Multicenter Trial Comparing One-step Partial Caries Removal to Complete Caries Removal for the Treatment of Deep Carious Lesions in Permanent Teeth. (DECAT : DEep CAries Treatment). (DECAT)
Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing One-step Partial Caries Removal to Complete Caries Removal for the Treatment of Deep Carious Lesions in Permanent Teeth DECAT DEep CAries Treatment
This clinical trial is a national multicenter randomized controlled trial performed in parallel groups aiming to validate a treatment that preserves pulp vitality of mature permanent posterior teeth through partial removal of carious tissue and restoring tooth structure using a simple filling in one session, thus delaying premature tooth aging.
Two successive randomizations will be performed (allocation ratio 1:1); firstly for the type of excavation carried out (partial vs. complete caries removal) and secondly for the nature of the adhesive used (antibacterial adhesive vs. non-antibacterial adhesive). The second randomization will not be carried out for teeth requiring endodontic treatment after the first randomization.
The study's primary objective will be to compare, at 1 year of follow-up, the efficacy (binary success criteria) of partial caries removal versus complete caries removal in occlusal or proximal deep lesions of mature permanent posterior teeth (bicuspids and molars except third molars). Secondary objectives will include the comparison, at 1 year of follow-up, of the efficacy (binary success criteria) of an antibacterial two-step self-etch adhesive versus a traditional non-antibacterial two-step self-etch adhesive. Another secondary objective will be to compare, at two and three years of follow-up, the efficacy of partial versus complete caries removal.
The primary outcome is the success of the caries removal protocol at one year, measured according to 5 FDI criteria, while the secondary outcome is the contribution of the functional and biological dimensions of the 5 FDI criteria items to determining success or failure of the treatment. The outcome of success will be the same for all objectives, primary and secondary.
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
- Procedure: A one-step partial caries removal procedure for the treatment of deep carious lesions in posterior permanent teeth.
- Procedure: A complete caries removal procedure for the treatment of deep carious lesions in posterior permanent teeth.
- Device: The application of an antibacterial dental adhesive (ClearfilTM SE Protect, Kuraray Dental).
- Device: The application of a conventional dental adhesive (ClearfilTM SE Bond, Kuraray Dental)
Study Type
Enrollment (Anticipated)
Phase
- Phase 3
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
-
Clermont Ferrand, France, 63003
- Recruiting
- Hopital Estaing
-
Contact:
- DOMEJEAN Sophie
- Phone Number: +33 6 63 04 71 43
- Email: sophie.domejean@udamail.fr
-
Principal Investigator:
- DOMEJEAN Sophie
-
Creteil, France, 94000
- Recruiting
- Hôpital Albert Chenevier
-
Contact:
- DURSUN Elisabeth
- Phone Number: +33 6 12 37 56 14
- Email: elisabeth.dursun@parisdescartes.fr
-
Principal Investigator:
- DURSUN Elisabeth
-
Sub-Investigator:
- LANDRU Marguerite-Marie
-
Grenay, France, 62160
- Recruiting
- Cabinet libéral
-
Contact:
- TRENTESAUX Thomas
- Phone Number: +33 676285205
- Email: thomas.trentesaux@univ-lille2.fr
-
Principal Investigator:
- TRENTESAUX Thomas
-
IVRY SUR SEINE Cedex, France, 94205
- Recruiting
- Hôpital Charles Foix
-
Contact:
- FRON-CHABOUIS Hélène
- Phone Number: +33 6 22 78 72 64
- Email: fronhelene@gmail.com
-
Principal Investigator:
- FRON-CHABOUIS Hélène
-
Sub-Investigator:
- DECUP Franck
-
Sub-Investigator:
- ATTAL Jean-Pierre
-
Sub-Investigator:
- CHATELAIN Claire
-
Lille, France
- Recruiting
- Chu Lille
-
Contact:
- LINEZ Marc
- Phone Number: +33 6 42 53 80 79
- Email: marc.linez@univ-lille2.fr
-
Principal Investigator:
