 2 month after neurologic visit
within 2 month after neurologic visit
Assessment of colour vision
Time Frame: within 2 month after neurologic visit
using the Hardy-Rand-Rittler (H-R-R) pseudoisochromatic plates
within 2 month after neurologic visit
Findings in kinetic perimetry
Time Frame: within 2 month after neurologic visit
within 2 month after neurologic visit
Percentage of patients with elevated dark adaptation thresholds
Time Frame: within 2 month after neurologic visit
within 2 month after neurologic visit
Assessment of Parkinson's Disease stage rated by modified Hoehn and Yahr Scale
Time Frame: within less than 2 months before ophthalmologic visit
within less than 2 months before ophthalmologic visit
Assessment of Parkinson's Disease stage rated of unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) Part IV
Time Frame: within less than 2 months before ophthalmologic visit
within less than 2 months before ophthalmologic visit
Number of patients with adverse events
Time Frame: up to 2 month after neurologic visit
up to 2 month after neurologic visit
Findings in standardised electroretinography (ERG)
Time Frame: within 2 monhts after neurologic visit
performed according to International Standardization Committee for the Electrophysiology of Vision (ISCEV) standard
within 2 monhts after neurologic visit

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Helpful Links

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

June 1, 1998

Primary Completion (Actual)

June 1, 2000

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

September 4, 2014

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 4, 2014

First Posted (Estimate)

September 8, 2014

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

September 8, 2014

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 4, 2014

Last Verified

September 1, 2014

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Parkinson Disease

Clinical Trials on Pramipexole

3
Subscribe