ACP-196 (Acalabrutinib) in Combination With Pembrolizumab, for Treatment of Hematologic Malignancies (KEYNOTE145)

January 19, 2024 updated by: Acerta Pharma BV

A Phase 1b/2 Proof-of-Concept Study of the Combination of ACP-196 (Acalabrutinib) and Pembrolizumab in Subjects With Hematologic Malignancies

This study is evaluating the safety, pharmacodynamics (PD), and efficacy of acalabrutinib and pembrolizumab in hematologic malignancies.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

This is a Phase 1b/2, open-label, nonrandomized study that will be conducted in 2 stages. In the first stage, Part 1 of the study will determine the safety and preliminary efficacy of acalabrutinib and pembrolizumab in a limited group of B-cell malignancies. In the second stage, Part 2 allows for possible expansion cohorts into a wider range of B-cell malignancies, and Part 3 will evaluate the combination in subjects with myelofibrosis (MF).

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

161

Phase

  • Phase 2
  • Phase 1

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Arizona
      • Tucson, Arizona, United States, 85704
        • Research Site
    • California
      • Los Angeles, California, United States, 90095
        • Research Site
    • Colorado
      • Denver, Colorado, United States, 80218
        • Research Site
    • District of Columbia
      • Washington, District of Columbia, United States, 20007
        • Research Site
    • Illinois
      • Niles, Illinois, United States, 60714
        • Research Site
    • Massachusetts
      • Boston, Massachusetts, United States, 2215
        • Research Site
    • Minnesota
      • Rochester, Minnesota, United States, 55905-0001
        • Research Site
    • Nebraska
      • Omaha, Nebraska, United States, 68198-7680
        • Research Site
    • Ohio
      • Columbus, Ohio, United States, 43210
        • Research Site
    • South Carolina
      • Greenville, South Carolina, United States, 29605
        • Research Site
    • Tennessee
      • Nashville, Tennessee, United States, 37203
        • Research Site
    • Texas
      • Dallas, Texas, United States, 75246
        • Research Site
      • Houston, Texas, United States, 77030
        • Research Site
      • San Antonio, Texas, United States, 78217
        • Research Site
      • Tyler, Texas, United States, 75702
        • Research Site
    • Virginia
      • Fairfax, Virginia, United States, 22031
        • Research Site
      • Roanoke, Virginia, United States, 24014
        • Research Site
    • Washington
      • Vancouver, Washington, United States, 98684
        • Research Site
      • Yakima, Washington, United States, 98902
        • Research Site

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Main Inclusion Criteria:

  • Diagnosis of a hematologic malignancy as documented by medical records and with histology based on criteria established by the World Health Organization (WHO).
  • Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status of ≤ 1.
  • Agreement to use contraception during the study and for 90 days after the last dose of ACP-196 or 120 days after the last dose of pembrolizumab, if sexually active and able to bear or beget children.
  • Completion of all therapy (including surgery, radiotherapy, chemotherapy, immunotherapy, or investigational therapy) for the treatment of cancer ≥ 4 weeks before the start of study therapy.
  • ANC ≥ 0.5 x 10^9/L or platelet count ≥ 50 x 10^9/L unless due to disease involvement in the bone marrow.

Main Exclusion Criteria:

  • A life-threatening illness, medical condition or organ system dysfunction which, in the investigator's opinion, could compromise the subject's safety, interfere with the absorption or metabolism of study drugs, or put the study outcomes at undue risk.
  • Central nervous system (CNS) involvement by lymphoma/leukemia
  • Any therapeutic antibody within 4 weeks of first dose of study drugs.
  • Total bilirubin > 1.5 x ULN; and aspartate aminotransferase (AST) or alanine aminotransferase (ALT) > 3.0 x ULN.
  • Estimated creatinine clearance of < 30 mL/min, calculated using the formula of Cockcroft and Gault (140-Age) • Mass (kg)/(72 • creatinine mg/dL); multiply by 0.85 if female.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Acalabrutinib plus Pembrolizumab

A nonrandomized study that will be conducted in 2 stages. In the first stage, (Safety), subjects will receive Acalabrutinib Dose A orally administered (PO) twice daily (BID) in combination with Pembrolizumab Dose B administered every 3 weeks (Q3W).