- LINEZ Marc
-
Sub-Investigator:
- GAMBIEZ Alain
-
Sub-Investigator:
- HILDELBERT Pierre
-
Sub-Investigator:
- BECAVIN Thibault
-
Sub-Investigator:
- ROBBERECHT Lieven
-
Sub-Investigator:
- TRENTESAUX Thomas
-
Sub-Investigator:
- CATTEAU Céline
-
Lyon, France, 69007
- Recruiting
- Service de consultations et traitements dentaires
-
Contact:
- VILLAT Cyril
- Phone Number: +33 6 09 98 64 32
- Email: cyril.villat@univ-lyon1.fr
-
Principal Investigator:
- VILLAT Cyril
-
Sub-Investigator:
- LUCCHINI Marion
-
Sub-Investigator:
- GASQUI Marie-Agnès
-
Sub-Investigator:
- MORRIER Jean-Jacques
-
Sub-Investigator:
- SELLI Thierry
-
Sub-Investigator:
- THIVICHON-PRINCE Beatrice
-
Principal Investigator:
- GROSGOGEAT Brigitte
-
Marseille, France, 13385
- Recruiting
- Hopital de la Timone
-
Contact:
- RASKIN Anne
- Phone Number: +33 4 91 38 59 55
- Email: anne.raskin@ap-hm.fr
-
Sub-Investigator:
- TASSERY Hervé
-
Sub-Investigator:
- JACQUOT Bruno
-
Principal Investigator:
- RASKIN Anne
-
Nantes, France, 44093
- Recruiting
- CHRU de Nantes
-
Contact:
- WEISS Pierre
- Phone Number: +33 6 87 74 10 55
- Email: pierre.weiss@univ-nantes.fr
-
Principal Investigator:
- WEISS Pierre
-
Sub-Investigator:
- LOPEZ-CAZAUX Serena
-
Sub-Investigator:
- ENKEL Bénédicte
-
Sub-Investigator:
- PRUD'HOMME Tony
-
Nice, France, 06003
- Recruiting
- CHU Nice
-
Contact:
- BRULAT Nathalie
- Phone Number: +33 6 95 37 73 59
- Email: nathalie.brulat@unice.fr
-
Principal Investigator:
- BRULAT Nathalie
-
Sub-Investigator:
- MULLER BOLLA Michèle
-
PARIS Cedex 12, France, 75571
- Recruiting
- APAH Rothschild- Garancière
-
Contact:
- PLASSE-PRADELLE Nelly
- Phone Number: +33 6 10 33 28 02
- Email: nx.pradelle@club-internet.fr
-
Principal Investigator:
- PLASSE-PRADELLE Nelly
-
Sub-Investigator:
- HARTMANN Aline
-
Sub-Investigator:
- MESGOUEZ-MENEZ Catherine
-
Paris, France, 75013
- Recruiting
- Groupe Hospitalier Pitié Salpêtrière
-
Contact:
- BOSCO Julia
- Phone Number: +33 6 60 76 94 90
- Email: julia.bosco@univ-paris-diderot.fr
-
Principal Investigator:
- BOSCO Julia
-
Sub-Investigator:
- HOUARI Sophia
-
Paris, France, 75017
- Recruiting
- Cabinet libéral
-
Contact:
- DECUP Franck
- Phone Number: +33 607126524
- Email: franck.decup@orange.fr
-
Principal Investigator:
- DECUP Franck
-
Pessac, France, 33604
- Recruiting
- Hopital Xavier Arnozan
-
Contact:
- Dominique ORIEZ-PONS
- Phone Number: +33 679164583
- Email: dominique.oriez-pons@u-bordeaux.fr
-
Sub-Investigator:
- BARSBY Terence
-
Sub-Investigator:
- KEROUREDAN Olivia
-
Sub-Investigator:
- AUSSEL Audrey
-
Principal Investigator:
- ORIEZ-PONS Dominique
-
Rennes, France, 35033
- Recruiting
- CHRU Rennes
-
Contact:
- TURPIN Yann-Loïg
- Phone Number: +33 6 74 69 53 96
- Email: yturpin@univ-rennes1.fr
-
Principal Investigator:
- TURPIN Yann-Loïg
-
Sub-Investigator:
- PERARD Matthieu
-
Toulouse, France, 31059
- Recruiting
- CHRU Toulouse
-
Contact:
- JONIOT Sabine
- Phone Number: +33 6 77 38 99 20
- Email: s.joniot@free.fr
-
Principal Investigator:
- JONIOT Sabine
-
Sub-Investigator:
- GEORGELIN-GURGEL Marie
-
Sub-Investigator:
- VAYSSE Fréderic
-
Sub-Investigator:
- DIEMER Franck
-
Sub-Investigator:
- BONIN Bertrand
-
Sub-Investigator:
- MONSARRAT Paul
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
Randomization n°1 - Partial versus complete caries removal
Patient-related criteria:
- Patient consulting in one of the multicenter trial centers
- Male and female aged 8-80 (inclusive),
- Affiliated to a social security regimen
- Able to tolerate necessary restorative procedures
- Provide informed consent
- Accepts the three-year follow-up period
Tooth related criteria:
- Mature permanent posterior tooth
- Tooth with vital pulp according to pulp-sensitivity tests
- Tooth with a deep (primary or secondary) at least proximal and/or occlusal carious lesion presenting a residual dentin thickness with no continuity between the carious cavity and the pulp chamber.
