Comparative Effectiveness of Ultrasound and Paraffin Therapy in Patients With Carpal Tunnel Syndrome: A Randomized Trial

The purpose of this study is to compare the efficacy of combining a wrist orthosis with either ultrasound therapy or paraffin bath therapy in treating carpal tunnel syndrome patients.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Detailed Description

The purpose of this exploratory study is to compare the combination of a wrist orthosis with either ultrasound therapy or paraffin bath therapy in the treatment of carpal tunnel syndrome patients. We hypothesized that ultrasound therapy might be more effective than paraffin therapy because it provides both thermal and nonthermal effects.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

60

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • patients to have subjective symptoms (such as pain and/or numbness in the median nerve distribution of the digits or nocturnal pain). Furthermore, patients were required to have either a positive Phalen's sign or a positive Tinel's sign along with electrophysiological evidence of carpal tunnel syndrome.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • (1) age younger than 18 years old; (2) underlying medical disorders, such as diabetes mellitus, renal failure, autoimmune disease or hypothyroidism; and (3) pregnancy, previous wrist trauma or surgery.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
  • Allocation: RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: PARALLEL
  • Masking: NONE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: ultrasound therapy group
Patients in the ultrasound therapy group were treated with US therapy for 5 minutes each session, twice per week for 8 weeks.
Patients in the ultrasound therapy group were treated with US therapy for 5 minutes each session, twice per week for 8 weeks.
Active Comparator: paraffin therapy group
Patients in the paraffin therapy group were treated with the dip-and-wrap method of paraffin bath therapy in the hospital twice per week for 8 weeks. The temperature of the paraffin bath was maintained at approximately 55°C
Patients in the paraffin therapy group were treated with the dip-and-wrap method of paraffin bath therapy in the hospital twice per week for 8 weeks. The temperature of the paraffin bath was maintained at approximately 55°C

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Functional Status Scale of the Boston Carpal Tunnel Syndrome Questionnaire
Time Frame: 8 weeks
All of the answers were scored from 1 to 5 according to the patient's clinical condition, such that 1 indicated no symptoms, and 5 indicated the most severe symptoms.
8 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Symptom Severity Scale of the Boston Carpal Tunnel Syndrome Questionnaire
Time Frame: 8 weeks
All of the answers were scored from 1 to 5 according to the patient's clinical condition, such that 1 indicated no symptoms, and 5 indicated the most severe symptoms.
8 weeks
Pain Scale
Time Frame: 8 weeks
The pain VAS is a continuous scale comprised 10 centimeters (100 mm) in length. 0 indicate no pain, 100 indicate maximum pain.
8 weeks
Difference of Monofilament Sensory Test (Before and After Treatment)
Time Frame: 8 weeks
The Semmes-Weinstein monofilament sensory test was measured by applying force-calibrated nylon filament to the fingertips with the wrist in a neutral supine position A weighted score from 1 to 5 was acquired according to each filament's calculated force . We recorded the scores from seven sample areas in each hand and summed the scores to analyze as a continuous variable.Higher score indicate decreased finger tip sensation with increased disesase severity.Total score range:7 -35.
8 weeks
Difference in Palmar Pinch Power Test (Before and After Treatment)
Time Frame: 8 weeks
Palmar pinch strength was measured by pressing the thumb and the index finger tip against a standard dynamometer. This procedure was repeated 3 times measuring in kilograms, and a mean score was obtained. Higher score indicate better pinching strength, which indicate less disease severity. Score range: minimum :0 kilogram
8 weeks
Difference in the Distal Sensory Latencies of the Median Nerve (Before and After Treatment)
Time Frame: 8 weeks
A standard distance (14 centimeter) was maintained between the stimulator and recording electrodes for the sensory nerve conduction studies. Increased distal latency indicate delay of nerve conduction, which imply poor disease progress.
8 weeks
Difference in the Distal Motor Latencies of the Median Nerve (Before and After Treatment)
Time Frame: 8 weeks
Median motor nerve conduction and distal motor latency were measured by placing a stimulating electrode at the wrist and a recording electrode on the abductor pollicis brevis muscle 8 centimeter from the stimulus electrode. Increased distal latency indicate delay of nerve conduction, which imply poor disease progress.
8 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Yi Shiung Horng, Taipei TzuChi Hospital

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

January 1, 2010

Primary Completion (Actual)

December 1, 2011

Study Completion (Actual)

December 1, 2011

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

October 13, 2014

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 28, 2014

First Posted (Estimate)

October 29, 2014

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

February 24, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 8, 2021

Last Verified

March 1, 2017

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Carpal Tunnel Syndrome

Clinical Trials on ultrasound

Subscribe