Coronary Steal Via Natural Internal Mammary Artery-To-Coronary Artery Bypasses (CIMA)

February 13, 2023 updated by: University Hospital Inselspital, Berne

CORONARY ARTERY DISEASE AND THE BENEFIT OF BYPASSES

Despite considerable advances in medicine, cardiovascular diseases remain the number one cause of death globally. In industrialized countries, coronary artery disease (CAD) is the leading cause of death, consequence of myocardial infarction (MI). Artificial - or natural - bypasses exert a protective effect by providing an alternative source of blood flow to a myocardial territory potentially affected by an acute coronary occlusion. Coronary collaterals represent pre-existing inter-arterial anastomoses and as such are the natural counter-part of surgically created bypasses. In patients with chronic CAD, sufficient coronary collaterals have been shown to confer a significant benefits in terms of overall mortality and cardiovascular events.

EXTRACARDIAC-TO-CORONARY COLLATERAL SUPPLY

Commonly, coronary collaterals are implicitly understood to exist between coronary artery branches. However, the structural existence of coronary collaterals with an extracardiac connection has been confirmed by anatomical investigations. Pathophysiologically and with regard to a potential for arteriogenic stimulation, the connections from the internal mammary arteries, are of special interest.

In a recently published work the investigators have investigated the effect of temporary balloon occlusion of the distal IMA on coronary collateral function. There were equivocal findings for the left circumflex coronary artery: CFI was increased by ipsilateral IMA occlusion, but the level of myocardial ischemia was unchanged.

MYOCARDIAL STEAL VIA INTERNAL MAMMARY ARTERIES

In the investigators' previous study, the coronary occlusion with simultaneous distal IMA occlusion was always performed first as a conservative measure against false-positive detection of internal-mammary-to-coronary artery connections. Repetitive coronary occlusions per se result in higher collateral flow by collateral recruitment and reduced ischemia by ischemic preconditioning and augmented collateral function. Conversely, the sensitivity of the employed method was reduced and might have contributed to the equivocal findings in case of the left circumflex artery. Moreover, the hypothesize d mechanism of localized pressure augmentation was not investigated.

This study aims to further characterize the prevalence and function of natural ipsilateral IMA-to-coronary connections, as well as to investigate the hemodynamic mechanisms of coronary collateral function augmentation by distal IMA occlusion. In the investigators' last study, the increased coronary collateral function in response to manipulation of a potential coronary collateral donor (in this case, the IMA) was taken as indirect evidence for the existence of IMA-to-coronary-artery connections. Thus, the employed distal IMA occlusion served as a positive stimulus. Conceptually, additional evaluation with a negative stimulus could heighten the discriminatory power of the investigation. This could be in the form of a hyperemic stimulus affecting the collateral donor, ie in analogy to myocardial or coronary steal (ie, a reduction in coronary collateral supply to a collateral recipient).

Study Overview

Detailed Description

CORONARY ARTERY DISEASE AND THE BENEFIT OF BYPASSES

Despite considerable advances in medicine, cardiovascular diseases remain the number one cause of death globally. In industrialized countries, coronary artery disease (CAD) is the leading cause of death, consequence of myocardial infarction (MI).

In patients with acute coronary syndrome, percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) has been shown to improve outcomes.2 However, in stable CAD, PCI has not been demonstrated to reduce the incidence of myocardial infarction or death. Coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) was superior to PCI in patients with diabetes and multivessel coronary artery disease. CABG significantly reduced rates of death and myocardial infarction compared to PCI, but with a higher rate of stroke. Furthermore, in patients with advanced coronary artery disease, rates of myocardial infarction were more than 60% lower with CABG compared to PCI.

Conceptually, the benefit of CABG over PCI is not surprising as PCI targets significant coronary lesions thought to be responsible for causing ischemia. However, the deleterious effects of atherosclerosis are not typically preceded by significant luminal vascular narrowing. The vulnerable plaque eventually becoming the culprit plaque (causing myocardial infarction or sudden cardiac death) is typically relatively nonstenotic. Furthermore, due to being multifocal and widespread, plaque vulnerability is not a target for, nor amenable to PCI.

Conversely, artificial - or natural - bypasses exert a protective effect by providing an alternative source of blood flow to a myocardial territory potentially affected by an acute coronary occlusion. Coronary collaterals represent pre-existing inter-arterial anastomoses and as such are the natural counter-part of surgically created bypasses. In patients with chronic CAD, sufficient coronary collaterals have been shown to confer a significant benefits in terms of overall mortality and cardiovascular events.

