Effectiveness of Two Compression Methods in the Treatment of Upper Limb Lymphedema

April 5, 2017 updated by: Roser Belmonte, Parc de Salut Mar

Comparison of the Effectiveness of a Precast Adjustable Compression Wrap With the Multilayer Compression Bandage in Upper Limb Lymphedema

Treatment of lymphedema is based on a combined program called complex decongestive therapy. The components of the complex decongestive therapy are skin care, kinesiotherapy, manual lymphatic drainage and compression. The compression with multilayer bandage has proved to be the most effective of these therapies when analyzed separately.The multilayer bandage produces a gradient compression on the limb where distal pressure is higher than proximal pressure. Several materials are needed for the multilayer bandage, including tubular bandage lining, digit bandages, foam under-cast padding and multiple layers of short-stretch bandages to cover the entire limb. The Precast Adjustable Compression Wrap fits each patient through a Velcro system.

The aim is to compare the effectiveness of a precast adjustable compression wrap (Circaid) with the multilayer compression bandages in the treatment of the upper limb lymphedema.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

The gold standard of the treatment of lymphedema is based on a combined program called complex decongestive therapy. The components of the complex decongestive therapy are skin care, kinesiotherapy, manual lymphatic drainage and compression. The compression with multilayer bandage has proved to be the most effective of these therapies when analyzed separately. With the multilayer compression bandage the upper limb lymphedema volume decreased a 37.2%.

The multilayer bandage produces a gradient compression on the limb where distal pressure is higher than proximal pressure. Several materials are needed for the multilayer bandage, including tubular bandage lining, digit bandages, foam under-cast padding and multiple layers of short-stretch bandages to cover the entire limb. The Precast Adjustable Compression Wrap fits each patient through a Velcro system.

Decreasing compression is achieved by controlling the tension applied to each Velcro through a visual color guide. The Precast Adjustable Compression Wrap has proved to be safe and effective to treat lower limb lymphedema, but there is little information about its effectiveness in the treatment of the upper limb lymphedema.

The aim is to compare the effectiveness of a precast adjustable compression wrap (Circaid) with the multilayer compression bandages in the treatment of the upper limb lymphedema.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

47

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Barcelona, Spain, 08035
        • Hospital Vall Hebron
    • Barcelona
      • Badalona, Barcelona, Spain, 08916
        • Germans Trias i Pujol Hospital
      • Hospitalet de Llobregat, Barcelona, Spain, 08907
        • Hospital Universitari de Bellvitge

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

Female

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Upper limb lymphedema after axillary lymph node dissection for breast cancer.
  • Lymphedema must affect at least the arm or the forearm.
  • The lymphedema volume excess must be at least 10%
  • The lymphedema must have not been previously treated or have been at least 1 year without treatment.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Bilateral upper limb lymphedema
  • Cognitive or sensorial impairments which could interfere collaboration
  • Plexopathy post radiotherapy
  • Breast cancer in progression Pregnancy or Lactation

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Precast Adjustable Compression Wrap
Precast Adjustable Compression Wrap will be adjusted by the physiotherapist each visit

A physiotherapist well trained in lymphedema treatment will apply a lymphatic drainage to the affected upper limb. Then the physiotherapist will apply the precast adjustable compression wrap to the patient. The patient would maintain the precast adjustable compression wrap until the next session of treatment. The first 10 sessions will be daily from Monday to Friday.

After the 10 first sessions, the treatment will be applied on alternate days (3 per week) until the patient receive a tailored compression garment (7-14 days).

Active Comparator: Multilayer Compression Bandages
Multilayer Compression Bandages will be adjusted by the physiotherapist each visit

A physiotherapist well trained in lymphedema treatment will apply a lymphatic drainage to the affected upper limb. Then the physiotherapist will apply the multilayer bandage to the patient. The patient would maintain the multilayer compression bandage until the next session of treatment. The first 10 sessions will be daily from Monday to Friday.

After the 10 first sessions, the treatment will be applied on alternate days (3 per week) until the patient receive a tailored compression garment (7-14 days).

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in the excess of volume of upper limb
Time Frame: Baseline to 3 months (10 sessions of treatment)

Change in the excess of volume of the affected upper limb. The excess of volume is the difference in volume between the affected and the unaffected upper limb. The upper limb volumes will be obtained from the perimeters of the upper limbs and applying the truncate cone formula.

Baseline to 2 weeks (10 sessions of treatment). A follow up at 3 months

Baseline to 3 months (10 sessions of treatment)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Changes in pain, heaviness, tightness and hardness
Time Frame: Baseline to 3 months (10 sessions of treatment)
Changes in pain, heaviness, tightness and hardness will be measured by visual analogical scales. Baseline to 2 weeks (10 sessions of treatment). A follow up at 3 months
Baseline to 3 months (10 sessions of treatment)
Changes in skin and lymphedema condition
Time Frame: Baseline to 3 months (10 sessions of treatment)
The skin and lymphedema condition will be evaluated every day along the treatment phase and at 3 months of follow up. Baseline to 2 weeks (10 sessions of treatment). A follow up at 3 months
Baseline to 3 months (10 sessions of treatment)
Number of Participants with Serious and Non-Serious Adverse Events
Time Frame: Baseline to 3 months (10 sessions of treatment)
Collection of adverse effects spontaneously reported by the participants and/or observed by the investigators. In order to evaluate tolerability patients will be asked every day about any discomfort or troubles they could feel. On the other hand, it will be daily recorded how many hours the patient had used the precast adjustable compression wrap or the multilayer compression bandages. Baseline to 2 weeks (10 sessions of treatment). A follow up at 3 months
Baseline to 3 months (10 sessions of treatment)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Roser Belmonte, MD, PhD, Parc de Salut Mar

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

October 13, 2014

Primary Completion (Actual)

January 19, 2016

Study Completion (Actual)

April 5, 2017

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 4, 2015

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 17, 2015

First Posted (Estimate)

February 24, 2015

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

April 7, 2017

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 5, 2017

Last Verified

April 1, 2017

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 2014/5584/I

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Lymphedema

Clinical Trials on Precast Adjustable Compression Wrap (Circaid)

Subscribe