Phase 2 Trial to Evaluate Safety and Efficacy of Setmelanotide (RM-493) in Obese Participants With Prader-Willi Syndrome

July 6, 2023 updated by: Rhythm Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

A Phase 2, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-controlled Pilot Study to Assess the Effects of RM-493, a Melanocortin 4 Receptor (MC4R) Agonist, in Obese Subjects With Prader-Willi Syndrome (PWS) on Safety, Weight Reduction, and Food-Related Behaviors

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effects of a once daily subcutaneous injectable formulation of setmelanotide in obese participants with Prader-Willi syndrome on tolerability, weight loss, and hyperphagia-related behavior. The study drug (setmelanotide and placebo) was administered in a blinded fashion.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Intervention / Treatment

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

40

Phase

  • Phase 2

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • California
      • Irvine, California, United States, 92617
        • University of California Irvine
    • Florida
      • Gainesville, Florida, United States, 32610
        • University of Florida
    • Kansas
      • Kansas City, Kansas, United States, 66160
        • Kansas University Medical Center
    • New York
      • Mineola, New York, United States, 11501
        • Winthrop University Hospital
    • Tennessee
      • Nashville, Tennessee, United States, 37203
        • Vanderbilt University

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

16 years to 65 years (Child, Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. PWS due to chromosome 15 micro-deletion, maternal uniparental disomy, or imprinting defect, confirmed by fluorescent in situ hybridization, chromosomal microarray, and/or methylation studies. Obese male or female participants weighing at least 50 kilograms (kg) with body mass index (BMI) ≥ 27 kilogram per square meter (kg/m²)
  2. Age 16-65 years
  3. If a participant has diagnosis of type 2 diabetes, following criteria must be met:

    1. hemoglobin A1C (HbA1c) < 7.5% not being managed with insulin. Participants taking glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) analogues (exenatide or liraglutide) must have been on stable dose for greater than 3 months.
    2. Fasting plasma glucose < 140 milligrams per deciliter (mg/dL)
    3. No history of ketoacidosis or hyperosmolar coma
  4. Vital signs must be within the following ranges and stable.

