- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT02373501
Extra - Abdominal Versus Intra - Abdominal Repair of the Uterine Incision at Cesarean Section (EKAM)
To evaluate the effects of extra-abdominal repair of the uterine incision compared to intra-abdominal repair, and to study is there superiority of one technique over the other in terms of primary outcomes - operative( up to 4 hours after beginning of anesthesia) and post operative ( until day 4 after operation ) measurements , secondary outcomes, long-term outcomes and subjective outcomes.
PRIMARY OUTCOMES:
Intra - operative ( during the operation up to 4 hours from anesthesia )
- nausea and vomiting
- intraoperative hypotension
- intraoperative pain
Post operative ( 4 hours from anesthesia and until release from hospital )
- Blood transfusion
- Venous thromboembolism
- Febrile Morbidity
- Endometritis
- Wound Infection
- Death
Subjective measures:
- complain of pain 1-10 on day 1 post operative
- time until walking
- number of Days until having bowel movement
- overall satisfactory
SECONDARY OUTCOMES:
- Operative time
- Estimated blood loss ( ebl ) - hemoglobin levels
- Hospital stay
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Cesarean section (CS) delivery is one of the most frequent surgical procedures to be performed worldwide and rates of CS delivery are increasing. In the late 80's, the rate of caesarean deliveries was 10-13 % in most of the big hospitals in Israel, and today it reaches up to 20-25% of all deliveries.
Numerous different surgical techniques for caesarean section delivery have been described, and the debate about the optimal caesarean technique to minimize surgical morbidity is ongoing.
One of the more controversial issues regarding caesarean technique is the manner by which uterine repair is conducted after delivery of the infant(s) and placenta.
Two techniques are being used depending on the uterus position during repairmen : In situ within the peritoneal cavity (intra- abdominal repair) or temporarily exteriorized onto the mother's abdomen (extra- abdominal repair).
Arguments in favor of temporary exteriorization include better visualization of any uterine extensions and more rapid uterine repair with consequent reductions in both operative time and intraoperative blood loss. Opponents of extraabdominal repair argue that this technique increases rates of intraoperative nausea and vomiting, adnexal trauma on replacement, possible infection, and venous air embolism (VAE) .
On this study the investigators prospectively recruit women who are about to be electively operated. The patients will be randomized into two groups - extra- abdominal versus intra-abdominal uterine repair using computer randomization. Different charts will be for first CS delivery versus recurrent CS delivery. The patient won't know to which group she was designated . On day three after operation - she will be asked to fill out questionnaire with one of the investigators for subjective measurements
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
-
Ramat - Gan, Israel
- Sheba Medical Center
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- singleton pregnancy
- term pregnancy
Exclusion Criteria:
- chorioamnionitis
- uterine rupture
- hysterotomy - adhesiolysis
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Single
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: intra-abdominal repair
intra-abdominal repair of uterine incision, after delivery of the fetus and the placenta.
|
Intra abdominal repair of uterine incision
|
|
Experimental: extra-abdominal repair
extra-abdominal repair of uterine incision, after delivery of the fetus and the placenta.
|
Extra abdominal repair of uterine incision
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Time Frame |
|---|---|
|
nausea and vomiting
Time Frame: during operation- 4 hours from anasthesia
|
during operation- 4 hours from anasthesia
|
|
intraoperative hypotension
Time Frame: during operation- 4 hours from anasthesia
|
during operation- 4 hours from anasthesia
|
|
intraoperative pain
Time Frame: during operation- 4 hours from anasthesia
|
during operation- 4 hours from anasthesia
|
|
Blood transfusion
Time Frame: during operation- 4 hours from anasthesia
|
during operation- 4 hours from anasthesia
|
|
Venous thromboembolism
Time Frame: durind operation - 4 hours from anasthesia
|
durind operation - 4 hours from anasthesia
|
|
Febrile Morbidity
Time Frame: post operative - untill release from hospitalization usually day 4
|
post operative - untill release from hospitalization usually day 4
|
|
Endometritis
Time Frame: post operative- untill release from hospitalization usually day 4