- In case of proximal lesions, the proximal cervical limit must allow proper placement of a waterproof dental dam (confirmed by a bitewing X-ray radiograph)
- Tooth requiring a direct partial restorative treatment.
Randomization n°2 - Antibacterial vs. non antibacterial adhesive application
Tooth has been assigned a treatment by randomization n°1.
Exclusion Criteria:
Randomization n°1 - Partial versus complete caries removal
Patient-related criteria:
- Person under guardianship, pregnant or nursing woman,
- Risk of infectious endocarditis,
- Patient who has an implanted Cardiac Pacemaker/Defibrillator
- Patient with severe periodontal disease (pocket depth ≥5mm and/or mobility type IV),
- Poor oral hygiene (abundance of soft matter within the gingival pocket and/or on the tooth and gingival margin = score 3 [Silness and Loe, 1964],
- Allergy to any of the materials and/or anaesthetic used,
- Uncooperative patients.
Tooth related criteria:
- Nocturnal pain causing insomnia,
- Tooth suffering dentin hypersensitivity (sharp sudden pain of short duration pain arising from exposed dentin (erosion and/or gingival recession), typically in response to external stimuli (air blast hypersensitivity [Schiff et al., 1994], tactile hypersensitivity),
- Sensitivity to axial or lateral percussion;
- Radiolucent apical image,
- Condensing osteitis,
- Tooth having an external or internal resorption,
- Tooth having suffered trauma,
- Tooth with a carious cervical lesion,
- Tooth with an occlusal wear associated to a dentine exposure,
- Tooth supporting clasp of a removable partial denture (RPD).
- Tooth with defects of mineralization that once the treated tooth could come into contact of the carried out restoration
Randomization n°2 - Antibacterial vs. non antibacterial adhesive application
- Tooth with pulp exposure after randomization n°1 requiring endodontic treatment (pulp exposure > 2 mm² and/or haemostasis not obtained).
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Double
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Partial excavation
patients receiving after excavation (in case of absence of pulp exposure after excavation necessitating endodontic treatment) antibacterial adhesive or non-antibacterial adhesive
|
Instruments and procedures:
Hand instruments will be used for final excavation following clinical criteria guidelines (color of residual dentin and probe resistance) and taking in to consideration the color data obtained by the Soprolife® camera. The operator will stop excavating when the dentin close to the pulp appears red (for infected dentin). Instruments and procedures: Idem partial excavation arm. In the complete excavation arm, the operator will stop excavating when the dentin close to the pulp appears green (for healthy dentin tissue) using the Soprolife® camera, leaving no infected or affected dentin.
Device: The application of an antibacterial dental adhesive (ClearfilTM SE Protect, Kuraray Dental).
Enamel and dentin will be conditioned according to the manufacturer's instructions. Both antibacterial and conventional adhesives are two-steps bonding systems. The first step consists of the application of a primer to the enamel and dentin for 20 seconds (which allows the completion of etching and priming procedures). The second step consists of the application of the antibacterial adhesive and its light curing for 10 seconds.
Idem antibacterial dental adhesive arm.
A conventional dental adhesive will be used instead of an antibacterial.
|
|
Active Comparator: Complete excavation
patients receiving after excavation (in case of absence of pulp exposure after excavation necessitating endodontic treatment) antibacterial adhesive or non-antibacterial adhesive
|
Instruments and procedures:
Hand instruments will be used for final excavation following clinical criteria guidelines (color of residual dentin and probe resistance) and taking in to consideration the color data obtained by the Soprolife® camera. The operator will stop excavating when the dentin close to the pulp appears red (for infected dentin). Instruments and procedures: Idem partial excavation arm. In the complete excavation arm, the operator will stop excavating when the dentin close to the pulp appears green (for healthy dentin tissue) using the Soprolife® camera, leaving no infected or affected dentin.
Device: The application of an antibacterial dental adhesive (ClearfilTM SE Protect, Kuraray Dental).
Enamel and dentin will be conditioned according to the manufacturer's instructions. Both antibacterial and conventional adhesives are two-steps bonding systems. The first step consists of the application of a primer to the enamel and dentin for 20 seconds (which allows the completion of etching and priming procedures). The second step consists of the application of the antibacterial adhesive and its light curing for 10 seconds.
Idem antibacterial dental adhesive arm.
A conventional dental adhesive will be used instead of an antibacterial.
|
|
Experimental: Antibacterial dental adhesive
patients with prior partial or complete caries removal (excepted patients with a pulp exposure after excavation necessitating endodontic treatment)
|
Instruments and procedures:
Hand instruments will be used for final excavation following clinical criteria guidelines (color of residual dentin and probe resistance) and taking in to consideration the color data obtained by the Soprolife® camera. The operator will stop excavating when the dentin close to the pulp appears red (for infected dentin). Instruments and procedures: Idem partial excavation arm. In the complete excavation arm, the operator will stop excavating when the dentin close to the pulp appears green (for healthy dentin tissue) using the Soprolife® camera, leaving no infected or affected dentin.