    1. Systolic blood pressure, 90-150 millimeter of mercury (mm Hg)
    2. Diastolic blood pressure, 50-90 mm Hg
    3. Pulse rate, 40-100 beats per minute (bpm)
  5. Stable body weight at home for approximately 2 months (self or guardian-reported loss/gain within ± 5%).
  6. Blood pressure (≤ 150/90 mmHg); may include stable dose (≥ 30 days of use) of up to two anti-hypertensive medications that are intended to remain on a stable dose during the protocol
  7. Parent or guardian is able to communicate well with the investigator, to understand and comply with the requirements of the study, and be able to understand and sign the written informed consent. Due to the significant intellectual disability with PWS, assent is to be provided by the participant who cannot consent for himself or herself.
  8. Results of screening clinical laboratory tests (complete blood count with differential and platelets and chemistry profile) must be within normal range or, if outside of the normal range, must be accepted by the investigator and sponsor as not clinically significant.
  9. Females of non-childbearing potential, defined as surgically sterile (status post hysterectomy, bilateral oophorectomy, or bilateral tubal ligation) or post-menopausal for at least 12 months (and confirmed with a screening follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) level in the post-menopausal lab range), do not require contraception during the study. All other females of child-bearing potential must agree to use contraception as outlined in the protocol.
  10. Males with female partners of childbearing potential must agree to a double barrier method if they become sexually active during the study and for 90 days following the study. Male participants must not donate sperm for 90 days following their participation in the study.
  11. Participants must be on a stable dose of any allowed chronic concomitant medications while participating in the study.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Recent use (within 3 month) of weight loss agents including herbal medication.
  2. Diagnosis of schizophrenia, bipolar disorder, personality disorder or other Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Third Edition (DSM-III) disorders which the investigator believes will interfere significantly with study compliance.
  3. A Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) score of ≥ 15.
  4. Any suicidal ideation of type 4 or 5 on the Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS).
  5. Clinically significant illness in the 8 weeks before screening.
  6. History of clinically significant bleeding disorders.
  7. Current, clinically significant liver, renal, pulmonary, cardiac, oncologic, or gastrointestinal disease.
  8. Diagnosis of type 1 diabetes mellitus or other active endocrine disorders (e.g., Cushing syndrome, or thyroid dysfunction except if on adequate thyroid or glucocorticoid replacement supplement).
  9. Cardiovascular disease event including history of congestive heart failure, coronary artery disease, myocardial infarction, second degree or greater heart block or prolonged QT syndrome.
  10. Blood pressure > 150/90 mm Hg.
  11. Liver disease or liver injury as indicated by abnormal liver function tests, aspartate aminotransferase, alkaline phosphatase, or serum bilirubin (> 1.5 x upper limit of normal for any of these tests) or history of hepatic cirrhosis.
  12. History or presence of impaired renal function as indicated by clinically significantly abnormal creatinine, blood urea nitrogen, or urinary constituents (e.g., albuminuria) or moderate to severe renal dysfunction as defined by the Cockcroft-Gault equation (< 50 mL/min).
  13. History or close family history (parents or siblings) of melanoma.
  14. Oculocutaneous albinism (occurs at approximately 1% in PWS).
  15. Significant dermatologic findings as part of the Screening comprehensive skin evaluation performed by the dermatologist.
  16. Significant history of abuse of drugs or solvents in the year before screening or a positive Drugs of Abuse (DOA) test at screening.
  17. History of alcohol abuse in the past year before screening or currently drinks in excess of 21 units per week (3 servings or units/day).
  18. Caffeine consumption exceeding 6 cups of caffeinated tea/coffee (or equivalent) per day.
  19. Participant is, in the opinion of the Investigator, not suitable to participate in the study.
  20. Participation in any clinical study with an investigational drug/device within 3 months prior to the first day of dosing.
  21. Positive history for human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), Hepatitis B or Hepatitis C tests or tuberculosis.
  22. Serious adverse reaction or significant hypersensitivity to any drug.
  23. Clinically significant blood loss or blood donation > 500 milliliters (mL) within 3 months.
  24. Inadequate venous access.
  25. History of low blood counts or recurring infections.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Quadruple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Setmelanotide 0.5 mg
Participants received setmelanotide 0.5 milligrams (mg) once daily as a subcutaneous injection from Day 15 to Day 41 (4-week, double-blind randomized treatment period) and Day 42 to Day 55 (2-week, randomized withdrawal period).
subcutaneous injection
Other Names:
  • RM-493
Experimental: Setmelanotide 1.5 mg
Participants received setmelanotide 1.5 once daily as a subcutaneous injection from Day 15 to Day 41 (4-week, double-blind randomized treatment period), Day 42 to Day 55 (2-week, randomized withdrawal period), and Day 56 to Day 69 (optional 2-week, open-label extension period).
subcutaneous injection
Other Names:
  • RM-493
Experimental: Setmelanotide 2.5 mg
Participants received setmelanotide 2.5 once daily as a subcutaneous injection from Day 15 to Day 41 (4-week, double-blind randomized treatment period), Day 42 to Day 55 (2-week, randomized withdrawal period), and Day 56 to Day 69 (optional 2-week, open-label extension period).
subcutaneous injection
Other Names:
  • RM-493
Placebo Comparator: Placebo
Participants received placebo matched to setmelanotide once daily as a subcutaneous injection from Day 1 to Day 14 (2-week, single-blind run-in period), Day 15 to Day 41 (4-week, double-blind randomized treatment period), and Day 42 to Day 55 (2-week, randomized withdrawal period).
Subcutaneous injection

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number of Participants Who Experienced a Treatment-Emergent Adverse Event (TEAE) - Period 2
Time Frame: Days 15 to 41

An adverse event (AE) was any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical trial participant, temporally associated with the use of study treatment, whether or not considered related to the study treatment. An AE is considered to be treatment-emergent if the onset date/time is during or after administration of double-blind study drug or, in the event that onset time precedes double-blind study drug administration, the AE increases in severity during or after administration of double-blind study drug; in either case through 1-week after the last treatment dose. A serious adverse event (SAE) was any untoward medical occurrence that, at any dose:

  • Resulted in death;
  • Was life-threatening;
  • Required inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization;
  • Resulted in persistent disability/incapacity;
  • Was a congenital anomaly/birth defect
Days 15 to 41
Number of Participants Who Experienced a TEAE - Period 3
Time Frame: Days 42 to 55

