HIV Risk and Prevention in Women

February 20, 2017 updated by: University of Oklahoma

Collaborative Biosocial Research on HIV Risk and Prevention in Women

This study gathers information about HIV testing utilization and influences on HIV testing decisions among young, general population Russian women at-risk of HIV exposure. The study compares HIV testing acceptance across two types of low-barrier testing strategies (opt-in vs. opt-out) and conducts one of the first randomized experimental comparisons of these strategies. The overarching goal is to gain knowledge that can be used to increase utilization of HIV testing among at-risk young women and offer gender-specific strategies for improving prevention.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Detailed Description

The study uses an adaptive design. That is, the procedures and phases of the study experienced by a participant depend to some extent on their responses to earlier phases. Ultimately, this design yields a number of practice relevant pathways and endpoints, each of which has a testing rate associated with it.

Phase-I is initial screening for risk status, collecting background data, and ascertaining whether there has been recent independent HIV testing. If there has been independent testing, information about the independent testing is collected and the participant's involvement is complete.

Those who are not independent testers enter Phase-II. Phase II will include: randomization to opt-in vs. opt-out conditions; a survey asking about reasons for acceptance or non-acceptance; participating in a focus group in which participants who have not accepted HIV testing (non-accepters) and those who accepted (accepters) will be asked to discuss their health beliefs related to HIV prevention, barriers and reasons for testing/not testing; then (5) after the focus group is complete, privately offer another testing opportunity to non-accepters, under the same opt-in or opt-out strategy to which they previously were randomized. The design was selected in order simultaneously answer a number of questions that we believe will be important for engineering a testing and prevention strategy suitable for testing in a subsequent study: (1) identify key attitudes, beliefs and knowledge (survey); (2) contrast opt-in and opt-out strategies (randomized trial); (3) generate qualitative data about reasons for decisions in the women's own words (focus group); and (4) identify any incremental benefit related to peer discussion.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

200

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • St. Peterburg, Russian Federation, 199034
        • St. Petersburg State University
    • Oklahoma
      • Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, United States, 73104
        • University of Oklahoma

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 44 years (Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

Female

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • The participant's sexual risk behaviors (i.e., a) two or more partners in the last 12 months, or her partner's HIV risk (e.g., HIV positive, no HIV testing and a diagnosis of sexually transmitted diseases in last 12 months, multiple partners, blood transmission, male partners, served in prison, or drug use) and no or inconsistent condom use in the last 3 months, and no HIV testing in the last 12 months, or b) any sexually-transmitted disease and no HIV testing in the last 12 months).

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Does not speak Russian, are currently pregnant, have a condition that might preclude a finger-stick procedure, or have tested HIV positive in the past.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Prevention
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Opt-in testing
Common barriers to HIV screening testing will be removed as much as possible (i.e., providing rapid testing, results shortly available, testing on-site, confidentiality). The research assistant will say: "There is voluntary HIV testing available to all study participants if you wish to do it. It is free, private, it is only a finger stick, and you will learn your HIV results in just minutes." Participants will be scheduled for a two-hour appointment to complete the written consent procedure, enroll in the study, and participate in the study activities, testing and a focus group.
Study participants will be offered a health screening onsite.
Study participants will be invited to participate in a focus group discussion.
Experimental: Opt-out testing
Participants will be informed that a routine health test bundle is available on a voluntary basis to study participants, and the participant may elect to decline all or any individual part of the testing. The assistant will say: "We are offering a voluntary panel of routine health screening test today for study participants. It includes blood sugar, cholesterol, and HIV. We recommend all of them for everyone, but you can choose to decline any or all of them. This is free, private, it is only a finger stick, and you will learn your results for all the tests in just minutes." Participants will be scheduled for a two-hour appointment to complete the written consent procedure, enroll in the study, and participate in the study activities, testing and a focus group.
Study participants will be offered a health screening onsite.
Study participants will be invited to participate in a focus group discussion.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number of participants who accepted a rapid health screening/HIV test
Time Frame: At first visit, an expected average of 1 hour
Women's decision to take/not take a health screening test/HIV test is recorded. If a woman chooses to be tested, she will be asked a few questions to assess her reasons for being tested. She will be provided with the results of the testing. If a woman's test is positive for HIV (or other health risks in the bundled opt-out condition), counseling with a trained study nurse, physician or psychologist will be available on-site and a referral for additional testing, counseling, and appropriate medical care will be provided.
At first visit, an expected average of 1 hour
Number of participants who accepted the health screening/HIV test after a focus group
Time Frame: After completing a focus group discussion, an expected average of 4 weeks
participating in a focus group in which participants who have not accepted HIV testing (non-accepters) and those who accepted (accepters) will be asked to discuss their health beliefs related to HIV prevention, barriers and reasons for testing/not testing; then (5) after the focus group is complete, privately offer another testing opportunity to non-accepters, under the same opt-in or opt-out strategy to which they previously were randomized.
After completing a focus group discussion, an expected average of 4 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Brief survey to assess reasons for being tested
Time Frame: At first visit, an expected average of 1 hour
Participants who accepted a rapid health screening/HIV test are asked about reasons for taking the test at this time.
At first visit, an expected average of 1 hour

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Alla Shaboltas, PhD, Facility: St. Petersburg State University St. Peterburg, Russian Federation

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

March 1, 2014

Primary Completion (Actual)

January 1, 2016

Study Completion (Actual)

January 1, 2016

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

September 26, 2014

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 7, 2014

First Posted (Estimate)

October 13, 2014

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

February 23, 2017

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 20, 2017

Last Verified

February 1, 2017

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 3878
  • 1R21AA022596-01 (U.S. NIH Grant/Contract)

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on HIV

Clinical Trials on Opt-in or Opt-out testing

Subscribe