- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT02349334
UK Trial of Percutaneous Tibial Nerve Stimulation in Patients With Faecal Incontinence (CONFIDeNT)
CONtrol of Faecal Incontinence Using Distal NeuromodulaTion (CONFIDeNT)
Faecal incontinence occurs when a person passes faeces (stools) without the usual control. It is a distressing condition that is actually very common although under-reported because of embarrassment. Milder symptoms may be managed by treatments such as dietary change, drugs and bowel retraining, but many patients still resort to surgery to improve symptoms. Although several operations exist to treat incontinence e.g. those aiming to repair damaged anal sphincter muscles, it is now clear that these often have poor results.
Two relatively new treatments called sacral nerve stimulation (SNS) and percutaneous tibial nerve stimulation (PTNS) involve sending pulses of electricity to the nerves controlling the bowel and muscles of the anus (anal sphincter).
SNS does this by inserting electrodes in the lower back just above the tailbone and connecting them to an implanted electrical stimulator which is buried in the buttock and acts a bit like a heart pacemaker. SNS is a relatively well-established treatment in specialist centres, which has been used for over 10 years. It has been shown in studies to be successful for faecal incontinence achieving some improvement in at least three quarters of patients. In Europe, this procedure is fast becoming first treatment offered when non-surgical treatments fail. Nevertheless, SNS is not a miracle cure for all, requiring 2 operations, with potential complications and expensive equipment (> £10,000 approx).
PTNS is a newer treatment, which involves electrically stimulating a nerve at the ankle, using a very small needle, as an outpatient (a bit like acupuncture). This sends signals back to the spine region to try and improve symptoms of faecal incontinence. Since this is a newer treatment, fewer studies have been performed to quantify how successful it is, but early results of PTNS suggest that it may be as good as SNS. If this is true, this is very important because it is much less invasive and considerably cheaper than SNS (equipment £500 per patient).
This project will for the first time determine how effective PTNS is in the treatment of patients with faecal incontinence, by comparing it to sham (fake stimulation). This study is a properly designed clinical trial of 212 patients in at least 14 UK Specialist Centres.. The results of this trial will lead to direct benefits for patients and the NHS.
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Phase
- Phase 3
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Faecal incontinence sufficiently severe enough to warrant intervention
- Failure of appropriate conservative therapies
- Age ≥ 18 years
Exclusion Criteria:
- Inability to provide informed consent for the research study
- Inability to fill in the detailed bowel diaries required for outcome assessments (this will exclude participants who do not speak / read English)*
- Neurological diseases, such as diabetic neuropathy, multiple sclerosis and Parkinson's disease (any participant with painful peripheral neuropathy)
- Anatomical limitations that would prevent successful placement of needle electrode
- Other medical conditions precluding stimulation: e.g. bleeding disorders, certain cardiac pacemakers, peripheral vascular disease or ulcer, lower leg cellulitis
- Congenital anorectal anomalies or absence of native rectum due to surgery
- A cloacal defect
- Present evidence of external full thickness rectal prolapse
- Previous rectal surgery (rectopexy / resection) done < 12 months ago (24 months for cancer),
- Stoma in situ
- Chronic bowel diseases such as inflammatory bowel disease leading to chronic uncontrolled diarrhoea
- Pregnancy or intention to become pregnant
- Previous experience of SNS or PTNS
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Triple
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Sham Comparator: Sham electrical stimulation
Sham electrical stimulation to forefoot by TENS
|
|
|
Active Comparator: Percutaneous tibial nerve stimulation
Active PTNS via Urgent PC Neuromodulation device, Uroplasty
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Primary outcome: Binary - success or failure based on % patients achieving > or = 50% reduction in faecal incontinence episodes
Time Frame: 3 months
|
From 2 weekly bowel diaries before and after treatment
|
3 months
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Time Frame |
|---|---|
|
Reduction in faecal incontinence episodes
Time Frame: 3 months
|
3 months
|
|
Proportion of patients achieving >25%, >75% and 100% reduction in faecal incotinence episodes
Time Frame: 3 months
|
3 months
|
|
Reduction in Cleveland Clinic Constipation Score
Time Frame: 3 months
|
3 months
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start
Primary Completion (Actual)
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Estimate)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Estimate)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- 34825
- 09/104/16 (Other Grant/Funding Number: NIHR Health Technology Assessment Programme)
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Bowel Incontinence
-
University of PennsylvaniaUniversity of Alabama at BirminghamCompletedFecal Incontinence | Incontinence | Bowel Incontinence | Accidental Bowel LeakageUnited States
-
Pelvalon, Inc.CompletedFecal Incontinence | Bowel Dysfunction | Bowel Incontinence | Accidental Bowel LeakageUnited States
-
Assiut UniversityRecruiting
-
Mayo ClinicNational Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (NIDDK); University... and other collaboratorsCompleted
-
NICHD Pelvic Floor Disorders NetworkEunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development... and other collaboratorsCompletedFecal Incontinence | Bowel IncontinenceUnited States
-
Renew MedicalCompletedBowel IncontinenceUnited States
-
Groupe Hospitalier Paris Saint JosephHôpital Louis MourierWithdrawnCrohn Disease
-
Augusta UniversityRecruiting
-
London North West Healthcare NHS TrustKing's College London; Queen Mary University of LondonCompletedFecal Incontinence | Inflammatory Bowel Disease (IBD)United Kingdom
-
David ChuPatient-Centered Outcomes Research InstituteRecruitingNeurogenic Bowel | Spina Bifida | Bowel IncontinenceUnited States
Clinical Trials on Percutaneous Tibial Nerve Stimulation
-
Fisiocore LC,SLRecruitingOveractive Bladder SyndromeSpain
-
London North West Healthcare NHS TrustUroplasty, IncUnknown
-
University of Kansas Medical CenterCompleted
-
Region SkaneCompleted
-
Sierra Varona SLUniversidad Complutense de MadridNot yet recruitingMultiple Sclerosis | Neurogenic Overactive Bladder
-
Cantonal Hospital of St. GallenCompletedFecal IncontinenceSwitzerland
-
Region SkaneNot yet recruitingFissure in AnoSweden
-
Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation TrustUnknown
-
University Hospital, AngersCompleted
-
Stony Brook UniversityCompletedFemale Sexual DysfunctionUnited States