PV-10 vs Chemotherapy or Oncolytic Viral Therapy for Treatment of Locally Advanced Cutaneous Melanoma

January 17, 2022 updated by: Provectus Biopharmaceuticals, Inc.

PV-10 Intralesional Injection vs Systemic Chemotherapy or Oncolytic Viral Therapy for Treatment of Locally Advanced Cutaneous Melanoma

This is an international multicenter, open-label, randomized controlled trial (RCT) of single-agent intralesional PV-10 versus systemic chemotherapy or intralesional oncolytic viral therapy to assess treatment of locally advanced cutaneous melanoma in patients who (1) are not candidates for targeted therapy and (2) are not candidates for an immune checkpoint inhibitor. Subjects in the comparator arm will receive the Investigator's choice of dacarbazine (DTIC), temozolomide (TMZ) or intralesional talimogene laherparepvec as determined by Investigator preference and standard of care in the Investigator's country or region. Effectiveness will be assessed by comparison of progression-free survival (PFS) between all intent-to-treat (ITT) subjects in the two study treatment arms.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Subjects will be randomized using a 2:1 treatment allocation (i.e. two-thirds of the subjects will receive PV-10).

Subjects in the comparator arm who have completed at least 1 cycle of study treatment and who meet the study protocol definition of disease progression but do not have evidence of visceral metastases will be eligible to enter the crossover portion of the study and receive PV-10. Subjects crossing over must meet all study inclusion and exclusion criteria for clinical laboratories, thyroid function, concurrent or intercurrent illness and pregnancy at the time of crossover.

Assessment of progression will be performed by an Independent Review Committee (IRC) based on Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) ver. 1.1 criteria. Events signaling progression include increase in size and/or number of lesions, distant or nodal disease progression, or death. All secondary endpoints involving disease response and progression will be based on the IRC determination.

An interim assessment of efficacy and safety will be performed by the IRC when 50% of the events required for the primary endpoint have occurred.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

20

Phase

  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Nantes, France
        • Unité Cancéro-Dermatologie, Hôtel-Dieu CHU Nantes
      • Toulouse, France, 31059
        • Institut Claudius Regaud, IUCT Oncopole
      • Berlin, Germany
        • Klinik für Dermatologie, Venerologie und Allergologie Charite Universitätsmedizin Berlin
      • Essen, Germany
        • Klinik für Dermatologie Universitätsklinikum Essen Studienzentrum
      • Kiel, Germany
        • Klinik für Dermatologie, Venerologie und Allergologie Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein Hautkrebszentrum
      • Mainz, Germany
        • Hautklinik Klinikum der Johannes Gutenberg Universität Hautkrebszentrum
      • Napoli, Italy
        • IRCCS Instituto Nazionale Tumori "Fondazione Giovanni Pascale"
      • Rome, Italy
        • Istituto Dermopatico dell'Immacolata (IDI IRCCS)
      • Siena, Italy
        • Azienda Sanitaria Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Senese
    • Oaxaca
      • Juchitán de Zaragoza, Oaxaca, Mexico, 70000
        • Centro de Estudios y Prevencion del Cancer A.C.
    • Sinaloa
      • Culiacán, Sinaloa, Mexico, 80020
        • Neurociencias Estudios Clinicos S.C.
    • California
      • San Diego, California, United States, 92123
        • Sharp Memorial Hospital - Clinical Oncology Research
    • Florida
      • Miami Beach, Florida, United States, 33140
        • Mount Sinai Comprehensive Cancer Center
      • Tampa, Florida, United States, 33612
        • Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute
    • Missouri
      • Saint Louis, Missouri, United States, 63110
        • Washington University School of Medicine - Dermatology
    • New Hampshire
      • Lebanon, New Hampshire, United States, 03756
        • Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center
    • New Jersey
      • Morristown, New Jersey, United States, 07960
        • Atlantic Health System
    • North Carolina
      • Winston-Salem, North Carolina, United States, 27157
        • Wake Forest Baptist Health
    • Oklahoma
      • Tulsa, Oklahoma, United States, 74146
        • Oklahoma Cancer Specialists and Research Institute
    • Pennsylvania
      • Easton, Pennsylvania, United States, 18045
        • St Luke's University Hospital and Health Network
      • Hershey, Pennsylvania, United States, 17033
        • Penn State Hershey Cancer Institute
    • Texas
      • Houston, Texas, United States, 77030
        • M.D. Anderson Cancer Center
    • Utah
      • Salt Lake City, Utah, United States, 84112
        • Huntsman Cancer Institute

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Age 18 years or older, male or female
  2. Histologically or cytologically confirmed melanoma
  3. Recurrent, satellite or in-transit locally advanced cutaneous or subcutaneous melanoma metastases (i.e., American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) Stage IIIB, IIIC or Stage IV M1a with no active nodal metastases)
  4. At least 1 measurable Target Lesion that can be accurately measured by calipers or computed tomography (CT) consisting of:

