Stepping Up for Safety: Improving Teamwork at the Planned Parenthood Affiliates Through the TeamSTEPPS Model

November 21, 2020 updated by: Maureen Paul, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center

TeamSTEPPS (Team Strategies and Tools to Enhance Performance and Patient Safety) is an evidence-based teamwork system designed to improve communication and teamwork skills among health professionals. The program was developed by the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) and the Department of Defense's Patient Safety Program as the national standard for team training in health care.

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the effect of the TeamSTEPPS program on the team knowledge, skills and attitudes and patient safety at Planned Parenthood affiliates nationwide.

The investigators hypothesize that implementation of the TeamSTEPPS program will be associated with improved team knowledge, skills, and attitudes; clinical outcomes; and process outcomes.

Aims:

  1. To assess the effect of the TeamSTEPPS training program on team communication and effective team work
  2. To assess the effect of the TeamSTEPPS training program on process outcomes
  3. To assess the effect of the TeamSTEPPS training program on clinical outcomes

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

In 1999, the healthcare community received a wake-up call when the Institute of Medicine's landmark report, To Err Is Human, [IOM, 1999] revealed that up to 98,000 Americans die each year from medical errors, with several more thousand injured. Most medical errors result from systems deficiencies, and they include such events as missed or delayed diagnoses and medication errors. The morbidity, mortality, and associated costs that result from medical errors can have far-reaching consequences, not only for patients and their families, but also for caregivers, health care organizations, and the community at large.

Publication of the IOM report heralded a seismic shift in the culture and delivery of health care as medical facilities sought to identify and redesign vulnerable systems to make them safer. Most efforts to date have concentrated on hospital-based systems, however, and a tremendous need exists to adapt "lessons learned" and patient safety strategies and tools to ambulatory-care facilities [Sclafani 2012]. Toward that end, Affiliates Risk Management Services, Inc. (ARMS), the risk management foundation for Planned Parenthood of America (PPFA), is partnering with Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center/Harvard Medical School (BIDMC/HMS) and the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) to bring team training to PPFA's large clinical network. This network is comprised of 74 affiliates operating ambulatory health centers throughout the United States that provide reproductive health services to approximately 3 million women and men annually.

Implementation of a medical teamwork system has been associated with reduced medical errors, improved clinical and process outcomes, and medical and liability cost savings [Colla 2005; Mann 2006; Pratt 2007; Neilsen 2007, Neily 2010; Gillespie 2010; Weaver 2010; Moffatt 2012; Gluck 2012; Sawyer 2013]. For example, in a recent large study involving more than 100,000 surgical procedures in 100 Veterans Administration hospitals, patients whose surgical staff had undergone team training experienced a 50% greater decline in surgical mortality than those whose staff had not been team-trained [Neily 2010]. In a seminal study at BIDMC/HMS, implementation of a team training initiative among labor and delivery staff resulted in a 50% decrease both in the incidence of adverse obstetrical outcomes and the number of high severity malpractice claims, representing a savings of several million dollars [Mann 2006, Pratt 2007]. Team training results in higher quality, safer care by producing high performing teams, clarifying roles and responsibilities, improving information sharing, and eliminating barriers to quality and safety. Moreover, team training has the potential to help shift the organizational culture of health care institutions from hierarchical models to ones that foster team learning, collaboration, transparency, and open communication.

The move toward greater safety in health care is not only the "right thing to do" for patients, but it has become a national imperative. Nearly half of The Joint Commission's standards for accreditation of health care facilities directly relate to patient safety [The Joint Commission, online 2013], and effective communication and team work are key components of the American Congress of Obstetricians and Gynecologists' [ACOG] recently-launched voluntary accreditation program for medical office settings [Sclafani et al. 2012]. Indeed, the ability to thrive in the new environment of health care reform demands delivery of care that is safe, high-quality, efficient, and cost-effective, all characteristics affected by team training. The time has come to bring the benefits of team training to the Planned Parenthood network and the myriad patients who turn to Planned Parenthood as their trusted health care provider.

This is a prospective cohort study to evaluate the effect of the TeamSTEPPS program on team knowledge, skills and attitudes, process outcomes, and clinical outcomes in Planned Parenthood affiliates in the United States.

Study Population: Planned Parenthood affiliate employees and clients will serve as the study population for this study. Some endpoints, such as attitudes about team work, will rely on client and employee surveys pre- and post-intervention. Process outcomes such as frequency of team briefs will rely on affiliate documentation of the frequency of these events pre- and post-intervention. Clinical outcomes, such as adverse events, will utilize the secure online de-identified reporting system, ARMS Risk Management Information System (AIMS).

