Benefits of Laparoscopy by Single Port Access for Adnexal Surgery

Comparison Between Classic and Single Port Access Laparoscopy for Adnexal Surgery on Postoperative Pain: a Randomized Study.

Introduction

Single port access (SPA) is a recent laparoscopic technic evaluated in several pathologies. Benefits of this technic is poorly reported concerning adnexal surgical procedures. Results of both randomised studies including adnexectomy and ovarian cystectomy are discordants. So it seems interesting to conduct a new study about this technic. Aim of this study is to compare postoperative pain after laparoscopic surgery for adnexal pathology by SPA or classic laparoscopy (CL).

Materiel and Methods

We purpose a monocentric-randomised study. Inclusion criteria are women over 18 years requiring laparoscopic surgery for adnexal pathology with stratification for procedure (adnexectomy or ovarian cystectomy). After informed consent, patients will be randomised in two groups: laparoscopy with SPA and laparoscopy with CL. The main objective is postoperative pain evaluation at 24 hours. Secondary objectives are characteristics and perioperative complications, duration of procedure, postoperative quality of life and immediate postoperative pain.

We hypothesis laparoscopy with SPA reduces postoperative pain at 24 hours of 2 pts (analogic scale 0-10). The estimated size of population number is 54 per group and 108 for the study.

Expected results

We expected a significant decrease of postoperative pain with SPA technic. This data will be interesting to promote use of SPA technic for adnexal surgery.

Study Overview

Status

Unknown

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

108

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Marseille, France, 13354
        • Assistance Publique Hopitaux de Marseille

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

Female

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

Presumed benign adnexal disease Adnexal pathologies treated between 7:00 AM and 10:00 PM Signed informed consent Patient presenting no contraindication to laparoscopy

Exclusion Criteria:

Salpingitis and twist annexes. The patient does not fluently read French.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Classic laparoscopy
Patients will undergo laparoscopy surgery with classic laparoscopy technic.
Experimental: Laparoscopy single port access
Patients will undergo laparoscopy surgery by single port access technic.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Postoperative pain measured with visual analog scale
Time Frame: Postoperative pain evaluation at 24 hours
Postoperative pain evaluation at 24 hours

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Postoperative pain measured with visual analog scale
Time Frame: 2 hours, 4 hours, 6 hours, 1 month
2 hours, 4 hours, 6 hours, 1 month
timing in minutes between incision and suture
Time Frame: 4 hours
4 hours
Blood lost in milliliters (mls)
Time Frame: 1 hour
1 hour
Inpatient numbers of days
Time Frame: 1 month
1 month
Non steroid anti inflammatory numbers of pills taken
Time Frame: 1 month
1 month
number of convertion to laparotomy, Postoperative hernia
Time Frame: 1 month
1 month
visual analog scale for cosmetic satisfaction
Time Frame: 1 year
1 year

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Director: Urielle DESALBRES, AP-HM

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

April 1, 2016

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

April 1, 2018

Study Completion (Anticipated)

April 1, 2019

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 12, 2016

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 12, 2016

First Posted (Estimate)

April 15, 2016

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

April 15, 2016

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 12, 2016

Last Verified

April 1, 2016

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 2015-A01217-42
  • 2015-32 (Other Identifier: AP-HM)

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Adnexal Pathology

Clinical Trials on Adnexal surgery

3
Subscribe