Isthmocele After Endometrial and Non-endometrial Suturing in Cesarean Section

December 14, 2020 updated by: Şener Gezer, Kocaeli University
This study compares the effect of two techniques of uterine closure, with or without endometrial suturing on isthmocele development after cesarean section.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Cesarean section is the most common surgery performed on pregnant women. Poor healing of the incision of the uterus leads to isthmocele development. Long-term morbidities associated with isthmocele are uterine scar pregnancy, uterine perforation, pelvic pain, and spotting-style bleeding after menstruation. Many factors that may affect the healing of uterine scar have been studied in the literature (i.e. Double or single-layer closure, locked or unlocked closure, uterine retroflection). Suturing complete fold of the wound lips during the closure of the uterus may cause the endometrial layer to be embedded in the myometrium and to form niche tissue. The study hypothesized that isthmocele development can be reduced by suturing without enclosing the endometrium during uterine closure.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

170

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Kocaeli, Turkey, 41380
        • Kocaeli University

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 45 years (Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

Female

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Term pregnancy (≥37 weeks of gestation)
  • Singleton pregnancy
  • Primary cesarean

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Previous cesarean section
  • Previous uterine surgery
  • Multiple gestations
  • Mullerian anomalies
  • Active labor
  • Placenta previa/accreta

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Prevention
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Entire fold uterine closure
The uterus will be sewn with full fold locked sutures that pass through myometrium and endometrium.
Closure of the uterus at the time of primary cesarean will be performed with suturing the endometrium.
Experimental: Non-endometrial uterine closure
The uterus will be sewn with locked sutures that pass through myometrium without endometrium.
Closure of the uterus at the time of primary cesarean will be performed without suturing the endometrium.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number of patients with isthmocele six month after cesarean section
Time Frame: 6 months after intervention
Residual myometrium thickness of less then 2.5 mm with transvaginal ultrasonography
6 months after intervention
Mean myometrium thickness
Time Frame: 6 months after intervention
Myometrial thickness measured at incision site with transvaginal ultrasonography
6 months after intervention

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Spotting
Time Frame: 6 months after intervention
The rate of spotting complains of patients
6 months after intervention

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Şener Gezer, M.D, Kocaeli University

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

December 16, 2019

Primary Completion (Actual)

December 14, 2020

Study Completion (Actual)

December 14, 2020

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

December 12, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 12, 2019

First Posted (Actual)

December 13, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

December 16, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 14, 2020

Last Verified

December 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • KIA 2019/94

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Cesarean Section; Dehiscence

Clinical Trials on Closure of the uterus with endometrium at the time of cesarean

3
Subscribe