Device: The application of an antibacterial dental adhesive (ClearfilTM SE Protect, Kuraray Dental).
Enamel and dentin will be conditioned according to the manufacturer's instructions. Both antibacterial and conventional adhesives are two-steps bonding systems. The first step consists of the application of a primer to the enamel and dentin for 20 seconds (which allows the completion of etching and priming procedures). The second step consists of the application of the antibacterial adhesive and its light curing for 10 seconds.
Idem antibacterial dental adhesive arm.
A conventional dental adhesive will be used instead of an antibacterial.
|
|
Active Comparator: Conventional dental adhesive
patients with prior partial or complete caries removal (excepted patients with a pulp exposure after excavation necessitating endodontic treatment)
|
Instruments and procedures:
Hand instruments will be used for final excavation following clinical criteria guidelines (color of residual dentin and probe resistance) and taking in to consideration the color data obtained by the Soprolife® camera. The operator will stop excavating when the dentin close to the pulp appears red (for infected dentin). Instruments and procedures: Idem partial excavation arm. In the complete excavation arm, the operator will stop excavating when the dentin close to the pulp appears green (for healthy dentin tissue) using the Soprolife® camera, leaving no infected or affected dentin.
Device: The application of an antibacterial dental adhesive (ClearfilTM SE Protect, Kuraray Dental).
Enamel and dentin will be conditioned according to the manufacturer's instructions. Both antibacterial and conventional adhesives are two-steps bonding systems. The first step consists of the application of a primer to the enamel and dentin for 20 seconds (which allows the completion of etching and priming procedures). The second step consists of the application of the antibacterial adhesive and its light curing for 10 seconds.
Idem antibacterial dental adhesive arm.
A conventional dental adhesive will be used instead of an antibacterial.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Probability of success in arm P (Partial Caries Removal) compared to arm C (Complete Caries Removal) using a composite criteria of success summarized as a binary success criteria (cf. description below)
Time Frame: one year of follow-up.
|
Cases will be considered as successful if each of the 5 following criteria described by the World Dental Federation (FDI) present a score of 3 or less:
Considering a score of 4 or 5 as failure means that a re-intervention on the tooth (score 4) would be considered as a failure in the context of this study. Adverse events will be recorded and reported as general safety outcomes. |
one year of follow-up.
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Contribution of the functional and biological dimensions of the five FDI criteria items
Time Frame: At one year of follow-up.
|
Assessment of the relative importance of each of the 5 FDI criteria in determining failure for both the primary outcome
|
At one year of follow-up.
|
|
Probability of success in arm P (Partial Caries Removal) compared to arm C (Complete Caries Removal) using a composite criteria of success summarized as a binary success criteria, at two and three years of follow-up.
Time Frame: At two and three years of follow-up.
|
same criteria as the primary outcome measure of efficacy (composite criteria summarized as a binary success criteria)
|
At two and three years of follow-up.
|
|
Probability of success after the use of an antibacterial adhesive compared to the use of a non-antibacterial adhesive using a composite criteria of success summarized as a binary success criteria, at one, two and three years of follow-up.
Time Frame: At one, two and three years of follow-up.
|
same criteria as the primary outcome measure of efficacy (composite criteria summarized as a binary success criteria)
|
At one, two and three years of follow-up.
|
|
Identification of predictive factors of clinical success from among the following list: presence of post-operative pain, age of patient, type of the carious lesion, location of the carious lesion (occlusal or proximal) and pulp exposure.
Time Frame: At one, two and three years of follow-up.
|
the dependent variable (clinical success) corresponds to the same criteria as the primary outcome measure of efficacy (composite criteria summarized as a binary success criteria)
|
At one, two and three years of follow-up.
|
|
Description of the Consequences of Failures per Treatment Arm
Time Frame: At one, two and three years of follow-up.
|
total number of visits, need for endodontic treatment, need for extraction
|
At one, two and three years of follow-up.
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Investigators
- Study Director: BRIGITTE GROSGOGEAT, Professor, Hospices Civils de Lyon
Publications and helpful links
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start
Primary Completion (Anticipated)
Study Completion (Anticipated)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Estimate)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Estimate)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- 2014-854
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Deep Caries
-
Hacettepe UniversityRecruitingDeep Caries | Dentin CariesTurkey
-
Cairo UniversityCompleted
-
Cairo UniversityCompleted
-
Cairo UniversityCompleted
-
Cairo UniversityCompleted
-
Minia UniversityRecruiting
-
Cairo UniversityRecruiting
-
Cairo UniversityNot yet recruiting
-
Universidad Rey Juan CarlosRecruiting