Comparison of FlexHD and Alloderm Outcomes in Breast Reconstructive Surgery

July 16, 2018 updated by: University of Arkansas
FlexHD and Alloderm are two common products used in breast reconstruction to hold tissue expanders and implants in place. There have been few chart review studies comparing outcomes between the two materials in breast reconstruction. These studies have determined there is no difference in complication rates between the two materials. However, there have never been any active studies to date. This study will serve as a randomized controlled trial comparing FlexHD and Alloderm. Several outcomes will be measured based off of inclusion and exclusion criteria to determine if either product is more suitable for use in breast reconstruction. This will be performed by randomly assigning patients to receive either FlexHD or Alloderm. Designated outcomes will be followed closely postoperatively. Outcomes will be statistically analyzed to determine complication rates between FlexHD and Alloderm and thus which product is better to use in breast reconstruction.

Study Overview

Status

Withdrawn

Conditions

Detailed Description

FlexHD and Alloderm are two common products used in breast reconstruction to hold tissue expanders and implants in place. There have been few chart review studies comparing outcomes between the two materials in breast reconstruction. These studies have determined there is no difference in complication rates between the two materials. However, there have never been any active studies to date. This study will serve as a randomized controlled trial comparing FlexHD and Alloderm. Several outcomes will be measured based off of inclusion and exclusion criteria to determine if either product is more suitable for use in breast reconstruction. This will be performed by randomly assigning patients to receive either FlexHD or Alloderm. Designated outcomes will be followed closely postoperatively. Outcomes will be statistically analyzed to determine complication rates between FlexHD and Alloderm and thus which product is better to use in breast reconstruction

Study Type

Interventional

Phase

  • Phase 4

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Arkansas
      • Little Rock, Arkansas, United States, 72205
        • University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

Female

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • BMI<30
  • No Prior Breast Radiation
  • No Prior Breast Reduction
  • No Diabetes Mellitus (IDDM and non-IDDM)
  • Non-smoker or quit >6 weeks prior
  • No breast implants or prior breast implants
  • No inflammatory or autoimmune disorders
  • No current anticoagulation therapy
  • No current pregnant

Exclusion Criteria:

  • BMI > 30
  • Prior Breast Radiation
  • Diabetes Mellitus - IDDM and non IDDM
  • Prior Breast Reduction
  • Active Smoker or Recently Quit <6 weeks
  • Prior Breast Implants
  • Inflammatory/Autoimmune Condition (ex. Lupus)
  • Current Anticoagulation Therapy
  • Pregnancy

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: FlexHD
Patients randomly assigned to receive FlexHD for breast reconstruction.
Patients will be randomized to receive FlexHD.
Active Comparator: Alloderm
Patients randomly assigned to receive Alloderm for breast reconstruction.
Patient will be randomized to receive Alloderm.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Wound Dehiscence
Time Frame: One Year
time frame.
One Year

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Pallavi A Kumbla, MD, UAMS

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

March 1, 2016

Primary Completion (Actual)

December 21, 2017

Study Completion (Actual)

December 21, 2017

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 20, 2015

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 25, 2015

First Posted (Estimate)

February 26, 2015

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

July 18, 2018

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 16, 2018

Last Verified

July 1, 2018

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 203456

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Breast Neoplasm

Clinical Trials on FlexHD

Subscribe