An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical trial participant, temporally associated with the use of study treatment, whether or not considered related to the study treatment. An AE is considered to be treatment-emergent if the onset date/time is during or after administration of double-blind study drug or, in the event that onset time precedes double-blind study drug administration, the AE increases in severity during or after administration of double-blind study drug; in either case through 1-week after the last treatment dose. An SAE was any untoward medical occurrence that, at any dose:

  • Resulted in death;
  • Was life-threatening;
  • Required inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization;
  • Resulted in persistent disability/incapacity;
  • Was a congenital anomaly/birth defect
Days 42 to 55
Number of Participants Who Experienced a TEAE - Period 4
Time Frame: Days 56 to 69

An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical trial participant, temporally associated with the use of study treatment, whether or not considered related to the study treatment. An AE is considered to be treatment-emergent if the onset date/time is during or after administration of double-blind study drug or, in the event that onset time precedes double-blind study drug administration, the AE increases in severity during or after administration of double-blind study drug; in either case through 1-week after the last treatment dose. An SAE was any untoward medical occurrence that, at any dose:

  • Resulted in death;
  • Was life-threatening;
  • Required inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization;
  • Resulted in persistent disability/incapacity;
  • Was a congenital anomaly/birth defect
Days 56 to 69
Mean Body Weight - Period 2
Time Frame: Baseline (Day 15)
Baseline (Day 15)
Percent Change From Baseline in Body Weight - Period 2
Time Frame: Baseline (Day 15) and Day 42
Baseline (Day 15) and Day 42
Overall Score of Prader-Willi Syndrome (PWS) Hyperphagia Questionnaire - Period 2
Time Frame: Baseline (Day 15)
The hyperphagia questionnaire is a 10-item instrument designed to measure food-related preoccupations and problems in PWS, as well as the severity of these concerns. Three factors identified from this questionnaire are: Hyperphagic Drive, Hyperphagic Behaviors, and Hyperphagic Severity. Items are rated by care providers on a 5-point scale (1=not a problem to 5=a severe and/or frequent problem). Raw scores for each factor were used in data analyses, and the 3 domains were summed for an overall summary index of hyperphagia. Possible scores on the questionnaire range from a minimum score of 10 (no hyperphagia) to a maximum score of 50 (greater hyperphagia).
Baseline (Day 15)
Percent Change From Baseline in Overall Score of Prader-Willi Syndrome (PWS) Hyperphagia Questionnaire - Period 2
Time Frame: Baseline (Day 15) and Day 42
The hyperphagia questionnaire is a 10-item instrument designed to measure food-related preoccupations and problems in PWS, as well as the severity of these concerns. Three factors identified from this questionnaire are: Hyperphagic Drive, Hyperphagic Behaviors, and Hyperphagic Severity. Items are rated by care providers on a 5-point scale (1=not a problem to 5=a severe and/or frequent problem). Raw scores for each factor were used in data analyses, and the 3 domains were summed for an overall summary index of hyperphagia. Possible scores on the questionnaire range from a minimum score of 10 (no hyperphagia) to a maximum score of 50 (greater hyperphagia). Percent change from baseline in overall score of PWS hyperphagia questionnaire is presented.
Baseline (Day 15) and Day 42

