An Efficacy and Safety Study of PENTASA in Chinese Patients With Left-sided Active Ulcerative Colitis Followed by a 24-Week Open-Label Extension Phase

October 10, 2017 updated by: Ferring Pharmaceuticals

A Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled, Multi-centre, Superiority Study Investigating the Efficacy and Safety of PENTASA Enema Compared With Placebo Enema for 4-Week Treatment in Chinese Patients With Left-sided Active Ulcerative Colitis (UC) Followed by a Maximal 28-Week Open-Label Extension Phase of PENTASA Enema and/or PENTASA Tablets

The purpose of this study is to investigate the efficacy and safety of 4-week double-blind treatment with PENTASA enema compared with placebo enema in Chinese patients with mild to moderate active left-sided ulcerative colitis, followed by a maximal 28-week open-label extension phase with PENTASA enema and/or PENTASA tablets.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

281

Phase

  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Guangzhou, China
        • The 6th hospital affiliated to Zhongshan University (there may be other sites in this country)

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 70 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Newly diagnosed or recurrent mild to moderate left-sided active ulcerative colitis
  • Mayo score of at least 4 but not greater than 10 points and a score of ≥ 2 for colonoscopy
  • Extent of colonic involvement and endoscopy subscore of Mayo score as confirmed by colonoscopy
  • The patient is compliant with Patient Daily Diary by having adequately responded to the questions on ≥5 of the most recent full 7 days before the Randomization Visit
  • Negative stool test at screening to rule out parasites and bacterial pathogens

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients receiving > 2g/day of oral 5-aminosalicylic acid (5-ASA) products, or receiving topical rectal 5-ASA > 3g/week, within 7 days prior to screening
  • Severe/fulminant ulcerative colitis or toxic dilatation of the colon
  • Prior bowel resection surgery
  • Patients allergic to 5-ASA and derivative, any of the excipients, aspirin, or salicylates
  • Patients with one or more of the diseases: bacillary dysentery, amebic dysentery, chronic schistosomiasis, intestinal tuberculosis and Crohn's disease
  • Patients who are unable to fill in the Patient Daily Diary or follow data-capturing procedures

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Mesalazine
Mesalazine Enema
Other Names:
  • PENTASA® Enema
Placebo Comparator: Placebo
Placebo Enema

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Clinical remission after 4 weeks treatment
Time Frame: At week 4
Defined as a total Mayo score ≤2 points, with no subscore >1 point
At week 4

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Clinical response after 4 weeks treatment
Time Frame: At week 4
Defined as a decrease from baseline in total Mayo score ≥3 points and ≥ 30 percent, with an accompanying decrease in the subscore for rectal bleeding ≥ 1 point or an absolute subscore for rectal bleeding of 0 or 1 point
At week 4
Change in Quality of Life
Time Frame: From baseline to week 4
Based on the Inflammatory Bowel Disease Questionnaire (IBDQ)
From baseline to week 4

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

March 1, 2015

Primary Completion (Actual)

January 5, 2017

Study Completion (Actual)

July 25, 2017

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 16, 2015

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 16, 2015

First Posted (Estimate)

February 23, 2015

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

October 11, 2017

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 10, 2017

Last Verified

October 1, 2017

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Ulcerative Colitis

Clinical Trials on Mesalazine Enema

3
Subscribe