Efficacy of Transitional Case Management Following Psychiatric Hospital Discharge

October 2, 2014 updated by: Charles Bonsack, University of Lausanne Hospitals

Efficacy of Transitional Case Management Following Psychiatric Hospital Discharge: a Randomized Trial

Efficacy of transitional case management following psychiatric hospital discharge: a randomized trial

Background The movement of deinstitutionalisation in Western societies has modified the role of psychiatric hospital, which has lost its asylum function to become a place for acute care.

Psychiatric stays are now shorter and close interactions with the outpatient care network is therefore more critical than before. The first weeks following discharge from psychiatric hospital represent a period of high risk for relapse, readmission or even suicide. Case management has a proven efficacy in facilitating patients' deinstitutionalisation after very long hospitalisations and in stabilizing high users of psychiatric care. In contrast, studies exploring the impact of time limited case management following discharge from short stays (transitional case management) in earlier phases of psychiatric disorders in connection with primary care are lacking.

Working Hypotheses The investigators hypothesize that transitional case management following hospital discharge decreases risk of readmission, improves adherence to outpatient care, facilitates recovery and improves patients' satisfaction with treatment as compared to routine care.

Specific Aims In this study, the investigators will compare the impact of both intervention on number of contact and level of adherence to outpatient care. The investigators will also compare both groups on number of readmission, risk of early aggravation of the disorders, level of functioning and satisfaction with care.

Methods This is a randomized single-blind study comparing transitional case management after discharge with routine post-hospitalization care for subjects living independently without institutional psychiatric follow-up. Demographic and clinical data will be gathered during hospitalization, and 1, 3, 6 and 12 months after discharge. Quantitative assessment of outcomes using validated instruments will be: contact and level of adherence to outpatient care (primary outcomes), as well as number of hospitalization days, number of readmissions, severity of illness and satisfaction with care (secondary outcomes).

Expected Value of the Proposed Project This study should improve psychiatric patients follow-up in collaboration with the different levels of care in the global context of deinstitutionalization.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

110

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • VD
      • Prilly, VD, Switzerland, 1008
        • Social Psychiatry Section, Lausanne University Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 65 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients are 18-65 years of age
  • No immediate institutional follow up after discharge
  • Independent living condition

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Organic brain disease
  • Clinically significant concurrent illnesses
  • Poor understanding of French

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: standard care
Routine hospitalization care is broadly defined as the usual level of care in the context of the adult department of psychiatry of the CHUV (Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois).
Experimental: transitional case management
The case management activity deals with organizational and clinical aspects. The objective is to focus on network's expectations during hospitalization and at discharge, and ensure contacts between hospital and patient' social network. The aim is to support patient during the transition phase following discharge

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Adherence to outpatient care
Time Frame: one year
Information on admission, diagnoses, notes on problems of compliance, preparation for hospital discharge and links with outpatient care using the Boyer Scale (Boyer, McAlpine, Pottick et al. 2000)
one year
Working alliance
Time Frame: one year
Assessment of the relationship between patient and care provider uning the Working Alliance Inventory, short version (WAI-SRp) (Horvath, 1984; Hatcherr & Gillaspy, 2006; translation : Baillargeon & Leduc, 2000; de Roten, 2006)
one year
Number of readmissions
Time Frame: one year
Socio-demographic assessment of service receipt (use of services, length of hospitalization and number of readmissions) and medication profile using the Client Socio-Demographic and Service Receipt Inventory (CSSRI - EU) (Chisholm et al., 2000)
one year
Degree of psychiatric symptoms
Time Frame: one year
Assessment of psychiatric symptoms (global severity, diversity of symptoms and degree of discomfort) using the Symptom check-list (SCL-90 R) (Derogatis, 1977; French translation: Guelfi et Dreyfus,1984)
one year
Hopelessness
Time Frame: one year
Assessment of the risks of suicide attempts or of suicide. Assessment of pessimism using the Hopelessness Scale - Questionnaire H (Hopelessness scale) (Beck, 1974; translation Cottraux, 1985)
one year
Substance use
Time Frame: one year
Assessment of alcohol and drug consumption (prevalence and frequency) using an extract from " Cannabis and Substance Use Assessment Scale " (CASUAS) (Edwards et al., 2003)
one year
Perceived Improvement
Time Frame: one year
Assessment of the patient's perception of clinical improvement using the Perceived Improvement questionnaire (Perreault, 2003)
one year
Severity of mental health problems
Time Frame: one year
Assessment of the severity of mental health problems (behavior, handicap, symptoms, social) using the Health of Nation Outcome Scale (HoNOS) (Wing & Curtis, 1996; Lauzon et al. 2001)
one year
Global Assessment of Functioning
Time Frame: one year
Assessment of the patient's level of global functioning on a scale of 0 to 100 using the Global Assessment of Functioning (GAF), (Endicott, Spitzer et al 1976; translation Guelfi, Boyer, 1989)
one year
Social and Occupational Functioning
Time Frame: one year
Assessment of the levels of social and professional functioning on a scale of 0 to 100 using the Social and Occupational Functioning Assessment Scale (SOFAS) (Goldman, Skodol et Lave, 1992)
one year
Social support
Time Frame: one year
Assessment of the network's and of the patient's perception regarding availability using the " Social Support " questionnaire (Community Mental Health Evaluation Initiative, CMHEI, 2001)
one year
Empowerment
Time Frame: one year
Measure of empowerment using the "Empowerment" questionnaire (Community Mental Health Evaluation Initiative, CMHEI, 2001)
one year
Satisfaction
Time Frame: one year
Assessment of the degree of satisfaction of users of psychiatric services using the Client's Satisfaction Questionnaire (CSQ- 8) (Larsen, 1979; translation Chambon, 1992)
one year

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Charles Bonsack, MD, Lausanne University Hospital

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

October 1, 2007

Primary Completion (Actual)

April 1, 2009

Study Completion (Actual)

April 1, 2009

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

September 29, 2014

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 2, 2014

First Posted (Estimate)

October 7, 2014

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

October 7, 2014

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 2, 2014

Last Verified

October 1, 2014

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • CMT

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Mental Disorders

Clinical Trials on Transitional Case Management

Subscribe