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Percent Change From Baseline in Hyperphagic Drive Score of PWS Hyperphagia Questionnaire - Period 2
Time Frame: Baseline (Day 15) and Day 42
The hyperphagia questionnaire is a 10-item instrument designed to measure food-related preoccupations and problems in PWS, as well as the severity of these concerns. Hyperphagic drive score assesses the persistence in asking for food based on 4 items. All 4 items are rated by care providers on a 5-point scale (1=not a problem to 5=a severe and/or frequent problem). Possible scores for hyperphagic drive range from a minimum score of 4 (no hyperphagic drive) to a maximum score of 20 (greater hyperphagic drive). Percent change from baseline in hyperphagic drive score of PWS hyperphagia questionnaire is presented.
Baseline (Day 15) and Day 42
Percent Change From Baseline in Hyperphagic Behaviors Score of PWS Hyperphagia Questionnaire - Period 2
Time Frame: Baseline (Day 15) and Day 42
The hyperphagia questionnaire is a 10-item instrument designed to measure food-related preoccupations and problems in PWS, as well as the severity of these concerns. Hyperphagic behavior factor score assesses food seeking behaviors based on 4 items. All 4 items are rated by care providers on a 5-point scale (1=not a problem to 5=a severe and/or frequent problem). Possible scores for hyperphagic behaviors range from a minimum score of 4 (no hyperphagic behavior) to a maximum score of 20 (greater hyperphagic behavior). Percent change from baseline in hyperphagic behaviors score of PWS hyperphagia questionnaire is presented.
Baseline (Day 15) and Day 42
Percent Change From Baseline in Hyperphagic Severity Score of PWS Hyperphagia Questionnaire - Period 2
Time Frame: Baseline (Day 15) and Day 42
The hyperphagia questionnaire is a 10-item instrument designed to measure food-related preoccupations and problems in PWS, as well as the severity of these concerns. Hyperphagic severity factor score assesses the severity of hyperphagia based on 2 items. Both items are rated by care providers on a 5-point scale (1=not a problem to 5=a severe and/or frequent problem). Possible scores for hyperphagic severity range from a minimum score of 2 (no hyperphagic severity) to a maximum score of 10 (greater hyperphagic severity). Percent change from baseline in hyperphagic severity score of PWS hyperphagia questionnaire is presented.
Baseline (Day 15) and Day 42
Percent Change From Baseline in Overall Score of PWS Hyperphagia Questionnaire - Period 3
Time Frame: Baseline (Day 42) and Day 56
The hyperphagia questionnaire is a 10-item instrument designed to measure food-related preoccupations and problems in PWS, as well as the severity of these concerns. Three factors identified from this questionnaire are: Hyperphagic Drive, Hyperphagic Behaviors, and Hyperphagic Severity. Items are rated by care providers on a 5-point scale (1=not a problem to 5=a severe and/or frequent problem). Raw scores for each factor were used in data analyses, and the 3 domains were summed for an overall summary index of hyperphagia. Possible scores on the questionnaire range from a minimum score of 10 (no hyperphagia) to a maximum score of 50 (greater hyperphagia). Percent change from baseline in overall score of PWS hyperphagia questionnaire is presented.
Baseline (Day 42) and Day 56
Percent Change From Baseline in Overall Score of PWS Hyperphagia Questionnaire - Period 4
Time Frame: Baseline (Day 56) and Day 70
The hyperphagia questionnaire is a 10-item instrument designed to measure food-related preoccupations and problems in PWS, as well as the severity of these concerns. Three factors identified from this questionnaire are: Hyperphagic Drive, Hyperphagic Behaviors, and Hyperphagic Severity. Items are rated by care providers on a 5-point scale (1=not a problem to 5=a severe and/or frequent problem). Raw scores for each factor were used in data analyses, and the 3 domains were summed for an overall summary index of hyperphagia. Possible scores on the questionnaire range from a minimum score of 10 (no hyperphagia) to a maximum score of 50 (greater hyperphagia). Percent change from baseline in overall score of PWS hyperphagia questionnaire is presented.
Baseline (Day 56) and Day 70
Mean Setmelanotide Trough Concentrations
Time Frame: 5 minutes predose on Day 42 and Day 70
The average of setmelanotide trough concentrations values for both timepoints (5 minutes predose on Day 42 and Day 70) is presented.
5 minutes predose on Day 42 and Day 70
Maximum Drug Concentration (Cmax) of Setmelanotide During a 24-Hour Steady-State Interval
Time Frame: Starting on any day from Day 63 through 69, a 24-hour PK profile obtained; blood samples were collected at 0 (within 5 minutes predose), 1, 2, 4, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 12, and 24 hours after dosing
Maximum drug concentration determined directly from individual concentration-time data.
