Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation on Nervous System in Patients With Hypertension.

November 14, 2014 updated by: Rodrigo Della Méa Plentz, Federal University of Health Science of Porto Alegre

Effects of Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation on Sympathetic and Parasympathetic Nervous System in Patients With Hypertension: a Randomized Clinical Trial

Hypertension has high prevalence and poor control rates and is considered one of the major modifiable risk factors for cardiovascular system diseases, and one of the most important public health problems. The imbalance of the autonomic cardiovascular control, which can be considered as a major etiologic factor in the development of essential hypertension is characterized by increased sympathetic activity and reduced parasympathetic activity possible.

Cardiovascular disease is the leading cause of death and disability in the world and autonomic imbalance is associated with several pathological conditions, and may be a final common pathway for the increased morbidity and mortality of cardiovascular diseases. In this sense, the heart rate variability (HRV) is a quantitative marker of sympathetic and parasympathetic activity, which can be used to assess disease and mortality as a noninvasive technique.

TENS is a noninvasive therapeutic modality, easy to handle, it has no side effects or interactions with medications being used for the relief of pain by sensory stimulation through peripheral nerves and mainly for control and treatment of acute and chronic pain . Research on the effect of TENS on the sympathetic and parasympathetic nervous system activity remain controversial, especially regarding the parameters to use.

The aim of this study is to investigate the effects of TENS on the sympathetic and parasympathetic nervous system in patients with hypertension by heart rate variability and blood pressure variability.

This is a randomized clinical trial, double blind, where hypertensive patients were randomized to three groups: high-frequency TENS (100 Hz) n = 20, low frequency TENS (4 Hz) n = 20 and n = 20 placebo. Evaluations will be made in a single session. The results will be assessed by a blinded investigator and randomization will be done electronically.

It is expected to evaluate how often TENS exerts more influence in the modulation of sympathetic and parasympathetic system.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Data collection was performed at the Laboratory of Clinical Investigation (LIC) Institute of Cardiology. Initially, patients rested for 30 minutes, and during this period has been completed the evaluation form with the identification data and questions about the patient's clinical status, such as checking blood pressure, weight and height.

Patients were randomized to group of high frequency (100 Hz / 200μs), low frequency (4 Hz / 200μs) or placebo. The placebo group received an active current for 30 seconds, and then gradually decreased for 15 seconds to not pass any current. This approach aims at masking the investigator and subject (RAKEL et al., 2010). Eligible subjects were randomly assigned in blocks, by electronic randomization (www.randomization.com).

The adhesive electrodes were used, size 9x5 cm, placed in bilateral paravertebral region of the T1 segment of the thoracic spine at L2 lumbar spine. Before the application of TENS (IBRAMED®), the skin was cleaned in place of the current application with alcohol to avoid any barrier conduction of electrical current.

The sessions took place at the same time of the day, throughout the protocol, the participants were comfortably accommodated in an acclimatized room (23ºC) in a supine position, head elevation of 30º with knees resting on a wedge. All the participants were forbidden to perform exhaustive exercises and intake caffeine at least two hours before the intervention and instructed to have a meal before the assessment.

TENS was applied for thirty minutes, with the frequency defined according to randomization. The intensity of the current was delivered at sensory-level intensity, adjusted every 5 minutes by the sensory threshold, during the 30 minutes as tolerated by each subject, but without motor contraction or pain reported by the subject.

The analysis of autonomic control was performed by means of a sensor placed on the middle finger, and connected to the Finapres (Ohmeda 2300, Colorado, USA) by recording beat to beat. Then, the conversion signal was performed using the powerlab (LAB chart). The analysis will be performed using the software Kubios.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

60

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Rio Grande do Sul
      • Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil, 90050170
        • Recruiting
        • Rodrigo Della Méa Plentz
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 80 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

Previous Hypertension diagnosis, systolic blood pressure (SBP) > 140 mm Hg and/or diastolic blood pressure (DBP) >90 mm Hg and clinical stability with no change in medications for at least 2 months preceding the study.

Exclusion Criteria:

Presence of any comorbidity such as diabetes; congestive heart failure; unstable angina; myocardial infarction; acute inflammation; peripheral vascular disease; associated neurological disease; acute respiratory illness; infectious disease or fever; cardiac pacemaker; unstable ventricular arrhythmia; active smokers; obesity; musculoskeletal disease in the lower limbs; changes in the electrocardiogram; smoker; treatment with beta blockers, steroids, hormones or chemotherapy or change in drug therapy were excluded from the study.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: TENS High Frequency 100 Hz
TENS was applied for thirty minutes, with the frequency defined according to randomization. The intensity of the current was delivered at sensory-level intensity, adjusted every 5 minutes by the sensory threshold, during the 30 minutes as tolerated by each subject, but without motor contraction or pain reported by the subject.
TENS high frequency (100 Hz / 200μs) was applied in bilateral paravertebral region of the T1 segment of the thoracic spine at L2 lumbar spine. The intensity of the current was delivered at sensory-level intensity, adjusted every 5 minutes by the sensory threshold, during the 30 minutes as tolerated by each subject, but without motor contraction or pain reported by the subject.
Active Comparator: TENS Low Frequency 4 Hz
TENS was applied for thirty minutes, with the frequency defined according to randomization. The intensity of the current was delivered at sensory-level intensity, adjusted every 5 minutes by the sensory threshold, during the 30 minutes as tolerated by each subject, but without motor contraction or pain reported by the subject.
TENS low frequency (4 Hz / 200μs) was applied in bilateral paravertebral region of the T1 segment of the thoracic spine at L2 lumbar spine. The intensity of the current was delivered at sensory-level intensity, adjusted every 5 minutes by the sensory threshold, during the 30 minutes as tolerated by each subject, but without motor contraction or pain reported by the subject.
Placebo Comparator: TENS Placebo
The placebo group received an active current for 30 seconds, and then gradually decreased for 15 seconds to not pass any current. This approach aims at masking the investigator and subject (RAKEL et al., 2010).
TENS was applied in bilateral paravertebral region of the T1 segment of the thoracic spine at L2 lumbar spine. The placebo group received an active current for 30 seconds, and then gradually decreased for 15 seconds to not pass any current. This approach aims at masking the investigator and subject (RAKEL et al., 2010).

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Heart Rate Variability
Time Frame: 2 Hours
For the analysis of heart rate variability (HRV), the time of RR intervals obtained from continuous ECG signal recorded by Finapres device (Ohmeda 2300, Colorado, USA) series. The time series of RR will be analyzed in the time and frequency and variability parameters and autonomic balance will be obtained. In the time domain we calculate the mean values of RR intervals, standard deviation and the square root of the sum of the square of successive differences (rMSSD). The acquisition of electrocardiogram signal (ECG) was performed immediately before and after the interventions for a 10-minute period, with the subject at rest.
2 Hours

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Rodrigo DM Plentz, PhD, Federal University of Health Science of Porto Alegre

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

August 1, 2014

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

January 1, 2015

Study Completion (Anticipated)

August 1, 2015

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 12, 2014

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 14, 2014

First Posted (Estimate)

November 17, 2014

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

November 17, 2014

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 14, 2014

Last Verified

November 1, 2014

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • HYPERTENSIONTENS

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Cardiovascular Diseases

Clinical Trials on TENS High Frequency

Subscribe