Effectiveness of an Intervention Program for Fine Motor Skills

May 28, 2015 updated by: Encarnación Aguilar Ferrandiz, Universidad de Granada

Effectiveness of an Intervention Program for Fine Motor Skills in Institutionalized Elderly Residents: a Randomized Clinical Trial

Investigators have created a protocol of intervention to treating the general disability of upper limbs.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

A protocol of intervention for fine motor skills will be performed on institutionalized elderly people.

This protocol consist on implementation of a manual activity that it is well known in the clinical setting.

This activity will enhance several skills such as strength, coordination of upper limbs, range of motion, general auto-efficacy and the quality of life.

The intervention or rehabilitation will be implemented for two month.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

40

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Granada, Spain, 18016
        • Maria Encarnación Aguilar Ferrandiz

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

65 years and older (Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Institutionalized elderly people, on a full or part-time.
  • Voluntary participation.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Cognitive impairment (< 23 in normal school population and < 20 points with a low education or illiteracy, in Spanish validation of Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE)).
  • Postural control problems.
  • Balance disorders, while the subject is seated.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Intervention for fine motor skills
Implementation of an well known activity to improve the function of upper extremities
Implementation of an well known activity to improve the function of upper extremities
Other Names:
  • Performing of a specific manual activity
Placebo Comparator: Support to activities of daily living
Performing of general activities planned in the centres where the participants are included
Participants are supported and orientated when they are performing some activity of daily living scheduled by the institution
Other Names:
  • Performing of activities of daily living

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Change from Baseline in Disability of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) questionnaire at 8 weeks
Time Frame: Eight weeks
Eight weeks
Change from Baseline in Disability of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) questionnaire at 16 weeks
Time Frame: Sixteen weeks
Sixteen weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change from Baseline in General self-efficacy at 8 weeks
Time Frame: Eight weeks
Eight weeks
Change from Baseline in General self-efficacy at 16 weeks
Time Frame: Sixteen weeks
Sixteen weeks
Change from Baseline in Purdue Pegboard Tests at 8 weeks
Time Frame: Eight weeks
Eight weeks
Change from Baseline in Purdue Pegboard Tests at 16 weeks
Time Frame: Sixteen weeks
Sixteen weeks
Change from Baseline in finger goniometer at 8 weeks
Time Frame: Eight weeks
Active and passive measures of motion in first, second and fifth fingers of dominant hand will be recorded .
Eight weeks
Change from Baseline in finger goniometer at 16 weeks
Time Frame: Sixteen weeks
Active and passive measures of motion in first, second and fifth fingers of dominant hand will be recorded .
Sixteen weeks
Change from Baseline in Pinch Gauge at 8 weeks
Time Frame: Eight weeks
Eight weeks
Change from Baseline in Pinch Gauge at 16 weeks
Time Frame: Sixteen weeks
Sixteen weeks
Change from Baseline in Short-Form health survey questionnaire (SF-36) at 8 weeks
Time Frame: Eight weeks
Eight weeks
Change from Baseline in Short-Form health survey questionnaire (SF-36) at 16 weeks
Time Frame: Sixteen weeks
Sixteen weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Mª Encarnacion ME Aguilar, PdH, Universidad de Granada

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

May 1, 2014

Primary Completion (Actual)

January 1, 2015

Study Completion (Actual)

January 1, 2015

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

December 31, 2014

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 31, 2014

First Posted (Estimate)

January 5, 2015

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

May 29, 2015

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 28, 2015

Last Verified

May 1, 2015

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • Fine motor skills

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Hand Injuries

Clinical Trials on Intervention for fine motor skills

Subscribe