Evaluation of Superior Rectal Arterial Embolization in Hemorrhoidal Disease

April 30, 2024 updated by: Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel

A Randomized Comparative Evaluation of Superior Rectal Arterial Embolization in Hemorrhoidal Disease

SRAE is a promising treatment of bleeding HD as a minimally invasive approach without sphincter damage nor direct mucosal anorectal trauma. Feasibility, efficacy and safety were studied in several trials. A randomized controlled study should confirm the benefits of this technique and will define its therapeutic role in HD.

Embolization and DG-HAL are based on the same concept of vascular occlusion of hemorrhoidal branches of the rectal artery. Furthermore, DG-HAL and RBL are equally effective procedures. The assumption is that treatment with SRAE is not inferior in comparison to RBL or DG HAL in respectively patients without or with antiplatelet/anticoagulation therapy in terms of symptom control and bleeding (non-inferiority study).

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Hemorrhoidal disease (HD) is the most common anorectal pathology. Therapeutic management of HD ranges from conservative treatment and instrumental treatment to surgical approach. Beside these, certain minimally invasive techniques such as radiofrequency ablation, laser coagulation and Superior Rectal Artery Embolization (SRAE) are gaining interest. SRAE is a promising treatment of bleeding HD as a minimally invasive approach without sphincter damage nor direct mucosal anorectal trauma. Feasibility, efficacy and safety were studied in several trials. A randomized controlled study should confirm the benefits of this technique and will define its therapeutic role in HD. Embolization and DG-HAL are based on the same concept of vascular occlusion of hemorrhoidal branches of the rectal artery. Furthermore, DG-HAL and RBL are equally effective procedures. The assumption is that treatment with SRAE is not inferior in comparison to RBL or DG HAL in respectively patients without or with antiplatelet/anticoagulation therapy in terms of symptom control and bleeding (non-inferiority study).

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

80

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

      • Jette, Belgium, 1090
        • Recruiting
        • UZ Brussel
        • Contact:
          • Magali Surmont
          • Phone Number: 60 11 +32 2 477

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • All patients referred for Hemorrhoidal disease with bleeding are eligible. Significant bleeding is defined as a HBS of ≥ 5.
  • Age > 18 years old;
  • Sexes eligible for study: all
  • Hemorrhoidal disease grade I-III according the Goligher classification with rectal bleeding as predominant symptom
  • History of prior instrumental treatment of HD does not prohibit inclusion
  • Able to understand and read Dutch, French or English

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Permanent hemorrhoidal prolapse/grade IV hemorrhoidal disease
  • Rectal prolapse
  • History of proctological surgery for HD
  • Acute complicated course of HD i.e. acute thrombosis (fluxio hemorrhoidalis or perianal hematoma)
  • Anal stenosis, congenital of acquired
  • Chronic anal fissure
  • Active rectal inflammation, including peri-anal abscess (e.g. Inflammatory Bowel Disease, infectious,…)
  • History of colorectal or anal cancer
  • History of rectal or sigmoidal resection
  • Portal hypertension and liver cirrhosis Child Pugh C
  • Radiation rectitis
  • Neurological disease involving anal sphincter musculature
  • Severe psychiatric disorder
  • Pregnancy
  • Allergy to iodinated contrast agents
  • Colorectal neoplasia as the cause of bleeding (excluded with a (virtual) colonoscopy in the last year)

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Placebo Comparator: anticoagulation group with DG HAL
The procedure is performed in lithotomy position with a modified proctoscope including a Doppler transducer (THD device) under anesthesia during a one-day hospitalization. This transanal Doppler guidance enables accurate detection and targeted suture ligation of the SRAs Following gel lubrication, the proctoscope is inserted through the anal canal reaching the low rectum, about 6-7 cm from the anal verge. After identification of the best place for artery ligation, the Doppler system is turned off. The artery will be directly ligated with a Z-stitch at the site of the best Doppler signal.
Active Comparator: anticoagulation group with SRAE

This technique is realized under local anesthesia during a one-day hospitalization. The interventional radiologist will perform the procedure in the angiography room. After local anesthesia right femoral artery puncture is performed and a 4 F or 5 F introducer sheath is placed using the Seldinger technique. With an appropriate 4 or 5 F catheter the superior rectal artery is catheterized. With a microcatheter the different branches are selectively occluded with microcoils. The endpoint of embolization is reached when all SRA branches above the pubic ramus are embolized, with cessation of flow distally or a static column of contrast.

The procedure can be repeated with addition of the embolization of the middle rectal wall artery (MRA) in case of failure after 12 weeks.

Placebo Comparator: no anticoagulation group with RBL
This instrumental technique is realized during consultation. A rubber band is applied on top of each hemorrhoidal complex via a proctoscope. This banding causes an ulceration which heals with resulting fibrosis. The patient can receive a maximum of 3 RBL during each session, which can be repeated up to 3 times at a 6 weeks interval.
Active Comparator: no anticoagulation group with SRAE

This technique is realized under local anesthesia during a one-day hospitalization. The interventional radiologist will perform the procedure in the angiography room. After local anesthesia right femoral artery puncture is performed and a 4 F or 5 F introducer sheath is placed using the Seldinger technique. With an appropriate 4 or 5 F catheter the superior rectal artery is catheterized. With a microcatheter the different branches are selectively occluded with microcoils. The endpoint of embolization is reached when all SRA branches above the pubic ramus are embolized, with cessation of flow distally or a static column of contrast.

The procedure can be repeated with addition of the embolization of the middle rectal wall artery (MRA) in case of failure after 12 weeks.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
symptom control
Time Frame: from baseline to 3 months
the main objective is to control the symptoms, for this the Hemorrhoidal Bleeding Score is to be used
from baseline to 3 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Symptom control
Time Frame: from baseline to 12 months
a secondary objective is to control the symptoms, for this the Hemorrhoidal Bleeding Score is to be used
from baseline to 12 months
Patient reported effectiveness
Time Frame: from baseline till 12 months
a secondary objective is to report patient effectiveness, this will be measured using Patient-Reported Outcome Measure-Haemorrhoidal Impact and Satisfaction score (PROM-HISS)
from baseline till 12 months
Patient reported effectiveness
Time Frame: from baseline till 12 months
a secondary objective is to report patient effectiveness, this will be measured using the 5-level EQ-5D-5L score
from baseline till 12 months
clinical effectiveness
Time Frame: from baseline till 12 months
a secondary objective is to report clinical effectiveness, this will be measured using the Goligher score
from baseline till 12 months
prevalence of complications
Time Frame: from baseline till 12 months
a secondary objective is to report the prevalence of complications, this will be measured using among others the pain score reported by Visual Analogue Scale (VAS)
from baseline till 12 months
prevalence of re-interventions
Time Frame: from baseline till 12 months
a secondary objective is to report the prevalence of re-interventions, this will be measured among others with the pain score reported by Visual Analogue Scale (VAS)
from baseline till 12 months
prevalence of fecal incontinence
Time Frame: from baseline till 12 months
a secondary objective is to report the prevalence of fecal incontinence, this will be measured using the Jorge-wexner score
from baseline till 12 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

June 1, 2023

Primary Completion (Estimated)

December 15, 2025

Study Completion (Estimated)

December 15, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

December 21, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 24, 2023

First Posted (Actual)

January 26, 2023

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimated)

May 3, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 30, 2024

Last Verified

April 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Hemorrhoids

Clinical Trials on Doppler-Guided Hemorrhoidal Artery Ligation (DG-HAL)

3
Subscribe