Controlled Study About Implementation of a Computerized Depression Guideline in Primary Care (GPC-DEPc)

December 29, 2014 updated by: Diego J. Palao-VIdal, Corporacion Parc Tauli
The aim of this study is to evaluate the effects of an active multifactor implementation process of a Computerized Depression Guideline in Primary Care. The CPG-DEPc use use, the key outcomes and its maintenance over time in patients and professionals will be analyzed.

Study Overview

Status

Unknown

Conditions

Detailed Description

The application of scientific evidence on major depression in clinical practice is complex. Many studies show that over 50% of depressed patients in primary care do not receive proper attention, or are ineffective or potentially harmful treatments. In general, the process of dissemination and implementation of Clinical Practice Guidelines (CPG) in printed version induce a minor improvement in clinical practice. The adaptation of the CPG of Major Depression in Adults (CPG-DEPC) in Catalonia (Spain), as a computerized integrated version, offers an extraordinary opportunity to improve outcomes in Primary Care. The integrated design allows precise access to help in the visit itself, to improve diagnosis validation process, the recommended treatment and facilitate monitoring and evaluation of suicide risk in depressed patients.

This study aims to evaluate the effects of an active multifactor implementation process of a Computerized Depression Guideline in Primary Care. The GPC-DEPc use, the key outcomes and its maintenance over time in patients and professionals will be analyzed.

A cluster randomized trial, multicenter study in ten Primary Care Centers in Barcelona, coordinated by the same Mental Health Service, will be done. In five of the Centers will be actively implemented the CPG-DEPc and the other five will proceed as usual process, as a reference. The active process includes the establishment of local implementation teams, seminars, regular feedback and follow-up visits for four months. The main outcome will be the rate of patients with possible depression treated in the analyzed period in which at least were used any of the instruments that the Guide recommended (to rule out or confirm the diagnosis, choose the optimal treatment or follow-up the clinical maintenance best options). Other professionals and patients secondary outcome measures will be analyzed (incidence of major depression registers, referrals to mental health specialists, use of recommended antidepressants and rates of patients in clinical remission). At the end of the study, the suicide and suicide attempts rate and the data about the direct and indirect health cost will be analyzed.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

10

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients over 18 years.
  • Diagnosis of major depression (F32. **,F33.** according to International Classification of Diseases-10)
  • Attended in any of the 10 selected Primary Care Centers (from Barcelona, Spain)
  • Patients with suspected depression in which the diagnosis is discarded using the Guide.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with diagnosed or suspected major depression treated by professionals who have not given their consent to participate in the study.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Health Services Research
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Active Implementation of Guidelines
Primary Care Centers where the experimental strategies of guidelines implementation will be done
Experimental strategies of Depression Guidelines implementation in Primary Care Centers. The active process includes the establishment of local implementation teams, seminars, regular feedback and follow-up visits for four months.
No Intervention: No Active Implementation of Guidelines
Primary Care Centers where the experimental strategies of guidelines implementation not will be done

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
The rate of patients in which the instruments from the Computerized Depression Guideline were used.
Time Frame: 4 months
The rate of patients with possible depression treated in the analyzed period in which at least one of the instruments that the Guide recommended were used (to rule out or confirm the diagnosis, choose the optimal treatment or the best clinical follow-up option).
4 months
The rate of patients in which the instruments from the Computerized Depression Guideline were used.
Time Frame: 6 months
6 months
The rate of patients in which the instruments from the Computerized Depression Guideline were used.
Time Frame: 12 months
12 months
The rate of patients in which the instruments from the Computerized Depression Guideline were used.
Time Frame: 18 months
18 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Incidence of major depression patients registered in the electronical clinical record.
Time Frame: 6 months
New major depression cases (F32.**; F33.**) registered in the electronical clinical record.
6 months
Incidence of major depression patients registered in the electronical clinical record.
Time Frame: 12 months
12 months
Incidence of major depression patients registered in the electronical clinical record.
Time Frame: 18 months
18 months
Rates of suicide and suicide attempts
Time Frame: 18 months
18 months
Total health cost of depression
Time Frame: 18 months
Direct and indirect health cost of major depression patients registered in electronical clinical record
18 months
Total referrals to mental health specialists
Time Frame: 6 months
6 months
Total referrals to mental health specialists
Time Frame: 12 months
12 months
Total referrals to mental health specialists
Time Frame: 18 months
18 months
Use Rate of the recommended antidepressives for the guideline
Time Frame: 6 months
6 months
Use Rate of the recommended antidepressives for the guideline
Time Frame: 12 months
12 months
Use Rate of the recommended antidepressives for the guideline
Time Frame: 18 months
18 months
Rate of patients in clinical remission
Time Frame: 6 months
The clinical remission of depression symptoms is defined by a Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) Score of < 5 points
6 months
Rate of patients in clinical remission
Time Frame: 12 months
12 months
Rate of patients in clinical remission
Time Frame: 18 months
18 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Diego J Palao, Corporacion Parc Taulí Sabadell, University Hospital (Barcelona, Spain)

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

January 1, 2015

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

June 1, 2016

Study Completion (Anticipated)

December 1, 2016

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

December 29, 2014

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 29, 2014

First Posted (Estimate)

December 31, 2014

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

December 31, 2014

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 29, 2014

Last Verified

December 1, 2014

More Information

Terms related to this study

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Depression

Clinical Trials on Experimental strategies of guidelines implementation

3
Subscribe