    • at least one cutaneous lesion (each lesion ≥ 10 mm in longest diameter or up to 5 lesions having a sum of longest diameters ≥ 10 mm); and/or
    • at least one subcutaneous lesion (each lesion ≥ 10 mm in longest diameter by CT);
    • where Target Lesions should be at least 10 mm from any other lesion
  5. No lesion > 50 mm in longest diameter; and no more than 50 lesions
  6. Calculated required PV-10 dose ≤ 15 mL (based on total tumor burden)
  7. Performance Status: Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) 0-2
  8. Not a candidate for treatment with an immune checkpoint inhibitor (e.g., failed or did not tolerate prior therapy, or due to co-morbidities, pre-existing autoimmune disease, drug unavailability or standard of care)
  9. Not a candidate for targeted therapy with BRAF or combined BRAF/MEK inhibitors (e.g., failed or did not tolerate prior therapy, BRAF V600 wild-type or due to drug unavailability or standard of care)
  10. Clinical Laboratories:

    • Absolute neutrophil count (ANC) ≥ 1.5 x 10^9/L and platelet count ≥100 x 10^9/L
    • Creatinine ≤ 3 times the upper limit of normal (ULN)
    • Estimated creatinine clearance (CrCl) or estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) ≥ 30 mL/min/1.73 m2
    • Total bilirubin ≤ 3 times the upper limit of normal (ULN)
    • Aspartate transaminase (AST), alanine transaminase (ALT) and alkaline phosphatase (ALP) ≤ 5 times the upper limit of normal (ULN)
    • Lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) ≤ 2 times the upper limit of normal (ULN).
  11. Thyroid function abnormality ≤ Grade 2
  12. Candidate for at least one comparator drug:

    • Subjects must be candidates for at least one of the designated comparator drugs

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Presence or history of visceral melanoma metastasis
  2. Presence of active nodal metastases (e.g., radiologic or clinical evidence of current nodal disease)
  3. Presence of more than 50 melanoma lesions
  4. Radiation therapy to any Study Lesion within 6 weeks of initial study treatment.
  5. Chemotherapy or other systemic cancer therapy within 4 weeks of initial study treatment (6 weeks for nitrosoureas or mitomycin), or regional chemotherapy (limb infusion or perfusion) within 12 weeks of initial study treatment
  6. Immunotherapy for cancer within 4 weeks of initial study treatment
  7. Local treatment (e.g., surgery, cryotherapy, laser ablation) to any Study Lesion within 4 weeks of initial study treatment
  8. Anti-tumor vaccine therapy within 6 weeks of initial study treatment.
  9. Investigational agents within 4 weeks of initial study treatment.
  10. Concurrent or Intercurrent Illness:

    • Impaired wound healing or other extremity complications due to diabetes mellitus in subjects whose Study Lesions are located in an extremity
    • Severe peripheral vascular disease in subjects whose Study Lesions are located in an extremity
    • Significant concurrent or intercurrent illness, psychiatric disorders, or alcohol or chemical dependence that would, in the opinion of the Investigator, compromise the subject's safety or compliance or interfere with interpretation of study results.
    • Uncontrolled thyroid disease or cystic fibrosis
    • Clinically significant acute or unstable cardiovascular, cerebrovascular (stroke), renal, gastrointestinal, pulmonary, immunological, endocrine, or central nervous system disorders
  11. Pregnancy:

    • Female subjects who are pregnant or lactating
    • Female subjects who have positive serum pregnancy test taken within 14 days of study treatment
    • Female subjects of child-bearing potential who are unwilling to use highly effective contraception (e.g., combined (estrogen and progestogen containing) or progestogen-only hormonal contraceptives, intrauterine devices, bilateral tubal ligation, vasectomized partner, sexual abstinence or equivalent measures) for the duration of study treatment
  12. Contraindication for all comparators:

    • Subjects with contraindications to all of the designated comparator drugs

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: PV-10
Subjects will receive intralesional PV-10 to all Study Lesions on study Day 1. PV-10 should be re-administered at 28-day intervals until complete response, disease progression or study termination occurs.
Active Comparator: Chemotherapy or Oncolytic Viral Therapy
Subjects will receive (a) dacarbazine (intravenously at 850 m/m2) or temozolomide (orally at 200 mg/m2 daily for 5 consecutive days), administered at consecutive 28-day intervals, or (b) intralesional talimogene laherparepvec administered on an initial 21 interval followed by consecutive 14 day intervals, until complete response, disease progression or study termination occurs.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Progression-free Survival (PFS)
Time Frame: Assessed every 12 weeks until disease progression, withdrawal of consent, or study termination; progression detected between formal assessments was documented at the time of detection; median follow-up time for PFS was 26.6 weeks, maximum was 125.8 weeks.

PFS was estimated via Kaplan-Meier analysis using Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors (RECIST v1.1) criteria. Subjects who did not have an event of progression or death were censored at their last assessment date.

