Adverse Effects of Red Blood Cell Transfusions: A Unifying Hypothesis (Aim 3) (INOBA)

April 7, 2016 updated by: John D Roback, Emory University

Adverse Effects of Red Blood Cell Transfusions: A Unifying Hypothesis

Transfusion of red blood cells is often used in critically ill patients with low red blood cell counts to prevent disease progression and death. Recent studies suggest that the use of "aged" versus "fresh" red blood cells are associated with worse clinical outcomes. There is evidence that red blood cells work with the cells lining our blood vessels to produce a variety of substances that normally cause arteries to relax and increase blood supply. Two of these substances are called nitric oxide (NO) and endothelium-derived hyperpolarizing factor (EDHF). The investigators are trying to determine the nature of these substances in human beings when they are transfused "aged" versus "fresh" red blood cells. The purpose of the study is to test the effects of transfusing "aged" versus "fresh" red blood cells in volunteers with traditional cardiovascular risk factors (high blood pressure, diabetes, high cholesterol, and tobacco use) on 1) the degree of relaxation in the arteries and subsequent changes in blood flow, 2) blood levels of oxidant molecules, 3) inflammation, and 4) stem cells.

A similar study with healthy volunteers are further described in NCT00838331.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Transfusion of red blood cells (RBCs) is often effective at preventing morbidity and mortality in anemic patients. In contrast, recent studies indicate that some RBC components may have functional defects ("RBC storage lesions") that actually cause morbidity and mortality when transfused. For example, patients transfused with RBCs stored >14 days have statistically worse outcomes than those receiving "fresher" RBC units. In addition to the age of stored RBCs, the volume transfused may be important. The Transfusion Requirements in Critical Care (TRICC) study showed that specific patients whose transfusions were limited by a restrictive trigger (RBCs transfusions only when hemoglobin [Hb] < 7 g/dL) had significantly better outcomes than those transfused with a more liberal trigger ([Hb] < 10 g/dL Hb). This finding has been particularly difficult to understand since conventional wisdom suggests that an elevated [Hb] should be beneficial because it supports increased oxygen (O2) delivery. Recipient-specific factors may also contribute to the occurrence of these adverse events. Unfortunately, these events have been difficult to investigate because up to now they have existed only as "statistical occurrences" of increased morbidity and mortality in large data sets. There are currently no clinical or laboratory methods to detect or study them in individual patients.

The microcirculation is composed of a continuum of small vessels including small arterioles, capillaries, and post-capillary venules. The microcirculation represents an actively-adjusting vascular circuit that matches blood flow (and O2 delivery) to local tissue oxygen demands. While the physiologic mechanisms that match O2 delivery to local requirements are incompletely understood, endothelium-derived nitric oxide (NO) clearly plays an important role. Interestingly, recent work has revealed that in addition to transporting O2 and carbon dioxide (CO2), the RBC also controls local NO concentrations and thus may also play a surprisingly important role in regulating blood flow in the microcirculation.

Herein, the investigators bring together previously unconnected data to propose a unifying hypothesis, centered on insufficient NO bioavailability (INOBA), to explain the increased morbidity and mortality observed in some patients following RBC transfusion. In this model, variables associated with RBC units (storage time; 2,3-diphosphoglycerate (2,3-DPG) concentration) and transfusion recipients (endothelial dysfunction; hematocrit [Hct]) collectively lead to changes in NO levels in vascular beds. Under certain circumstances, these variables are "aligned" such that NO concentrations are markedly reduced, leading to vasoconstriction, decreased local blood flow and insufficient O2 delivery to end organs. Under these circumstances, the likelihood of morbidity and mortality escalates. The INOBA hypothesis is attractive because of its explanatory power and because it leads to a number of readily testable predictions, which will be investigated t determine the effects of transfused RBCs in patients with endothelial dysfunction due to cardiovascular disease. A non-invasive ultrasound assay will be used to test whether patients with cardiovascular disease and endothelial dysfunction (who have intrinsic defects in NO synthesis) are more susceptible to adverse effects from stored/processed RBCs (impaired in NO bioavailability) than fresh RBC units. Vasodilation and tissue oxygenation in response to transfusion will be monitored, and Framingham risk scores and cardiovascular disease biomarkers will be tested as potential predictive factors to identify patients most at risk from adverse effects of RBC transfusions.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

