Preoperative Ketamine Has no Preemptive Analgesic Effect in Patients Undergoing Colon Surgery.

September 15, 2014 updated by: Beatriz Nistal Nuno, Hospital Arquitecto Marcide

Preoperative Low-dose Ketamine Has no Preemptive Analgesic Effect in Opioid-naïve Patients Undergoing Colon Surgery When Nitrous Oxide is Used

The analgesic properties of ketamine are associated with its non-competitive antagonism of the N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor; these receptors exhibit an excitatory function on pain transmission and this binding seems to inhibit or reverse the central sensitization of pain. In the literature, the value of this anesthetic for preemptive analgesia in the control of postoperative pain is uncertain. The objective of this study was to ascertain whether preoperative low-dose ketamine reduces postoperative pain and morphine consumption in adults undergoing colon surgery.

In a double-blind, randomized trial, 48 patients were studied. Patients in the ketamine group received 0.5 mg/kg intravenous ketamine before surgical incision, while the control group received normal saline. The postoperative analgesia was achieved with a continuous infusion of morphine at 0.015 mg∙kgˉ¹∙hˉ¹ with the possibility of 0.02 mg/kg bolus every 10 min. Pain was assessed using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS), morphine consumption, and hemodynamic parameters at 0, 1, 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, and 24 hours postoperatively. We quantified times to rescue analgesic (Paracetamol), adverse effects and patient satisfaction.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

In spite of the techniques we have at our disposal and the elementary nature of incisional pain, optimal pain management remains a challenge. Because the severity of early postoperative pain relates to residual pain after some types of surgery, perioperative pain management can considerably influence the long-term quality of life in patients.

Woolf, in 1983, first introduced the theory of preemptive analgesia to attenuate postoperative pain, confirming the presence of a central factor of post-injury pain hypersensitivity in experimental research. After this, experimental studies showed that various anti-nociceptive methods applied before injuries were more effective in reducing post-injury central sensitization in contrast to administration after injury.

After activation of C-fibers by noxious stimuli, sensory neurons become more sensitive to peripheral inputs, a process called central sensitization. 'Wind up, another mechanism activating spinal sensory neurons, is seen after reiterated stimulation of C-fibers. These sensitizations produce c-fos expression in sensory neurons, and are related to the activation of N-methyl-D-aspartic acid (NMDA) and neurokinin receptors. These genes produce long-lasting changes in the pain-processing system, resulting in hyperexcitation. According to Wall, protection of sensory neurons against central sensitization may provide relief from pain after surgery. Based on this assumption, preemptive analgesia has been recommended as an effective aid to control postsurgical pain. NMDA antagonists have been demonstrated to block the induction of central sensitization and revoke the hypersensitivity once it is established.

Ketamine is an old drug that is increasingly being considered for the treatment of acute and chronic pain. Its pharmacology and mechanism of action as an NMDA receptor antagonist are adequately known, but in clinical practice it presents irregular results. Since ketamine is an NMDA-receptor antagonist, it is supposed to avoid or revoke central sensitization, and thus to attenuate postoperative pain.

This antihyperalgesic action can be achieved by smaller doses than those required for anesthesia. Small-dose ketamine has been specified as not more than 1 mg/kg when given as an iv bolus, and not higher than 20 µg∙kgˉ¹∙minˉ¹ when given as a constant infusion.

Low-doses preemptive ketamine administered iv seem to reduce postoperative pain and/or analgesic consumption. According to one study, a single dose of ketamine 1 mg/kg, when administered in conjunction with local anesthetics, opioids or other anesthetics, provides good postoperative pain control.

Regardless of the overwhelming effectiveness of preemptive ketamine in animal experiments, clinical reports are mixed; some authors have described positive effects while others have not.

While early reviews of clinical findings were mostly contradictory, there is still conviction in the effectiveness of preemptive analgesia.

To our knowledge, no prior controlled study has determined the effectiveness of preoperative low-dose iv ketamine as contrasted with placebo in adults after open colon surgery. Thus, this clinical trial was designed to examine the postoperative analgesic effectiveness and opioid-sparing effect of single low-dose iv ketamine in contrast with placebo administered preoperatively.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

48

Phase

  • Phase 4

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • A Coruna
      • Ferrol, A Coruna, Spain, 15405
        • Hospital Arquitecto Marcide

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 75 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • age between 18 and 75 years
  • normal Body Mass Index (18.5 - 24.9)
  • American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) class I, II or III
  • elective surgery
  • surgery time between 60-150 min
  • understanding of the Visual Analog Scale (VAS)
  • lack of allergies or intolerance to anesthetics
  • absence of psychiatric illness

Exclusion Criteria:

  • cognitive deterioration
  • inability to use the Patient-Controlled-Analgesia (PCA) device
  • history of chronic pain syndromes
  • chronic use of analgesics, sedatives, opioids or steroids
  • liver or hematologic disease,
  • history of drug or alcohol abuse
  • intolerance to ketamine or Paracetamol.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Prevention
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Quadruple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Placebo Comparator: Control
In the operating room, the anesthesiologist administered 50 mL of 0.9% saline intravenously to patients in the control group 30 minutes before surgical incision.
Experimental: Ketamine
In the operating room, the anesthesiologist administered 0.5 mg/kg of ketamine chlorhydrate in 50 mL of 0.9 % saline intravenously to patients in the ketamine group 30 minutes before surgical incision. (a single dose).
In the operating room, the anesthesiologist administered 0.5 mg/kg of ketamine chlorhydrate in 50 mL of 0.9 % saline intravenously to patients in the ketamine group 30 minutes before surgical incision (a single dose).
Other Names:
  • ketamine chlorhydrate