Assessment of progression was performed by the sponsor based on review of lesion measurement and clinical progression data reported by each investigator. Events signaling progression included increase in size and/or number of study lesions, onset of visceral metastatic disease, and death. For target lesions (assigned prior to randomization), complete response (CR) required disappearance of all target lesions; partial response (PR) required >= 30% decrease in sum of the longest diameter (SLD) of all target lesions; progressive disease (PD) required >=20% increase in SLD of target lesions. Non-target lesions were followed for CR, PD, or non-CR/non-PD status using equivalent thresholds. Progression occurred when PD was observed in either target or non-target lesion.

Assessed every 12 weeks until disease progression, withdrawal of consent, or study termination; progression detected between formal assessments was documented at the time of detection; median follow-up time for PFS was 26.6 weeks, maximum was 125.8 weeks.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Complete Response Rate (CRR)
Time Frame: Assessed every 12 weeks until disease progression, withdrawal of consent, or study termination; median follow-up time for CRR was 26.6 weeks, maximum was 125.8 weeks.
CRR was assessed using RECIST v1.1 criteria, and required disappearance of all target and non-target lesions.
Assessed every 12 weeks until disease progression, withdrawal of consent, or study termination; median follow-up time for CRR was 26.6 weeks, maximum was 125.8 weeks.
Duration of Complete Response (DCR)
Time Frame: Assessed every 12 weeks until disease progression, withdrawal of consent, or study termination; median follow-up time for DCR was 26.7 weeks, maximum was 77.7 weeks.
DCR was estimated via Kaplan-Meier analysis for participants achieving a complete response, and was defined as the interval from first complete response to disease progression or death; responders who did not have an event of progression or death were censored at their last assessment date. Complete response was assessed using RECIST v1.1 criteria, and required disappearance of all target and non-target lesions.
Assessed every 12 weeks until disease progression, withdrawal of consent, or study termination; median follow-up time for DCR was 26.7 weeks, maximum was 77.7 weeks.
Overall Survival (OS)
Time Frame: Assessed every 12 weeks upon withdrawal from active study participation until death, withdrawal of consent, or study termination; median follow-up time for survival was 82.4 weeks, maximum was 167.0 weeks.
OS was documented at 12 week intervals commencing on withdrawal from active study participation. Documentation was made by subject clinic visit or other personal contact, telephonic contact, review of medical records, or other unequivocal evidence of survival status. OS was estimated via Kaplan-Meier analysis, and was defined as the interval from randomization to death; subjects who did not have an event of death were censored at their last assessment date.
Assessed every 12 weeks upon withdrawal from active study participation until death, withdrawal of consent, or study termination; median follow-up time for survival was 82.4 weeks, maximum was 167.0 weeks.
Number of Participants With Adverse Events
Time Frame: Assessed every 4 weeks until 28 days after last treatment; median duration of treatment was 11.8 and 9.5 weeks in each treatment group, respectively.
Safety and tolerability were assessed by monitoring the frequency, duration, severity and attribution of adverse events and evaluating changes in laboratory values and vital signs.
Assessed every 4 weeks until 28 days after last treatment; median duration of treatment was 11.8 and 9.5 weeks in each treatment group, respectively.

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in Domain Scores From Baseline Using the Patient Reported Skindex-16 Instrument
Time Frame: Assessed at baseline (Day 1 at start of study treatment) and at the end of each treatment cycle (every 4 or 6 weeks) until disease progression, withdrawal of consent, or study termination; median follow-up time was 26.6 weeks, maximum was 125.8 weeks.
In this exploratory endpoint, changes in Skindex-16 self-assessment scores were evaluated vs Day 1 baseline domain scores: symptom domain (items 1-4); emotional domain (items 5-11); and functioning domain (items 12-16). The Skindex-16 instrument solicits response to the extent of bother during the preceding week by 16 items (e.g., itching, hurting, worry, impact on daily activities), using a score from 0 (never bothered) to 6 (always bothered) for each item. Item scores are transformed to 0 to 100 scale, and domain scores are calculated as the average of the item scores comprising the domain. A lower domain score at baseline signifies lower impact of that domain; a decrease in domain score from baseline signifies improvement in that domain. Median baseline score and change from baseline over the study interval is presented for each domain.
Assessed at baseline (Day 1 at start of study treatment) and at the end of each treatment cycle (every 4 or 6 weeks) until disease progression, withdrawal of consent, or study termination; median follow-up time was 26.6 weeks, maximum was 125.8 weeks.

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Sanjiv Agarwala, M.D., St Luke's University Hospital and Health Network

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

April 1, 2015

Primary Completion (Actual)

April 1, 2019

Study Completion (Actual)

September 1, 2019

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 4, 2014

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 7, 2014

First Posted (Estimate)

November 11, 2014

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

January 19, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 17, 2022

Last Verified

January 1, 2022

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Cutaneous Melanoma

Clinical Trials on PV-10 (10% rose bengal disodium)

Subscribe