Biopsies in Oncology - Prospective Study of Impact on Patient's Quality of Life.

July 12, 2024 updated by: University Health Network, Toronto

Over the past decade the paradigm of care in oncology has evolved with the advent of personalized medicine. Yet, despite this exciting prospect, there are currently only a few disease subtypes where therapeutic approaches with proven benefit exist such as EGFR (Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor) targeted therapies in EGFR-mutant lung tumours. With the increasing number of novel molecularly targeted agents available, the importance of building our understanding of cancer biology is critical.

Challenges to implement personalized medicine include the limitations of molecular testing, tumour heterogeneity and molecular evolution, costs, and the quality and morbidity associated with tumour biopsies. Sequential biopsies are essential to better understand biological markers of response and resistance, and identify predictive or prognostic markers. Despite the scientific rationale for biopsies, incorporating them into practice can be challenging, as in many cases there is no direct advantage to the patient. This project aims to understand the effect of research biopsies on the patient. The Investigator hypothesize by learning more and gaining a better appreciation of the impact on the patient, Investigators will increase the likelihood of achieving serial biopsies.

The ability to obtain serial biopsies is dependent on the patient's experience. To understand the clonal progression of cancer and validate predictive and prognostic markers of response, studies now target biopsies both at enrollment and at progression. As Investigators strive to achieve this, improving our understanding of the patient's experience will help us identify factors that positively and negatively impact on patient participation and influence the probability of successfully obtaining sequential samples.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Detailed Description

Both primary and secondary objectives will be assessed in a questionnaire. Primary Objectives To assess the impact of research biopsies on patients quality of life.

Secondary Objectives To assess the impact of diagnostic biopsies on quality of life in comparison to research biopsies.

To assess the true complication rates associated with biopsies. To compare types of biopsies - surgical versus radiological with respect to implications on quality of life.

To assess the individual potentially modifiable factors of reason for biopsy; perceived risk; perceived benefit; wait time for biopsy; wait time for results; complications; and altruism and association with anxiety.

To determine which factors are associated with a higher and lower likelihood of achieving serial biopsies.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

129

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Ontario
      • Toronto, Ontario, Canada, M5G 1X6
        • Princess Margaret Cancer Centre

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

The patient must be 18 years or older with a life expectancy of greater than 3 months. The patient must be undergoing a biopsy for research or diagnostic purposes with a diagnosis of malignancy or an assumed diagnosis of malignancy. The patient must be able to complete the questionnaires independently.

Description

Criteria:

Inclusion Criteria:

Patient must be ≥18 years old. ECOG (Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group) performance status ≤2 (Karnofsky ≥60%).

Life expectancy of greater than 3 months Must be undergoing a biopsy for research or diagnostic purposes. Have a diagnosis of malignancy or an assumed diagnosis of malignancy in patients where the biopsy is being performed for diagnostic purposes.

Able to complete questionnaires independently. Ability to understand and the willingness to sign a written informed consent document.

Both men and women of all races and ethnic groups are eligible for this trial. Verbal translation will be available for the consent and assistance with the questionnaires. If language is a second language or the patient is unable to read the questionnaire for any reason a family member may assist with the questionnaires.

Exclusion Criteria:

Patients who do not have a biopsy scheduled and performed.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
The primary objective is to assess the impact of research biopsies on patients quality of life.
Time Frame: 6-8 months
6-8 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
To assess the impact of diagnostic biopsies on quality of life in comparison to research biopsies
Time Frame: at minimum: 6 months
at minimum: 6 months
To assess the true complication rates associated with biopsies
Time Frame: at minimum: 6 months
at minimum: 6 months
To compare types of biopsies - surgical versus radiological with respect to implications on quality of life
Time Frame: at minimum: 6 months
at minimum: 6 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Amit Oza, MD, University Health Network, Toronto

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

January 1, 2014

Primary Completion (Actual)

December 1, 2022

Study Completion (Actual)

December 1, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 6, 2015

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 6, 2015

First Posted (Estimated)

January 8, 2015

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

July 16, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 12, 2024

Last Verified

July 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Other Study ID Numbers

  • BIOPSy

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Pathology

Subscribe