Doppler-guided Haemorrhoidal Artery Ligation With Suture Mucopexy vs. Suture Mucopexy Alone

February 20, 2015 updated by: Felix Aigner, Medical University Innsbruck

Doppler-guided Haemorrhoidal Artery Ligation With Suture Mucopexy vs. Suture Mucopexy Alone for the Treatment of Grade III Haemorrhoids: A Prospective-randomised Controlled Trial

Novel minimally invasive techniques were established for prolapsing haemorrhoids to minimise the drawbacks of the golden standard of haemorrhoidal treatment, conventional haemorrhoidectomy techniques. Ligation techniques, such as Doppler-guided haemorrhoidal artery ligation (DG-HAL), were introduced to reduce the arterial inflow of the AVP and thus prevent the haemorrhoidal zone from being part of the continence system. Apart from inappropriate application of this surgical alternative for higher grade haemorrhoids, high recurrence rates of up to 38% after DG-HAL are due to technical failure of the ligation technique itself. This is a prospective randomised controlled trial to evaluate the efficacy of additional Doppler-guided ligation of submucosal haemorrhoidal arteries in patients with symptomatic grade III haemorrhoids.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

All consecutive patients with symptomatic grade III haemorrhoids are randomly allocated to one of the two study arms: (A) DG-HAL with mucopexy or (B) mucopexy alone. Endpoints are pain, faecal incontinence, bleeding, residual prolapse and vascularisation of the anorectal vascular plexus. Vascularisation of the anorectal vascular plexus is assessed by transperineal contrast enhanced ultrasound.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

40

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • grade III haemorrhoids
  • ≥18 years of age

Exclusion Criteria:

  • malignant gastrointestinal disease
  • inflammatory bowel disease
  • any type of proctological intervention (i.e., fistula surgery)
  • recurrent haemorrhoidal disease
  • anorectal trauma in the history

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: DG-HAL with mucopexy
Mucopexy with DG-HAL is performed using a specific device consisting of a proctoscope equipped with a Doppler probe and a light source. The proctoscope model in our study has a sliding part comprising the operating window and Doppler probe for better proximal and distal movement without repositioning the proctoscope during mucopexy.
Mucopexy with or without DG-HAL is performed using a specific device consisting of a proctoscope equipped with a Doppler probe and a light source. The proctoscope model in our study has a sliding part comprising the operating window and Doppler probe for better proximal and distal movement without repositioning the proctoscope during mucopexy.
Active Comparator: mucopexy alone
Mucopexy without DG-HAL is performed using the same specific device consisting of a proctoscope equipped with a Doppler probe and a light source as described above.
Mucopexy with or without DG-HAL is performed using a specific device consisting of a proctoscope equipped with a Doppler probe and a light source. The proctoscope model in our study has a sliding part comprising the operating window and Doppler probe for better proximal and distal movement without repositioning the proctoscope during mucopexy.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
pain assessment wit 1-month-pain diary
Time Frame: 1 month
1 month

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

October 1, 2010

Primary Completion (Actual)

July 1, 2014

Study Completion (Actual)

July 1, 2014

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 6, 2015

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 20, 2015

First Posted (Estimate)

February 26, 2015

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

February 26, 2015

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 20, 2015

Last Verified

February 1, 2015

More Information

Terms related to this study

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Third Degree Hemorrhoids

Clinical Trials on mucopexy +/- Doppler-guided haemorrhoidal artery ligation

3
Subscribe