Intervention: During a two-year period, ARMS/BIDMC plans to offer TeamSTEPPS master training for key staff from 16 Planned Parenthood affiliates and to assist these master trainers as they implement targeted improvements through team training at the affiliate level. TeamSTEPPS, an evidence-based teamwork system designed to improve communication and teamwork skills among health professionals, was developed by AHRQ and the Department of Defense's Patient Safety Program as the national standard for team training in health care [AHRQ on line; Sheppard et al. 2013]. Faculty members from AHRQ's TeamSTEPPS national training center at the University of Washington have agreed to provide a dedicated master training course for Planned Parenthood affiliates. ARMS will work with the faculty to adapt the TeamSTEPPS curriculum to the Planned Parenthood clinical context.

Procedures:

The training and implementation cycle includes the following main components that are occurring independent of the evaluation:

  1. Developing a Teamwork Improvement Action Plan Using a guide developed by AHRQ, ARMS staff and BIDMC/HMS faculty will work with each participating affiliate to develop a Teamwork Improvement Action Plan prior to the master training program. The purpose is to help each affiliate prepare for team training by identifying an appropriate training team and determining two to three key targets for improvement through team training, how the intervention will be implemented, and how to measure success.

  2. TeamSTEPPS Master Training Each of the selected affiliates will send a 2-4 person team to a 2-day TeamSTEPPS "train the trainer" program in June 2014. The teams will be multidisciplinary (for example, quality leader, physician, nurse manager) and consist of leaders who are well-positioned by their roles to offer team training to frontline surgical abortion staff at their affiliates.

    The training curriculum teaches practical tools and strategies, such as briefs, huddles, debriefs, time outs, and SBAR (situation - background - assessment - recommendation) communication skills that when practiced regularly, cultivate the core team skills necessary for effective team work.

  3. TeamSTEPPS Implementation at the Clinic Level Following the master training, the TeamSTEPPS master trainers will implement their Action Plans at their affiliates.
  4. Continued Training and Sustainability ARMS staff will advise and support the new master trainers as they reinforce the principles and skills of TeamSTEPPS on an ongoing basis. In addition, the trainers will be encouraged to participate in AHRQ's TeamSTEPPS user support network, which includes web conferences and an online discussion forum, as well as AHRQ's annual TeamSTEPPS national conference.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

40

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child
  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Planned Parenthood employee
  • Planned Parenthood client

Exclusion Criteria:

  • None

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Other
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Other: Team training
All participating affiliates will undergo team training using the TeamSTEPPS model
Behavioral: Team training using the TeamSTEPPS model
Two or three master trainers from each affiliate will be undergo train-the-trainer training to bring back to their affiliate.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in team attitudes and perceptions
Time Frame: Pre-intervention, six months post-intervention, and every 12 months thereafter
Surveys will be completed by staff at each affiliate; additional surveys will be completed anonymously by patients regarding their perceptions of teamwork among the affiliate staff members involved in their care. These measures will be used to create a composite measure, and change from baseline to each of the study time-points will be assessed.
Pre-intervention, six months post-intervention, and every 12 months thereafter
Change in process outcomes and behavioral change
Time Frame: Pre-intervention, six months post-intervention, and every 12 months thereafter
A designated staff member at each affiliate will complete a questionnaire regarding site practices such as the use of time-outs and the occurrence of briefs and debriefs. These outcomes will be combined as a composite measure, and change from baseline to each of the study time-points will be assessed.
Pre-intervention, six months post-intervention, and every 12 months thereafter
Change in clinical outcomes
Time Frame: Pre-intervention, six months post-intervention, and every 12 months thereafter
Adverse outcomes are collected by AIMS and will be reported in a de-identified report to the research team. All adverse outcomes will be combined to create a composite measure, and change from baseline to each of the study time-points will be assessed.
Pre-intervention, six months post-intervention, and every 12 months thereafter
Change in patient cycle times
Time Frame: Six-month period before intervention and for six months after a six-month washout period after intervention
Organizations track the time that patients spend in the clinic such that changes in patient cycle time (intake to exit) can be measured
Six-month period before intervention and for six months after a six-month washout period after intervention

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center

Collaborators

Affiliates Risk Management Services, Inc.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Maureen E Paul, MD, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

February 1, 2014

Primary Completion (Actual)

November 1, 2020

Study Completion (Actual)

November 1, 2020

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

September 25, 2014

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 8, 2014

First Posted (Estimate)

October 9, 2014

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

November 24, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 21, 2020

Last Verified

November 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 2014P000045

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Team training using the TeamSTEPPS model

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

CROs by country

CROs in Burundi

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Subscribe