43

Phase

  • Phase 2

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Georgia
      • Atlanta, Georgia, United States, 30322
        • Emory University

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 80 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Inpatient or outpatient at Emory University Hospital who's physicians have ordered a transfusion of packed red blood cells (pRBCs) of 1 or more units
  • Cardiovascular risk factors (hypercholesterolemia, diabetes, hypertension, and tobacco smoking) or known cardiovascular disease) will be carefully documented for each subject

Cardiac risk factors are defined as follows:

  • Hypercholesterolemia: Defined as serum low density lipoprotein cholesterol > 140 mg/dL if not currently on lipid-lowering therapy or > 100 mg/dL if on lipid-lowering therapy
  • Diabetes: Defined as having fasting blood glucose sample of > 126 mg/dL or a hemoglobin A1c of > 7% or being treated with diabetes medications such as oral hypoglycemic agents, insulin sensitizing agents, or subcutaneous insulin
  • Smoking: active tobacco use, 20 cigarettes per day for the past year
  • Hypertension: Blood pressure of > 140/90 or currently on anti-hypertensive medications
  • Cardiovascular disease: known coronary artery disease by angiogram or documented myocardial infarction

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Pregnancy
  • Previous transfusion within one week.
  • Inability to give informed consent
  • On oral or IV nitrate therapy
  • On vasopressor agents
  • Active illicit drug use

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Storage-aged red blood cells (saRBCs)
Subjects with cardiovascular disease (CVD) received a transfusion with older stored red blood cells (RBCs) units. The units had been stored for greater than 21 days.
Packed RBCs units stored for greater than 21 days, with a mean storage duration of 29.6 ± 4.9 days (mean ± SD)
Active Comparator: Fresh red blood cells (RBCs)
Subjects with cardiovascular disease (CVD) received a transfusion with fresh red blood cells (RBCs) units. The units had been stored for less than 14 days.
Packed RBCs units stored for less than 14 days, with a mean storage duration of 9.6 ± 3.9 days (mean ± SD)

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Brachial Artery Flow-mediated Dilation (FMD) After Fresh Red Blood Cells (RBCs) Transfusions vs. Storage-aged Red Blood Cells (saRBCs) Transfusions at Baseline
Time Frame: Baseline
Ultrasonography of the brachial artery performed at the bedside using a high-resolution 10-megahertz (MHz) ultrasound transducer before and after suprasystolic inflation of a blood pressure cuff for 5 minutes in the ipsilateral upper arm. Brachial artery FMD was calculated as (hyperemic diameter - baseline diameter)/baseline diameter × 100.
Baseline
Brachial Artery Flow-mediated Dilation (FMD) After Fresh Red Blood Cells (RBCs) Transfusions vs. Storage-aged Red Blood Cells (saRBCs) Transfusions at 24 Hours After Transfusion
Time Frame: 24 hours after transfusion
Ultrasonography of the brachial artery performed at the bedside using a high-resolution 10-megahertz (MHz) ultrasound transducer before and after suprasystolic inflation of a blood pressure cuff for 5 minutes in the ipsilateral upper arm. Brachial artery FMD was calculated as (hyperemic diameter -24 hour diameter)/24 hour diameter × 100.
24 hours after transfusion

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

April 1, 2009

Primary Completion (Actual)

November 1, 2012

Study Completion (Actual)

October 1, 2013

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

October 29, 2014

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 30, 2014

First Posted (Estimate)

October 31, 2014

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

April 11, 2016

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 7, 2016

Last Verified

April 1, 2016

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • IRB00015316a

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Cardiovascular Diseases

Clinical Trials on Storage-aged red blood cells (saRBCs) units

Subscribe