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Visual Analog Scale (VAS) score
Time Frame: at 0 hours postoperatively (arrival at recovery room)
The VAS represents a scale with the lowest value as 0 (no pain) and the highest value as 10 (worst imaginable pain).
at 0 hours postoperatively (arrival at recovery room)
Visual Analog Scale (VAS) score
Time Frame: at 1 hour postoperatively
The VAS represents a scale with the lowest value as 0 (no pain) and the highest value as 10 (worst imaginable pain).
at 1 hour postoperatively
Visual Analog Scale (VAS) score
Time Frame: at 2 hours postoperatively
The VAS represents a scale with the lowest value as 0 (no pain) and the highest value as 10 (worst imaginable pain).
at 2 hours postoperatively
Visual Analog Scale (VAS) score
Time Frame: at 4 hours postoperatively
The VAS represents a scale with the lowest value as 0 (no pain) and the highest value as 10 (worst imaginable pain).
at 4 hours postoperatively
Visual Analog Scale (VAS) score
Time Frame: at 8 hours postoperatively
The VAS represents a scale with the lowest value as 0 (no pain) and the highest value as 10 (worst imaginable pain).
at 8 hours postoperatively
Visual Analog Scale (VAS) score
Time Frame: at 12 hours postoperatively
The VAS represents a scale with the lowest value as 0 (no pain) and the highest value as 10 (worst imaginable pain).
at 12 hours postoperatively
Visual Analog Scale (VAS) score
Time Frame: at 16 hours postoperatively
The VAS represents a scale with the lowest value as 0 (no pain) and the highest value as 10 (worst imaginable pain).
at 16 hours postoperatively
Visual Analog Scale (VAS) score
Time Frame: at 24 hours postoperatively
The VAS represents a scale with the lowest value as 0 (no pain) and the highest value as 10 (worst imaginable pain).
at 24 hours postoperatively

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
morphine consumption
Time Frame: at 0, 1, 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, and 24 hours postoperatively
The cumulative amounts of morphine (mg) administered through the Patient-Controlled-Analgesia (PCA) device as a basal infusion and the incremental supplemental bolus required by the patient were documented at these time points.
at 0, 1, 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, and 24 hours postoperatively

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Blood Pressure (BP) systolic
Time Frame: at 0, 1, 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, and 24 hours postoperatively
Measured in mm Hg. We evaluated these hemodynamic parameters as an indirect measure of pain.
at 0, 1, 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, and 24 hours postoperatively
Blood Pressure (BP) diastolic
Time Frame: at 0, 1, 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, and 24 hours postoperatively
Measured in mm Hg. We evaluated these hemodynamic parameters as an indirect measure of pain
at 0, 1, 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, and 24 hours postoperatively
Heart rate
Time Frame: at 0, 1, 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, and 24 hours postoperatively.
We evaluated these hemodynamic parameters as an indirect measure of pain
at 0, 1, 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, and 24 hours postoperatively.
Respiratory rate
Time Frame: at 0, 1, 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, and 24 hours postoperatively.
We evaluated these hemodynamic parameters as an indirect measure of pain.
at 0, 1, 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, and 24 hours postoperatively.
Time for the first demand of analgesia
Time Frame: 24 h postoperatively.
The time interval to first solicited rescue analgesia in the 24 h postoperatively (in minutes). This rescue analgesia was administered if the established analgesic treatment was not sufficient to alleviate pain.
24 h postoperatively.
Number of rescue doses
Time Frame: 24 h postoperatively
The number of times a rescue analgesic dose was administered as a supplement in the first postoperative 24 hours.
24 h postoperatively
Satisfaction score
Time Frame: 24 hours postoperatively
Global patient satisfaction (0-3), regarding pain control, was measured 24 hours after the operation
24 hours postoperatively
Side effects
Time Frame: 24 hours postoperatively
Number of Participants with Serious and Non-Serious Adverse Events in the 24 hours postoperatively
24 hours postoperatively

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Chair: Manuel Camba Rodriguez, M.D., Hospital Arquitecto Marcide
  • Principal Investigator: Beatriz Nistal Nuno, M.D., Complexo Hospitalario Universitario A Coruña
  • Study Director: Enrique Freire-Vila, M.D., Complexo Hospitalario Universitario A Coruña
  • Principal Investigator: Francisco Castro Seoane, M.D., Hospital Arquitecto Marcide

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

September 1, 2001

Primary Completion (Actual)

June 1, 2002

Study Completion (Actual)

June 1, 2002

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

September 11, 2014

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 15, 2014

First Posted (Estimate)

September 16, 2014

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

September 16, 2014

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 15, 2014

Last Verified

September 1, 2014

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Pain, Postoperative

Clinical Trials on Ketamine

Subscribe