Starting on any day from Day 63 through 69, a 24-hour PK profile obtained; blood samples were collected at 0 (within 5 minutes predose), 1, 2, 4, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 12, and 24 hours after dosing
Time to the Maximum Drug Concentration (Tmax) of Setmelanotide During a 24-Hour Steady-State Interval
Time Frame: Starting on any day from Day 63 through 69, a 24-hour PK profile obtained; blood samples were collected at 0 (within 5 minutes predose), 1, 2, 4, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 12, and 24 hours after dosing
Maximum drug concentration determined directly from individual concentration-time data.
Starting on any day from Day 63 through 69, a 24-hour PK profile obtained; blood samples were collected at 0 (within 5 minutes predose), 1, 2, 4, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 12, and 24 hours after dosing
Area Under the Drug Concentration-Time Curve From Time-Zero to 24 Hours Postdose (AUC24h) of Setmelanotide During a 24-Hour Steady-State Interval
Time Frame: Starting on any day from Day 63 through 69, a 24-hour PK profile obtained; blood samples were collected at 0 (within 5 minutes predose), 1, 2, 4, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 12, and 24 hours after dosing
Starting on any day from Day 63 through 69, a 24-hour PK profile obtained; blood samples were collected at 0 (within 5 minutes predose), 1, 2, 4, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 12, and 24 hours after dosing
Volume of Distribution (Vd) of Setmelanotide During a 24-Hour Steady-State Interval
Time Frame: Starting on any day from Day 63 through 69, a 24-hour PK profile obtained; blood samples were collected at 0 (within 5 minutes predose), 1, 2, 4, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 12, and 24 hours after dosing
Volume of distribution calculated as Dose/The observed terminal rate constant*AUC24h.
Starting on any day from Day 63 through 69, a 24-hour PK profile obtained; blood samples were collected at 0 (within 5 minutes predose), 1, 2, 4, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 12, and 24 hours after dosing
Total Clearance (CL) of Setmelanotide During a 24-Hour Steady-State Interval
Time Frame: Starting on any day from Day 63 through 69, a 24-hour PK profile obtained; blood samples were collected at 0 (within 5 minutes predose), 1, 2, 4, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 12, and 24 hours after dosing
Clearance after extravascular administration; calculated as Dose/AUC24h.
Starting on any day from Day 63 through 69, a 24-hour PK profile obtained; blood samples were collected at 0 (within 5 minutes predose), 1, 2, 4, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 12, and 24 hours after dosing
Change From Baseline in Body Weight - Period 2
Time Frame: Baseline (Day 15) and Day 42
Baseline (Day 15) and Day 42
Percent Change From Baseline in Body Weight - Period 3
Time Frame: Baseline (Day 42) and Day 56
Baseline (Day 42) and Day 56
Percent Change From Baseline in Body Weight - Period 4
Time Frame: Baseline (Day 56) and Day 70
Baseline (Day 56) and Day 70
Percent Change From Baseline in Body Weight for Continuous Active and Continuous Placebo Treatments - Period 2 and 3
Time Frame: Baseline (Day 15), Day 42, Day 56
Baseline (Day 15), Day 42, Day 56
Percent Change From Baseline in Body Fat Measured Using Dual x-Ray Absorptiometry (DEXA) - Period 2
Time Frame: Baseline (Day 15) and Day 42
Total body fat was assessed by DEXA scan.
Baseline (Day 15) and Day 42
Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Percent Change From Baseline in Body Fat Measured Using DEXA - Period 4
Time Frame: Baseline (Day 56) and Day 70
Total body fat was assessed by DEXA scan. Number of participants with clinically significant percent change from baseline in body fat were judged by investigator.
Baseline (Day 56) and Day 70
Percent Change From Baseline in Body Mass Measured Using DEXA - Period 2
Time Frame: Baseline (Day 15) and Day 42
Total body mass was assessed by DEXA scan.
Baseline (Day 15) and Day 42
Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Percent Change From Baseline in Body Mass Measured Using DEXA - Period 4
Time Frame: Baseline (Day 56) and Day 70
Total body mass was assessed by DEXA scan. Number of participants with clinically significant percent change from baseline in body mass were judged by investigator.
Baseline (Day 56) and Day 70

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Director: David Meeker, Rhythm Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

March 19, 2015

Primary Completion (Actual)

October 26, 2016

Study Completion (Actual)

October 26, 2016

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 25, 2014

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 4, 2014

First Posted (Estimated)

December 8, 2014

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

July 27, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 6, 2023

Last Verified

July 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

Yes

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Prader-Willi Syndrome

Clinical Trials on Placebo

Subscribe