Prevention of Falls Among Older Adults in Community Settings

June 24, 2021 updated by: Oregon Research Institute

Comparative Effectiveness and Cost-effectiveness of a Fall Prevention Intervention: Tai Ji Quan: Moving for Better Balance

Objective: To conduct a comparative efficacy and cost-effectiveness study of an evidence-based fall prevention program-Tai Ji Quan: Moving for Better Balance (TJQMBB).

Study Overview

Detailed Description

To determine the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of the two evidence-based exercise programs (Multimodal Exercise,TJQMBB) relative to stretching, a proxy for a minimum practice standard, in reducing falls among older adults at risk of falling.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

670

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Oregon
      • Eugene, Oregon, United States, 97403
        • Oregon Research Institute

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

70 years and older (Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • aged 70 years or older living independently in the community
  • at least one fall in the preceding 12 months and a referral from a healthcare provider indicating the participant is at risk of falls due to gait/balance impairment or medication use or impaired mobility as evidenced by Timed Up and Go result of >13.5 seconds
  • no participation in daily and/or structured vigorous physical activity or walking for exercise that lasted 15 minutes or longer at a time or muscle-strengthening activities on 2 or more days a week in the previous 3 months
  • walking independently, with or without the use of an assistive device,
  • no severe cognitive impairment (Mini-Mental State Examination score ≥20)
  • able to exercise safely as determined by their healthcare provider,
  • a willingness to be randomly assigned to an intervention condition and complete the 6-month intervention and 6 month follow-up.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • any medical or physical conditions deemed unacceptable by their physician or healthcare provider,
  • planned to leave the study area within the next 12 months.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Prevention
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Tai Ji Quan: Moving for Better Balance
This protocol involves training 2 times a week for 6 months.
The protocol involves a core 8-form routine training with built-in variations and a subroutine of integrated therapeutic movements.
Active Comparator: Multimodal Exercise
This protocol involves training 2 times a week for 6 months.
The protocol involves a multi-modality program that involves aerobic, strength, balance, and flexibility exercises.
Sham Comparator: Stretching
This protocol involves participation of 2 times a week for 6 months.
The protocol represents a minimum standard of practice for exercises for older adults with activities consisting primarily of seated exercises accompanied by breathing, stretching, and relaxation.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in the number of falls
Time Frame: Baseline, 6 Months
Using a daily diary "fall calendar," falls reported by participants across the 24-week surveillance period will be collected, starting from the date of first intervention class and continuing until participants withdrew, had died or were lost to follow-up.
Baseline, 6 Months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Functional Reach
Time Frame: Baseline, 6 Months
assessing the maximal distance (in inch) participants one can reach forward, beyond arm's length, while maintaining a fixed based of support in the standing position. Differences between baseline and 6 months scores will be calculated to assess change.
Baseline, 6 Months
Instrumented Timed Up and Go
Time Frame: Baseline, 6 Months
assessing the time to complete a series of functional tasks (sit-to-stand, 180 degree turn, turn-to-sit.) while walking through a 7-meter walkway (7 meters towards a line, turn, and 7 meters towards the chair). The measure is assessed in second. Differences between baseline and 6 months scores will be calculated to assess change.
Baseline, 6 Months
Physical Performance
Time Frame: Baseline, 6 Months
The physical performance measure consists of 4-meter walk at usual pace, a timed repeated chair stand, and 3 increasingly difficult standing balance tests. Each measure is assigned a categorical score ranging from 0 (inability to complete the test) to 4 (best performance). A summary score ranging from 0 (worst performance) to 12 (best performances) will be calculated by summing the 3 components scores.
Baseline, 6 Months
Cognitive function
Time Frame: Baseline, 6 Months
Montreal Cognitive Assessment (in points). Differences between baseline and 6 months scores will be calculated to assess change.
Baseline, 6 Months
Cost per fall prevented
Time Frame: Baseline, 6 Months
determined by calculating total intervention cost estimates divided by number of falls observed during the 6 month intervention.
Baseline, 6 Months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

November 1, 2014

Primary Completion (Actual)

December 31, 2018

Study Completion (Actual)

March 30, 2021

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

October 28, 2014

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 6, 2014

First Posted (Estimate)

November 11, 2014

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

June 28, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 24, 2021

Last Verified

June 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 1R01AG045094-01A1 (U.S. NIH Grant/Contract)

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Fall

Clinical Trials on Tai Ji Quan: Moving for Better Balance

3
Subscribe