EXTRACARDIAC-TO-CORONARY COLLATERAL SUPPLY

Commonly, coronary collaterals are implicitly understood to exist between coronary artery branches. However, the structural existence of coronary collaterals with an extracardiac connection has been confirmed by anatomical investigations. Pathophysiologically and with regard to a potential for arteriogenic stimulation, the connections from the internal mammary arteries, are of special interest. Indeed, before the advent of coronary bypass surgery, several clinical studies examined the usefulness of a minimally invasive surgery to augment collateral flow to the heart via these internal-mammary-to-coronary-artery connections in patients with angina pectoris. The performed distal bilateral ligation of the internal mammary arteries was thought to improve flow over naturally pre-existing anastomoses between the internal mammary arteries and the coronary circulation.

In a recently published work the investigators have investigated the effect of temporary balloon occlusion of the distal IMA on coronary collateral function. 180 pairs of measurements were performed in 120 patients electively referred for coronary angiography. Levels of collateral function and myocardial ischemia were determined during two coronary balloon occlusions, the first with, the second without distal IMA balloon occlusion. Coronary collateral function, determined by collateral flow index (CFI) was consistently increased by ipsilateral, but not contralateral IMA balloon occlusion in the left anterior descending (LAD) coronary artery and the right coronary artery (RCA). Furthermore, these findings were corroborated by the observed reduction in ischemia as assessed by the sensitive tool of intracoronary ECG. However, there were equivocal findings for the left circumflex coronary artery: CFI was increased by ipsilateral IMA occlusion, but the level of myocardial ischemia was unchanged.

MYOCARDIAL STEAL VIA INTERNAL MAMMARY ARTERIES

In the investigators' previous study, the coronary occlusion with simultaneous distal IMA occlusion was always performed first as a conservative measure against false-positive detection of internal-mammary-to-coronary artery connections. Repetitive coronary occlusions per se result in higher collateral flow by collateral recruitment and reduced ischemia by ischemic preconditioning and augmented collateral function. Conversely, the sensitivity of the employed method was reduced and might have contributed to the equivocal findings in case of the left circumflex artery. Moreover, the hypothesize d mechanism of localized pressure augmentation was not investigated.

This study aims to further characterize the prevalence and function of natural ipsilateral IMA-to-coronary connections, as well as to investigate the hemodynamic mechanisms of coronary collateral function augmentation by distal IMA occlusion. In the investigators' last study, the increased coronary collateral function in response to manipulation of a potential coronary collateral donor (in this case, the IMA) was taken as indirect evidence for the existence of IMA-to-coronary-artery connections. Thus, the employed distal IMA occlusion served as a positive stimulus. Conceptually, additional evaluation with a negative stimulus could heighten the discriminatory power of the investigation. This could be in the form of a hyperemic stimulus affecting the collateral donor, ie in analogy to myocardial or coronary steal (ie, a reduction in coronary collateral supply to a collateral recipient).

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

40

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Bern, Switzerland, 3010
        • Bern University Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Probability Sample

Study Population

Patients electively referred for coronary angiography

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age > 18 years
  • Referred for elective coronary angiography
  • Written informed consent to participate in the study

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Acute coronary syndrome; unstable cardiopulmonary conditions
  • Severe cardiac valve disease
  • Congestive heart failure NYHA III-IV
  • Prior coronary artery bypass surgery / prior cardiac surgery
  • Coronary artery disease unsuitable for intracoronary pressure measurements
  • Prior Q-wave myocardial infarction in the vascular territory undergoing collateral function determination
  • Severe renal or hepatic failure
  • Pregnancy

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Observational Models: Cohort
  • Time Perspectives: Prospective

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
Coronary Artery Disease
Patient with significant coronary artery disease
Coronary Artery Balloon Occlusion for Determination of Collateral Flow Index
No Coronary Artery Disease
Patient without significant coronary artery disease
Coronary Artery Balloon Occlusion for Determination of Collateral Flow Index

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Coronary collateral function (CFI)
Time Frame: Baseline
Coronary collateral function (CFI)
Baseline

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Myocardial ischemia during temporary coronary balloon occlusion
Time Frame: Baseline
Baseline
Proximal IMA pressure immediately before and during (ipsilateral) reactive arm hyperemia.
Time Frame: Baseline
Baseline
Distal IMA CFI
Time Frame: Baseline
Baseline

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

December 1, 2014

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

November 1, 2020

Study Completion (ACTUAL)

July 1, 2021

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 5, 2015

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 5, 2015

First Posted (ESTIMATE)

January 7, 2015

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ESTIMATE)

February 14, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 13, 2023

Last Verified

February 1, 2023

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Ischemia

Clinical Trials on Coronary Artery Balloon Occlusion for Determination of Collateral Flow Index

Subscribe