The second stage was an expansion of Cohorts with the same dose regimen as the first stage. An additional expansion in subjects with Myelofibrosis was planned but not conducted.

Orally Administered (PO)
Other Names:
  • ACP-196
Intravenous Administered (IV)
Other Names:
  • KEYTRUDA

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (AEs)
Time Frame: 104 weeks
Treatment-emergent AEs were defined as those events that occurred on or after the first dose of study drug, through the treatment phase, and within 30 days following the last dose of study drug.
104 weeks
Number of Participants With Grade 3-4 Adverse Events
Time Frame: 104 weeks
Severity of AEs was graded using the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE), version 4.03
104 weeks
Number of Participants With Grade 5 Adverse Events
Time Frame: 104 weeks
Number of participants with CTCAE Grade 5 (fatal) adverse events
104 weeks
Number of Participants With Any Study-Drug Related AE
Time Frame: 104 weeks
Study drug-related AEs were those assessed by investigator as related to study treatment.
104 weeks
Number of Participants With Grade 3-4 Study-Drug Related AE
Time Frame: 104 weeks
The severity of the AEs was assessed by NCI CTCAE Version 4.03 or higher. Drug-related AEs were those assessed by investigator as related to study treatment.
104 weeks
Number of Participants With Grade 5 Study-Drug Related AE
Time Frame: 104 weeks
Grade 5 (fatal) AEs assessed by investigator as related to study treatment.
104 weeks
Number of Participants With Any SAE
Time Frame: 104 weeks
Serious AEs were those that resulted in death, were life-threatening, required or prolonged in-patient hospitalization, resulted in persistent or significant disability/incapacity, resulted in a congenital anomaly/birth defect in a neonate/infant born to a mother exposed to the investigational product, or were considered a significant medical event by the investigator based on medical judgment.
104 weeks
Number of Participants With Grade 3-4 Any SAE
Time Frame: 104 weeks
Serious AEs were those that resulted in death, were life-threatening, required or prolonged in-patient hospitalization, resulted in persistent or significant disability/incapacity, resulted in a congenital anomaly/birth defect in a neonate/infant born to a mother exposed to the investigational product, or were considered a significant medical event by the investigator based on medical judgment. The severity of the AEs was assessed by NCI CTCAE Version 4.03 or higher.
104 weeks
Number of Participants With Grade 5 Any SAE
Time Frame: 104 weeks
Grade 5 events were fatal events. Serious AEs were those that resulted in death, were life-threatening, required or prolonged in-patient hospitalization, resulted in persistent or significant disability/incapacity, resulted in a congenital anomaly/birth defect in a neonate/infant born to a mother exposed to the investigational product, or were considered a significant medical event by the investigator based on medical judgment.
104 weeks
Number of Participants With Any Study Drug-Related SAE
Time Frame: 104 weeks
Serious AEs were those that resulted in death, were life-threatening, required or prolonged in-patient hospitalization, resulted in persistent or significant disability/incapacity, resulted in a congenital anomaly/birth defect in a neonate/infant born to a mother exposed to the investigational product, or were considered a significant medical event by the investigator based on medical judgment. Drug-related AEs were those assessed by investigator as related to study treatment.
104 weeks
Number of Participants With Any Grade 3-4 Study Drug-Related SAE
Time Frame: 104 weeks
Serious AEs were those that resulted in death, were life-threatening, required or prolonged in-patient hospitalization, resulted in persistent or significant disability/incapacity, resulted in a congenital anomaly/birth defect in a neonate/infant born to a mother exposed to the investigational product, or were considered a significant medical event by the investigator based on medical judgment. The severity of the AEs was assessed by NCI CTCAE Version 4.03 or higher. Drug-related AEs were those assessed by investigator as related to study treatment.
104 weeks
Number of Participants With Any Grade 5 Study Drug-Related SAE
Time Frame: 104 weeks
Grade 5 AEs were fatal events. Serious AEs were those that resulted in death, were life-threatening, required or prolonged in-patient hospitalization, resulted in persistent or significant disability/incapacity, resulted in a congenital anomaly/birth defect in a neonate/infant born to a mother exposed to the investigational product, or were considered a significant medical event by the investigator based on medical judgment. Drug-related AEs were those assessed by investigator as related to study treatment.
104 weeks
Number of Participants With AE Leading to Study Drug Discontinuation, Modification or Delay
Time Frame: 104 weeks
AEs that discontinuation of study treatment, or a reduction in dosage, or a delay (temporary withholding) in treatment.
104 weeks
Number of Participants With AE Leading to Study Drug Discontinuation
Time Frame: 104 weeks
An adverse event that resulted in the permanent discontinuation of study treatment in the study.
104 weeks
Number of Participants With AE Leading to Study Drug Delay
Time Frame: 104 weeks
An adverse event that caused a temporary withholding of study treatment.
104 weeks
Number of Participants With AE Leading to Study Drug Modification
Time Frame: 104 weeks
An adverse event that resulted in a reduction in the dosage of study treatment for that participant.
104 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Overall Response Rate
Time Frame: 104 weeks
The percentage of subjects who achieve a partial response or complete response
104 weeks
Duration of Response
Time Frame: 104 weeks
The interval from the first documentation of response to the earlier of the first documentation of definitive disease progression or death from any cause
104 weeks
Progression-free Survival
Time Frame: 104 weeks
The interval from the first dose date of acalabrutinib or pembrolizumab to the earlier of the first documentation of objective disease progression or death from any cause
104 weeks
Overall Survival
Time Frame: 104 weeks
The time from the first dose date of acalabrutinib or pembrolizumab until date of death due to any cause
104 weeks
Time to Next Treatment
Time Frame: 104 weeks
The time from the first dose date of acalabrutinib or pembrolizumab to the start of the next treatment other than the study treatment
104 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Collaborators