|
post operative- untill release from hospitalization usually day 4
|
|
Wound Infection
Time Frame: post operative- untill release from hospitalization usually day 4
|
post operative- untill release from hospitalization usually day 4
|
|
Death
Time Frame: post operative - untill release from hospitalization usually day 4
|
post operative - untill release from hospitalization usually day 4
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Time Frame |
|---|---|
|
Operative time
Time Frame: operative time - since anasthesia untill closure of skin
|
operative time - since anasthesia untill closure of skin
|
|
Estimated blood loss ( ebl ) - HGB levels
Time Frame: operative- 4 hours from anasthesia
|
operative- 4 hours from anasthesia
|
|
Hospital stay
Time Frame: post operative
|
post operative
|
Other Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Time Frame |
|---|---|
|
complain of pain 1-10 on day 1 post operative
Time Frame: post operative - on day 3 post operative
|
post operative - on day 3 post operative
|
|
time from surgery until first walking
Time Frame: post operative - during hospitalization
|
post operative - during hospitalization
|
|
number of Days until having bowel movement,
Time Frame: post operative - during hospitalization
|
post operative - during hospitalization
|
|
overall satisfactory
Time Frame: post operative - during hospitalization
|
post operative - during hospitalization
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Elias Castel, MD, Sheba Medical Center
Publications and helpful links
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start
Primary Completion (Actual)
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Estimate)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- SHEBA-13-0494-EC-CTIL
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Cesarean Wound Repair
-
Ricardo A Gutierrez Ramirez, MD, MSc, FACOGCompletedCesarean Section Scar | Tissue Adhesives | Cesarean Wound Repair | Cosmetic Appearance of Cesarean ScarHonduras
-
Uludag UniversityUnknownCesarean Section Complications | Cesarean Wound Disruption | Cesarean Wound; DehiscenceTurkey
-
Odense University HospitalHvidovre University Hospital; Smith & Nephew, Inc.; University of Southern Denmark and other collaboratorsCompletedSurgical Wound Infection | Cesarean Section; Dehiscence | Complications; Cesarean Section | Infection; Cesarean Section | Complications; Cesarean Section, Wound, Dehiscence | Wound; Rupture, Surgery, Cesarean SectionDenmark
-
Odense University HospitalHvidovre University Hospital; Smith & Nephew, Inc.; University of Southern Denmark and other collaboratorsCompletedSurgical Wound Infection | Cesarean Section; Dehiscence | Complications; Cesarean Section | Infection; Cesarean Section | Complications; Cesarean Section, Wound, Dehiscence | Wound; Rupture, Surgery, Cesarean SectionDenmark
-
Northwell HealthCompletedCesarean Section Complications | Cesarean Wound Disruption | Cesarean Wound; DehiscenceUnited States
-
Bezmialem Vakif UniversityCompletedCesarean Section Complications | Wound Heal | Suture Related Complication | Cesarean Wound DisruptionTurkey
-
SCARM Institute, Tabriz, IranUnknownSternal Wound RepairIran, Islamic Republic of
-
Asfendiyarov Kazakh National Medical UniversityCenter for Perinatology and Pediatric Surgery, Almaty, Kazakhstan; Zhalyn Scientific...RecruitingSkin Wound Healing After Cesarean Section | Cesarean Section Scar HealingKazakhstan
-
Piazza della Vittoria 14 Studio Medico - Ginecologia...CompletedCesarean Section Complications | Cesarean Wound; DehiscenceItaly
-
Kocaeli UniversityCompletedCesarean Section; Dehiscence | Cesarean Wound; DehiscenceTurkey
Clinical Trials on Intra-abdominal repair
-
Maisonneuve-Rosemont HospitalCompleted
-
Aalborg University HospitalCompletedPneumoperitoneum | Acute Kidney Injury | KidneyDenmark
-
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire VaudoisUnknownSurgery | Appendicitis | Diverticulitis | PancreatitisSwitzerland
-
Zagazig UniversityActive, not recruiting
-
University Of PerugiaWilliam Cook EuropeTerminatedAortic Aneurysm, Abdominal | EndovascularNetherlands, Israel, Czech Republic, France, Germany, Italy, Poland, Spain, United Kingdom
-
Lawson Health Research InstituteUnknownIntra-Abdominal Hypertension | Abdominal Compartment Syndrome
-
University of Wisconsin, MadisonCompleted
-
Hamilton Health Sciences CorporationThe Physicians' Services Incorporated FoundationUnknownAortic Aneurysm, AbdominalCanada
-
University of PadovaRecruitingRespiratory Failure | Respiratory Distress Syndrome, AdultItaly
-
The Cleveland ClinicTerminatedVentral Hernia | Incisional Hernia | Parastomal HerniaUnited States