Investigators

  • Study Director: AstraZeneca Clinical Study Information Center, 1-877-240-9479 - information.center@astrazeneca.com

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

February 20, 2015

Primary Completion (Actual)

July 14, 2020

Study Completion (Estimated)

April 1, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 7, 2015

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 7, 2015

First Posted (Estimated)

February 12, 2015

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

February 16, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 19, 2024

Last Verified

January 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

Qualified researchers can request access to anonymized individual patient-level data from AstraZeneca group of companies sponsored clinical trials via the request portal.

All request will be evaluated as per the AZ disclosure commitment:

https://astrazenecagrouptrials.pharmacm.com/ST/Submission/Disclosure. Yes, indicates that AZ are accepting requests for IPD, but this does not mean all requests will be shared.

IPD Sharing Time Frame

AstraZeneca will meet or exceed data availability as per the commitments made to the EFPIA Pharma Data Sharing Principles. For details of our timelines, please rerefer to our disclosure commitment at https://astrazenecagrouptrials.pharmacm.com/ST/Submission/Disclosure.

IPD Sharing Access Criteria

When a request has been approved AstraZeneca will provide access to the deidentified individual patient-level data in an approved sponsored tool . Signed Data Sharing Agreement (non-negotiable contract for data accessors) must be in place before accessing requested information. Additionally, all users will need to accept the terms and conditions of the SAS MSE to gain access. For additional details, please review the Disclosure Statements at https://astrazenecagrouptrials.pharmacm.com/ST/Submission/Disclosure.

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • STUDY_PROTOCOL
  • SAP

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Multiple Myeloma

Clinical Trials on Acalabrutinib

3
Subscribe